Is there? Is it racist to describe the men as "Arab or North African appearance"?
It's racist to make their "appearance" an issue at all.
Is there? Is it racist to describe the men as "Arab or North African appearance"?
It's racist to make their "appearance" an issue at all.
so if, say, you were sought for a driving offence you'd say that it'd be racist to say white man sought for serial running red lights.It's racist to make their "appearance" an issue at all.
for the hard of thinking, the reporter is reporting comments made by the cologne police chief.It's racist to make their "appearance" an issue at all.
if 1000 men attacked women in istanbul and they were all thought to be german it would be news wouldn't it?
i see you're studiously avoiding answering the question i put to you on page 1."Thought" by whom? On what basis?
the men or the women?if 1000 men attacked women in istanbul and they were all thought to be german it would be news wouldn't it?
so if, say, you were sought for a driving offence you'd say that it'd be racist to say white man sought for serial running red lights.
i would prefer you to answer the question i put to you on page one.But no media outlet would say that, would they?
Why not? Because when white people commit crimes, their race isn't considered relevant.
Do you really need me to tell you why that is?
"Thought" by whom? On what basis?
the men or the women?
ah sure it is in dwyerlandwell maybe they're going by witness statements
i agree that police racism may be involved in the case but reporting what the police have said isn't racism
It's racist to make their "appearance" an issue at all.
But no media outlet would say that, would they?
according to deutsche welle many of the women attacked described their assailants as of north african appearance: tbh that genie's likely out the bottle.i still don't think we should speculate on their ethnicity though, i mean it may be possible that some of a particular race and not others. And the police could be talking shit.
if it's confirmed the far right will make a huge big deal out of this. very worrying
Don't read the comments section over at MSN.
Wouldn't they? Surely if someone is being sought by police in connection with a crime, their race would be part of the description issued?
ties right into the old 'our women under threat' angle the far right are fond of.britain frist and its ilk are already pumping this out - doesnt matter what the truth is, the dots have been irreversibly joined for many.
terrible terrible outcome
In Germany the vast majority of the population is white therefore any perpetrators would be assumed to be white unless reported otherwise.A white person's race wouldn't be mentioned in the media's reporting of a crime though. Non-white people are much more likely to be identified by race, because the media assumes--and tries to inculcate the assumption--that their race was a contributory factor to their committing the crime.
This is a textbook example.
People will conclude that they attacked the women because they are North African.
no they're not. perhaps you should read the rest of the article too, which seemed to me to be quite fair.I'm surprised you can't see it.
By mentioning the alleged race of the attackers--apparently on the basis of their "appearance"--the media are inculcating the idea of a causal relation between their race and the crime. People will conclude that they attacked the women because they are North African.
And if you can't see why that's racist, you're beyond my help.
No they won't.