Countries need to elect left wing governments because they are better for ordinary folk.
OK, so those "ordinary folk" who supported Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Mugabe, Kim Jung-un, Chavez, Castro etc are better off, are they?
Countries need to elect left wing governments because they are better for ordinary folk.
OK, so those "ordinary folk" who supported Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Mugabe, Kim Jung-un, Chavez, Castro etc are better off, are they?
give it long enough and we'll get 'pinochet had it right'I need a "Nazis were left wing" and a "Capitalists made your computer" before I have bingo.
I need a "Nazis were left wing" and a "Capitalists made your computer" before I have bingo.
Have we had ''Unions holding the country to ransom'' yet?
Soon come.
Yet it's still on the cards
If anything has become glaringly obvious of late, it's the EUs obsession with money, wringing the last pound of flesh from Greece and sticking us for as much as they can get, while voicing hypocritical 'concerns' about citizens rights and the Irish border.
Lastest bit of hubris from EU. UK kicked out of the European city of culture. EU now believe they can redraw the map of Europe.
The Irish border seems to be the thorniest problem. Opposition to every mooted solution is too strong for any of them to work.
It’s an EU project. The rules clearly state that you need to be a member state of the EU in order to take part. The hubris is on the part of the UK.
It's open to EFTA members as well; there is still time to sneak back in.
as you well know i meant paying for access to the single market and customs union without having a seat at the top table.What's "still on the cards"?Junker and Barnier threatening to hold Poland to its EU obligations? Or the other states in the area to dismantle their barbed wire fences and treat refugees like human beings?
If anything has become glaringly obvious of late, it's the EUs obsession with money, wringing the last pound of flesh from Greece and sticking us for as much as they can get, while voicing hypocritical 'concerns' about citizens rights and the Irish border.
It's open to EFTA members as well; there is still time to sneak back in.
Yes, this will be Reykjavik in 2000 Stavanger in 2008 & Istanbul in 2010 then? The EU can of course make the rules up as it goes along. This is an arts/cultural thing that could be kept outside politics. Instead of trying to accomodate a democratic decision of a member state the EU the EU shows itself again how nasty & mean spirited it is being over this. If it was serious about trying to reach a deal with UK it would not be as petty as this.It’s an EU project. The rules clearly state that you need to be a member state of the EU in order to take part. The hubris is on the part of the UK.
how do you think arts and culture are not inherently political?Yes, this will be Reykjavik in 2000 Stavanger in 2008 & Istanbul in 2010 then? The EU can of course make the rules up as it goes along. This is an arts/cultural thing that could be kept outside politics. Instead of trying to accomodate a democratic decision of a member state the EU the EU shows itself again how nasty & mean spirited it is being over this. If it was serious about trying to reach a deal with UK it would not be as petty as this.
As well as disrespecting a democratic decision of a member state it is also disrespecting the 48% of UK voters that voted remain. Something the remainers are missing perhaps?
Like it or not, the decision to set up a City of Culture thing was political. It was set up to help to foster a sense of unity within the EU. There are few things I could care less about, but why would the UK want to remain part of it? Why should they be allowed to? Presumably there's some kind of budget set aside for this from the EU. Maybe the UK wants to stay part of this bit of the EU and would like to contribute? What other parts would they like to stay part of? Not the bits that have the richer countries helping the poorer countries - that part of fostering European unity is one they don't want.Yes, this will be Reykjavik in 2000 Stavanger in 2008 & Istanbul in 2010 then? The EU can of course make the rules up as it goes along. This is an arts/cultural thing that could be kept outside politics. Instead of trying to accomodate a democratic decision of a member state the EU the EU shows itself again how nasty & mean spirited it is being over this. If it was serious about trying to reach a deal with UK it would not be as petty as this.
This is just waffle. It's an EU thing. They set it up.However you view it this is a mean spirited act that shows what a bunch of cunts the EU are. There was no need to add this to the mix at all. It will achieve nothing. Unless the EU believe they have the power to redraw the map of the world then best they rename it the EU city of culture.
However you view it this is a mean spirited act that shows what a bunch of cunts the EU are. There was no need to add this to the mix at all. It will achieve nothing. Unless the EU believe they have the power to redraw the map of the world then best they rename it the EU city of culture.
Yes, this will be Reykjavik in 2000 Stavanger in 2008 & Istanbul in 2010 then? The EU can of course make the rules up as it goes along.
The title of European Capital of Culture rotates around eligible countries.
Cities from non-EU countries have held the title before - but if a country isn't in the EU, it must be a candidate to join or must be in the European Free Trade Association or European Economic Area.
Why are citizens rights and the Irish border hypocritical ‘concerns’ ?
Alex
Ready for what? Being fucked?The EU are not looking to make a deal with the UK, they want to string us along and fuck us up as much as they can in the process. Telling them to go whistle today saves us the£20bn£40bn, or whatever it will be next week and means we can get on being ready for march 2019.
Ready for what? Being fucked?
Who's 'we'?