butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Benn and Enoch Powell.Who where you thinking of? Benn?
Benn and Enoch Powell.Who where you thinking of? Benn?
If you're asking me to predict what will happen, though, I imagine the political class will find it hard to justify going against the result of the referendum. (Despite it being advisory when they could have made it legislative if they'd wanted).
But that's just a guess.
I have just heard Angela "Speaking as a mother" Leadsom on Women's Hour saying that she does not want freedom of movement nor the single market.
yeh being as it was conservatives who did so much to fuck it up in the first place it is only right and fitting they put it right. but i am not confident they won't cock it up again.
I'm not liking the sound of what he has in mind.yeh being as it was conservatives who did so much to fuck it up in the first place it is only right and fitting they put it right. but i am not confident they won't cock it up again.
so often the title sounds nice and good but the verbiage within is vile and nastyI'm not liking the sound of what he has in mind.
The Tories using the shock of a Leave vote and a strengthening of the party right to help push the country in an even more neo-liberal direction was, I would say, the most predictable outcome of all this. I hope no-one here was so naïve as to fail to see it coming.I'm not liking the sound of what he has in mind.
If you're asking me to predict what will happen, though, I imagine the political class will find it hard to justify going against the result of the referendum. (Despite it being advisory when they could have made it legislative if they'd wanted).
But that's just a guess.
That's a possibility. And it's worth noting David Allen Green's understanding of the government stance: the European Communities Act 1972 is still in force and would need to be repealed by a parliamentary vote before Article 50 could be triggered.That's the prevailing wisdom at the moment, but only in public discourse, and it may well go off the boil, particularly as the economic consequences of the referendum start to bite and the reality sinks in that there is no deal with the EU on the table that isn't poisonous. What to do about A50 is not a decision that needs to be taken urgently, unless we enter a new financial crisis, in which case it may become easier to undo the referendum result. If that doesn't happen, Theresa May and/or her successors may find ways of delaying the decision until such time as no-one is quite so bothered any more. I wouldn't be too surprised if we see something similar to Gordon Brown's five tests for joining the Euro.
Nope That makes no sense at all. 72 Communities is way down the track after Article 50That's a possibility. And it's worth noting David Allen Green's understanding of the government stance: the European Communities Act 1972 is still in force and would need to be repealed by a parliamentary vote before Article 50 could be triggered.
Nope That makes no sense at all. 72 Communities is way down the track after Article 50
No, that's not right. The legal object
ion is that triggering A50 would impliedly go against ECA72, so you need to repeal or amend it first, which can only be done by parliament. Having a vote later on would not deal with the objection. Ignoring the objection also won't deal with it, because it will end up in court.
I don't think it really matters what you make of the objection. The government is not going to fight tooth and nail to avoid consulting parliament. It's going to feign annoyance and reluctantly accept the legal advice it makes sure it gets. Or, if it hasn't learned the lesson about not treating the country as a gambling chip in Casino Tory Party, it may go to court, confident of losing, purely for the theatrics and hubris.
Well good job you've been looking at this for a whole then
Nope.Nope That makes no sense at all. 72 Communities is way down the track after Article 50
Nope.
In "my case"? I have passed on a legal expert's reading of what government lawyers yesterday said. I made no case.My biggest concern here, is people telling interested parties 'don't worry can't happen, rather than listening to their concerns and passing them on (in your case to Victoria Quay.)
As to whether we use the emergency exit as laid down or first, repeal the act that binds us to using the prescribed exit mechanism; I will concede there is not unanimity over this (oddly). The route as described by you ends up in a Vienna Convention mess and would most likely NOT be taken.
In "my case"? I have passed on a legal expert's reading of what government lawyers yesterday said. I made no case.
It must be me, but I seldom have any idea what you're on about.
However, I have a sister who lives in near Leith Links, and I can confirm that there's a nearby pub of that name. So I've come out of this exchange with one certainty.
So you're not actually talking to me or about anything I said?
OK.
As to whether we use the emergency exit as laid down or first, repeal the act that binds us to using the prescribed exit mechanism; I will concede there is not unanimity over this (oddly). The route as described by you ends up in a Vienna Convention mess and would most likely NOT be taken.
depends how you define it.Brexit ain't going to happen is it?
It must be me, but I seldom have any idea what you're on about...
depends how you define it.
I'll "say" that, will I?But now you'll say that you are just quoting experts.