Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Brexit actually going to happen?

Will we have a brexit?


  • Total voters
    362
Freedom of movement, or as I like to think of it, no restrictions on movement is a good thing in my view.
Taking back control is not exactly the same thing, to me it suggests checks and monitoring.
you might like to think of it as no restrictions on movement but it isn't really is it. can you think of a couple of restrictions placed on freedom of movement between say the uk and france now?
 
tbf, as an EU citizen you do have freedom of movement in the EU countries. But the freedom stops when the EU citizen stops his or her "movement".
So, great for hobos or nomads but crap if you want to actually stop moving and take up residence anywhere. Most EU nations are full of restrictions when it comes to "freedom of residence". Way more than the UK.
 
Freedom of movement, or as I like to think of it, no restrictions on movement is a good thing in my view.

Do you really think that there should be no restrictions on people from Africa, India, Asia and South America moving to UK and setting up shop here? A couple of billion immigrants may increase the waiting times at your local GP.
 
tbf, as an EU citizen you do have freedom of movement in the EU countries. But the freedom stops when the EU citizen stops his or her "movement".
So, great for hobos or nomads but crap if you want to actually stop moving and take up residence anywhere. Most EU nations are full of restrictions when it comes to "freedom of residence". Way more than the UK.
You have freedom of movement but this doesn’t mean no restrictions. For example, you generally can’t claim various types of government services (eg unemployment benefit) on immediate arrival as well as your noted restrictions in residence.

Then there are the practical restrictions, such as needing to show (and thus own) a passport.

Philosophical is arguing in favour of something that doesn’t exist but also ring-fenced in any case to a small proportion of the world’s population.
 
tbf, as an EU citizen you do have freedom of movement in the EU countries. But the freedom stops when the EU citizen stops his or her "movement".
So, great for hobos or nomads but crap if you want to actually stop moving and take up residence anywhere. Most EU nations are full of restrictions when it comes to "freedom of residence". Way more than the UK.
not to mention that you can't just up and off, to get from here to france or germany you have to show a passport at least once.
 
tbf, as an EU citizen you do have freedom of movement in the EU countries. But the freedom stops when the EU citizen stops his or her "movement".
So, great for hobos or nomads but crap if you want to actually stop moving and take up residence anywhere. Most EU nations are full of restrictions when it comes to "freedom of residence". Way more than the UK.
Residence is tied to economic activity, isn't it? The richest can do what they want, but for the rest, those with FoM are entitled to get a job and with that comes qualification for residence. Those without can't. Neither can expect to live off the fat of the land without restriction, although some places allow more access to eg benefits, health or education provision than others, but only for those with FoM.
 
Abstract appeals to or demands for freedom of movement without the same for the concrete foundation which would make it possible, that is, economic equality - is just so much guff. A simple rhetorical stick with which to beat supporters of a situation you don't support and to hang them with the whiff of racism. It's pretty disgusting actually.
 
These aren’t synonymous either. Freedom of movement still comes with restrictions.

“Freedom of movement” is a defined thing. At least know what you’re fighting for.

It’s not, though, about worrying about an inconsequential flow of people who are subsequently restricted to the grey economy.

And besides, this “taking back control” thing only exists in your imagination, which is exactly why it’s so ill-defined. The rest of the population has been discussing freedom of movement — you know, the actual thing the EU insists on — not “taking back control”.

I disagree. Taking back control is used frequently by brexiters
you might like to think of it as no restrictions on movement but it isn't really is it. can you think of a couple of restrictions placed on freedom of movement between say the uk and france now?

who have no access to my imagination. One extension put out there is 'taking back control' of UK law making.

Finally enough I went to Paris on Eurostar last week. We were checked, and paperwork monitored.
 
I disagree. Taking back control is used frequently by brexiters


who have no access to my imagination. One extension put out there is 'taking back control' of UK law making.

Finally enough I went to Paris on Eurostar last week. We were checked, and paperwork monitored.
when i say i'm a reluctant remainer i mean i'm a reluctant remainer. a brexiter is different. do you read my posts before making things up?
 
You have freedom of movement but this doesn’t mean no restrictions. For example, you generally can’t claim various types of government services (eg unemployment benefit) on immediate arrival as well as your noted restrictions in residence.

Then there are the practical restrictions, such as needing to show (and thus own) a passport.

Philosophical is arguing in favour of something that doesn’t exist but also ring-fenced in any case to a small proportion of the world’s population.
not to mention that you can't just up and off, to get from here to france or germany you have to show a passport at least once.
indeed... I should have mentioned the prerequisite of owning a passport to be a hobo/ nomad enjoying the wonders of FoM in the EU.
So the reality is, that living an unrestricted life under "Freedom of Movement" generally means no home, no job, no health insurance and none of the other shit that Renton mentions at the start of Trainspotting :(
 
Must be quite a few posters here who wouldn't be around if Britain hadn't had open borders until 1905 - and open borders within the Empire/Commonwealth until 1968.

None of whose antecedents could have got here without either a small fortune of personal cash or state aid from the UK, of course.
 
I disagree. Taking back control is used frequently by brexiters


who have no access to my imagination. One extension put out there is 'taking back control' of UK law making.

Finally enough I went to Paris on Eurostar last week. We were checked, and paperwork monitored.
Do you have the first clue how to follow the thread of what you are arguing?
 
Must be quite a few posters here who wouldn't be around if Britain hadn't had open borders until 1905 - and open borders within the Empire/Commonwealth until 1968.
1962, not 68, but yes, the idea that having an open border with a large chunk of the world would lead to millions (or billions as suggested) coming here (flooding here, perhaps?) is idiotic. There was net emigration from Britain in much of that time.
 
1962, not 68, but yes, the idea that having an open border with a large chunk of the world would lead to millions (or billions as suggested) coming here (flooding here, perhaps?) is idiotic. There was net emigration from Britain in much of that time.

Must be quite a few posters here who wouldn't be around if Britain hadn't had open borders until 1905 - and open borders within the Empire/Commonwealth until 1968.

None of whose antecedents could have got here without either a small fortune of personal cash or state aid from the UK, of course.

Cost of Tunis to London today:

TUN.PNG


Can you see what may have changed in the past 70 years?
 
Back
Top Bottom