brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
or not.so talks about talks about talks
or not.so talks about talks about talks
they can use the letters of introduction as kindling on the slopes of the thatcher peninsulaSteamer trunk , revolver and letters of introduction brexit
he isn't talking to you.Don't get all this no to no deal shit.
UK: "We want a deal, it must be a good deal, but we won't accept no deal."
EU: "Ok, the deal is, everything stays as it was. or no deal."
I hate them all tbh but this careerist middle management mediocrity mindset is appalling.
It’s one too many. Or one too few. Never rhetoric an even number (unless doing a list of pairs).Apalling is right. That's way too many M words in a row.
Caroline Lucas came out of her meeting saying May isn't budging on anything even if you do sit down with her.The preconditions for 'talks' matrix is becoming ever more Byzantine...May has her 'redlines', Corbyn has his no to 'NoDeal', SNP also have no to 'NoDeal' but with specific rider of A5o extension and the SNP,LDs & the rest have all laid the "People's Vote" pre-condition on joining Lab any further VoNC.
Pick the bones out of that Juncker.
Don't get all this no to no deal shit.
UK: "We want a deal, it must be a good deal, but we won't accept no deal."
EU: "Ok, the deal is, everything stays as it was. or no deal."
auld corbo likes a challengeI'd have a lot more respect for Corbyn at this point if he said as much instead of pretending he could somehow conjure up a better deal between now and March. Bearing in mind even if May called a general elction tomorrow it wouldn't actually happen for another six weeks, after which Prime Minister Corbyn would have all of ten working days to get a deal together and get it agreed by the EU and parliament.
didn't he say an extension would be necessary now the other day?I'd have a lot more respect for Corbyn at this point if he said as much instead of pretending he could somehow conjure up a better deal between now and March. Bearing in mind even if May called a general elction tomorrow it wouldn't actually happen for another six weeks, after which Prime Minister Corbyn would have all of ten working days to get a deal together and get it agreed by the EU and parliament.
didn't he say an extension would be necessary now the other day?
didn't he say an extension would be necessary now the other day?
I've pretty much given up pretending to understand what's going on here now, but surely the point Corbyn should be driving, and is driving, is that May's 'red lines' have failed. May appears to be in a state of deep denial about this. It's a strong position, potentially - lay out how your negotiating position would be different (and Labour's under Corbyn would be significantly different) and what you would expect to come from it. Just removing one of May's red lines - ending free movement - would massively change things. Add in remaining in the customs union and you have a totally different position really. May's deal represents an attempt to be both hard and soft at the same time. It can't be done, so a choice between the two needs to be made, and the case needs to be made that there is no mandate for a hard brexit when nearly half of people who voted don't want any brexit at all.Even so, that buys him less than two months.
At least it's giving these right wing parties a sense of what it's been like on the left for decades.The preconditions for 'talks' matrix is becoming ever more Byzantine...May has her 'redlines', Corbyn has his no to 'NoDeal', SNP also have no to 'NoDeal' but with specific rider of A5o extension and the SNP,LDs & the rest have all laid the "People's Vote" pre-condition on joining Lab any further VoNC.
Pick the bones out of that Juncker.
Isn't labour's insistence on taking no deal off the table their way of saying that they don't want anything to do with helping the tories out of their bexit mess. They'd rather just let the tories continue to fail to come up with a solution the commons can agree to rather than get involved in coming up with a viable cross party solution.
Sit back on the opposition benches and discuss when is the best time for the next no confidence vote. It's arguably playing party politics above the national interest.
Precisely. That chimes very closely with what I've just said here. (Should there be a second referendum? New question.).What the fuck is this "national interest" that people keeping deploying as some sorta trump card?
I bet you the national interest and my best interests differ somewhat....
Precisely. That chimes very closely with what I've just said here. (Should there be a second referendum? New question.).
Wish I'd seen your post first, chilango, I'd have incorporated that point.
ideological cover for bellends basically
There is simply nothing to suggest that May’s offer to listen is genuine. Corbyn found her out in one request.
The other parties will leave the ‘talks’ enraged soon enough.
I see that Vince Cable has said he won't vote with Labour on any future no confidence votes now. So the lib dems at least seem more enraged with labour.