elbows
Well-Known Member
The EU is a monolith institution the nature of which makes it niegh on impossible to get an agreement within the proposed time frame. 27 parliments have to agree a deal. Within those there are some that have regional assemblies that have to agree a deal also before the national parliament can. Then there are those with specific interests that will use brexit for their own leverage eg Spain and the Gibraltar question. Why is anyone surprised it's not going to plan? The eu is sticking to its stated agenda and order of battle which is not to the UK's liking. No fucking shit Sherlock.
And in addition to all the actual shit that is really going wrong behind the scenes, there is also the long history of politicians from many countries, most certainly including the uk to consider. I'm talking about how public statements & posturing over all things involving EU negotiations at the best of times have often been at odds with what they actually say privately in EU meetings. Ken Clarke was going on about this in parliament recently, albeit in a more limited context than I'm applying it to. I will probably find the quote shortly.
Under the Major Government, we introduced a process whereby parts of the European Council meetings were held in public. The Council of Ministers do hold public sessions, and an attempt was made to reach decisions in public sessions. It probably still goes on. [Interruption.] It does not amount to very much.
We did try to tackle this criticism. What happened was that each of the 28 Ministers gave little speeches entirely designed for their national newspapers and television, and negotiations and discussion did not make much practical progress. When the public sessions were over, the Ministers went into private session to negotiate and reach agreement. I used to find that the best business at the European Council was usually done over lunch. I have attended more European Council meetings than most people have had hot dinners. The dinners and the lunches tended to be where reasonable understandings were made. There were very few votes, but Governments made it clear when they opposed anything. When the council was over, everyone gave a press conference. It was a slightly distressing habit, because some of the accounts of Ministers for the assembled national press did not bear a close resemblance to what they had been saying inside the Council. I regret to say that some British Ministers fell into that trap. British Ministers and Ministers of other nationalities who had fiercely advocated regulating inside the Council would hold a press conference describing their valiant efforts to block what had now come in, which confirms some of my hon. Friend’s criticisms.
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - Hansard Online
Now to be fair he then goes on to play down how often the British Government failed to make it clear what they really approved and disapproved of, but I thought I'd throw it out there now anyway.
Last edited: