Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is America heading towards dictatorship?

Please look up Chile under Pinochet.

A military dictatorship which was a "laboratory" for extreme free market policies. Thatcher was not able to go as far as Pinochet, because, as someone pointed out, you need a dictatorship to impose that kind of market "freedom". You need to be able to kill and torture those who would resist the hardship that such policies inflict.

According to the view of the world promoted by the bourgeoisie, where there is a “free market” there is freedom. Thus is that a million people could be slaughtered as democracy was overthrown in a US-sponsored military coup in Indonesia in the mid-1960s, and that country be classed as part of the “free world”. Guatemala could be part of the “free world” as a series of military regimes committed genocide over a period of thirty-six years.​
Is Dictatorships supported by America real dictatorships?

Take for instance North Korea? Can a free market succeed in NK?
 
If a dictator lays claim to a country and all it’s assets how can a free market succeed in that country?
There are no free markets as there are no command economies. As you learn in gcse economics just after you find out there's no such thing as a free lunch. And even if there were free markets why would that be a good thing?
 
Is Dictatorships supported by America real dictatorships?

Take for instance North Korea? Can a free market succeed in NK?
If you were to peer into the history of the last century you'd see numerous dictatorships supported by the United States. You're ignoring the auld adage that it's better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than pipe up and prove yourself one.
 
There are no free markets as there are no command economies. As you learn in gcse economics just after you find out there's no such thing as a free lunch. And even if there were free markets why would that be a good thing?
You know I like giving opinions and learning from replies. If you don’t stop insulting me i will no longer engage.
 
Thatcher and Reagan deregulated the markets and then we had the financial crisis which brought back regulations. Trump has said he’s going to deregulate.
 
If a dictator lays claim to a country and all it’s assets how can a free market succeed in that country?
I think you're confusing dictatorship with totalitarianism. They're not necessarily the same thing, although some dictatorships have been totalitarian. Dictatorships lack democratic participation (although they may include spurious democratic forms and processes). Totalitarian societies make no pretence of democracy. Dictatorships don't necessarily control all aspects of personal, public, social and economic life. Only the totalitarian dictatorships try to do this.
 
I think you're confusing dictatorship with totalitarianism. They're not necessarily the same thing, although some dictatorships have been totalitarian. Dictatorships lack democratic participation (although they may include spurious democratic forms and processes). Totalitarian societies make no pretence of democracy. Dictatorships don't necessarily control all aspects of personal, public, social and economic life. Only the totalitarian dictatorships try to do this.
You'll be here all day correcting their confusion
 
I think you're confusing dictatorship with totalitarianism. They're not necessarily the same thing, although some dictatorships have been totalitarian. Dictatorships lack democratic participation (although they may include spurious democratic forms and processes). Totalitarian societies make no pretence of democracy. Dictatorships don't necessarily control all aspects of personal, public, social and economic life. Only the totalitarian dictatorships try to do this.
Thanks. I never seen Socialism in Russia or the Soviet Union, only Totalitarianism. Same in NK.
 
While we are talking about dictatorship, I note that Musk has come out tr

Russia is not a dictatorship. There are oppostion MPs in the Duma. It is not fully democratic, but that does not mean it is a dictatorship.
I don't think a few token opposition MPs means much. But how we define a dictatorship is a question we can ask. But I think we can all agree that there is no incompatibility between capitalism and dictatorship.
 
It's just old school colonialism (as opposed to neo-colonialism). The language used also has echoes of lebensraum.
The last serious political player in the US to propose annexation of Greenland was Pat Buchanan, the paleoonservative Catholic reactionary who cut his teeth working for Nixon. Here's a list of his quotes from the late 90s which all sound very Trumpian:


"As for Greenland, the last great empty space in the Western Hemisphere, this huge island should remain permanently inside the US defense perimeter, and eventually be formally annexed by the US. Greenland lacks the requisites of nationhood."

That's from 1999. He also appears to think that it would have been better if UK had just left Hitler to it in 1939, which is not exactly 100% proof that he likes to raise his right arm at a 45 degree angle, but which certainly is not a good look.
 
If you were to peer into the history of the last century you'd see numerous dictatorships supported by the United States. You're ignoring the auld adage that it's better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than pipe up and prove yourself one.
You seem to be forgetting the adage of "Don't come across as a tit otherwise people will dismiss you as a tit", although I think you're probably too far gone to change now.
 
Back
Top Bottom