philosophical
Well-Known Member
Here come de judgethat's the least of the things you should apologise for.
Here come de judgethat's the least of the things you should apologise for.
What did it cost to go from Riga to Grimsby in steerage in 1890?
I don't find it at all difficult to imagine millions of people wanting to move to the UK if it were possible1962, not 68, but yes, the idea that having an open border with a large chunk of the world would lead to millions (or billions as suggested) coming here (flooding here, perhaps?) is idiotic. There was net emigration from Britain in much of that time.
What an absolute joke: the same sort of people who were fighting for Remain (ergo FoM within the EU) talking about the absurdity of open borders with the rest of the world. Selfish nationalist interests again and again.
Yes, it is self interest to reject truly open borders but it is not inconsistent with preferring to remain in the EU.What an absolute joke: the same sort of people who were fighting for Remain (ergo FoM within the EU) talking about the absurdity of open borders with the rest of the world. Selfish nationalist interests again and again.
What an absolute joke: the same sort of people who were fighting for Remain (ergo FoM within the EU) talking about the absurdity of open borders with the rest of the world. Selfish nationalist interests again and again.
It's generally you and your mates who shout about Greece.Greece! Not something the remainers shout about, is it.
Greece was never bailed out – it remains a debtor’s prison and the EU still holds the keys | Yanis Varoufakis
I don't expect you, a remainer to be highlighting the shit they've been served up.It's generally you and your mates who shout about Greece.
Here comes the predictable guilt trip shit againBut you never say how brexit helps Greece
What the fuck are you on about now ??or what brexiteers plans are to help Greece after brexit. I've never heard anything about helping Greece or Greeks.
Are you asking me personally or do you think i'm the spokesman for government ?Are Greek immigrants welcome, for instance?
Yay! you win, fuck all. Whats you and your mates view on Greece? It's swerved and met with stoney silence when mentioned here. Its generally you and your sneering mate/s that ignore this. How will voting remain help Greece ?Didn't think so.
Borders are big business I think. Hence their importance. Sorry I lack sources for this.Open borders is almost certainly where we're heading we just don't know the path we will take to get there. I cant imagine a world where the most dynamic economic sectors are knowledge industries and service sectors, where information flows freely across via the internet and where international travel is increasingly easy and cheap ever really being able to put up strong borders if it is to prosper. Of course i accept that many things could slow or even temporarily reverse the tide of history and war or environmental catastrophe are threats as always, but these are just temporary wobbles. The direction of travel is clear IMHO.
Borders are big business I think. Hence their importance. Sorry I lack sources for this.
Yeh we're on the highway to hell
Yeah but globalisation depend on borders. Ie a worker in a low paid country can't leave.Isn't globalisation still increasing?
Borders exist for two reasons in the case of repressive regimes they exist to keep the population in, there aren't all that many countries left in the world now that use them for that purpose, the other reason is to keep rhe riff-raff out. Who the riff-raff are varies from country to country, In the case of places like Saudi or Iran it's to keep out people with ideas the regime finds dangerous, In the case of the USA it's largely to keep out non-Americans.Yeah but globalisation depend on borders. Ie a worker in a low paid country can't leave.
All regimes are repressiveBorders exist for two reasons in the case of repressive regimes they exist to keep the population in, there aren't all that many countries left in the world now that use them for that purpose, the other reason is to keep rhe riff-raff out. Who the riff-raff are varies from country to country, In the case of places like Saudi or Iran it's to keep out people with ideas the regime finds dangerous, In the case of the USA it's largely to keep out non-Americans.
In the case of Western Europe it's largely to keep out people from places whose average living standards are lower than ours like Africa, the Middle East or South America, mostly because we're selfish bastards and don't want to share. It's not that people from low paid countries can't leave it's that they have nowhere to go.
I use to work for a large American company that had loads of staff in 3rd world coutnries and use to deal with colleagues from India, the Philippines, Romania and Mexico on a regular basis, they didn't consider themselves exploited they may have been paid less than me but they were paid much better than the people around them and thought globalisation was great.
The people in places like that who might went to leave are the peasant farmers and their ilk and the global economy hasn't really touched those people.
All regimes are repressive
This is a bad argument. The category of illegal immigrant enables exploitation in rich countries as well as poor. People forced to live in the shadows easily exploitable by criminal gangs and criminal employers with no recourse to the law. Legal but precarious immigrants at risk of expulsion if convicted of a crime or their paperwork gets messed up. People who look or sound like they don't belong penalised daily by jobsworths and haters in ways large and small. Low income families split up if they fail the wrong tests. The nativist rhetoric feeds scrounger rhetoric and a surveillance imperative which penalises low income citizens too.mostly because we're selfish bastards and don't want to share
Perhaps post Brexit UK will strike a free trade deal with Australia for Vegemite.
Yeah but globalisation depend on borders. Ie a worker in a low paid country can't leave.