The39thStep
Urban critical thinker
Tempting but with the exception of Macron the silence says a lot.I don't know, but to be honest just ignoring him is probably the best option for them anyway.
Tempting but with the exception of Macron the silence says a lot.I don't know, but to be honest just ignoring him is probably the best option for them anyway.
Is Dictatorships supported by America real dictatorships?Please look up Chile under Pinochet.
A military dictatorship which was a "laboratory" for extreme free market policies. Thatcher was not able to go as far as Pinochet, because, as someone pointed out, you need a dictatorship to impose that kind of market "freedom". You need to be able to kill and torture those who would resist the hardship that such policies inflict.
According to the view of the world promoted by the bourgeoisie, where there is a “free market” there is freedom. Thus is that a million people could be slaughtered as democracy was overthrown in a US-sponsored military coup in Indonesia in the mid-1960s, and that country be classed as part of the “free world”. Guatemala could be part of the “free world” as a series of military regimes committed genocide over a period of thirty-six years.
A dictatorship is the opposite to a free market. Dictators invest in foreign markets but their own markets are not free. They can do anything they want in their own country with no regulations which makes it worthless in real terms and only benefits themselves.
There are no free markets as there are no command economies. As you learn in gcse economics just after you find out there's no such thing as a free lunch. And even if there were free markets why would that be a good thing?If a dictator lays claim to a country and all it’s assets how can a free market succeed in that country?
If you were to peer into the history of the last century you'd see numerous dictatorships supported by the United States. You're ignoring the auld adage that it's better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than pipe up and prove yourself one.Is Dictatorships supported by America real dictatorships?
Take for instance North Korea? Can a free market succeed in NK?
Maybe you should educate yourself instead of dribbling bollocks all over the placeFrom myself.
You know I like giving opinions and learning from replies. If you don’t stop insulting me i will no longer engage.There are no free markets as there are no command economies. As you learn in gcse economics just after you find out there's no such thing as a free lunch. And even if there were free markets why would that be a good thing?
Right. GOODBYEEEMaybe you should educate yourself instead of dribbling bollocks all over the place
Tell you what, why not add some substance to your opinions so they aren't such arrant nonsenseYou know I like giving opinions and learning from replies. If you don’t stop insulting me i will no longer engage.
You can chuck me on ignore but that won't make your opinions any more worth postingRight. GOODBYEEE
Yep, investing in foreign markets.Chinese capitalism is doing quite well.
Yes, anyone can invest in the markets.The Free Market is a theoretical fantasy isn't it. Plenty of dictators have managed to get along with capitalist economics though
Yes, anyone can invest in the markets.
No not the poor and those who are not free.That's not true is it.
I think you're confusing dictatorship with totalitarianism. They're not necessarily the same thing, although some dictatorships have been totalitarian. Dictatorships lack democratic participation (although they may include spurious democratic forms and processes). Totalitarian societies make no pretence of democracy. Dictatorships don't necessarily control all aspects of personal, public, social and economic life. Only the totalitarian dictatorships try to do this.If a dictator lays claim to a country and all it’s assets how can a free market succeed in that country?
You'll be here all day correcting their confusionI think you're confusing dictatorship with totalitarianism. They're not necessarily the same thing, although some dictatorships have been totalitarian. Dictatorships lack democratic participation (although they may include spurious democratic forms and processes). Totalitarian societies make no pretence of democracy. Dictatorships don't necessarily control all aspects of personal, public, social and economic life. Only the totalitarian dictatorships try to do this.
Tempting but with the exception of Macron the silence says a lot.
Russia is not a dictatorship. There are oppostion MPs in the Duma. It is not fully democratic, but that does not mean it is a dictatorship.Is Russia not Capitalist or is it not a dictatorship? What about Saudi Arabia?
Thanks. I never seen Socialism in Russia or the Soviet Union, only Totalitarianism. Same in NK.I think you're confusing dictatorship with totalitarianism. They're not necessarily the same thing, although some dictatorships have been totalitarian. Dictatorships lack democratic participation (although they may include spurious democratic forms and processes). Totalitarian societies make no pretence of democracy. Dictatorships don't necessarily control all aspects of personal, public, social and economic life. Only the totalitarian dictatorships try to do this.
I don’t have all day.You'll be here all day correcting their confusion
This doesn't apparently apply to all loons though does it ?The silence is the same silence the rest of use when we see loon raving in the street - there's no point arguing with a lunatic, the loon just gets more excited and becomes even more unhinged.
I don't think a few token opposition MPs means much. But how we define a dictatorship is a question we can ask. But I think we can all agree that there is no incompatibility between capitalism and dictatorship.While we are talking about dictatorship, I note that Musk has come out tr
Russia is not a dictatorship. There are oppostion MPs in the Duma. It is not fully democratic, but that does not mean it is a dictatorship.
Just the ones with a big stick.This doesn't apparently apply to all loons though does it ?
The last serious political player in the US to propose annexation of Greenland was Pat Buchanan, the paleoonservative Catholic reactionary who cut his teeth working for Nixon. Here's a list of his quotes from the late 90s which all sound very Trumpian:It's just old school colonialism (as opposed to neo-colonialism). The language used also has echoes of lebensraum.
You seem to be forgetting the adage of "Don't come across as a tit otherwise people will dismiss you as a tit", although I think you're probably too far gone to change now.If you were to peer into the history of the last century you'd see numerous dictatorships supported by the United States. You're ignoring the auld adage that it's better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than pipe up and prove yourself one.
In the words of Satchmo, "I have all the time in the world..." Fuck! Is that the time?!?!You'll be here all day correcting their confusion