The poll choices would have to be:Ah, but you wouldn't be able to rank them, which is of course the key component of AV
Eh? can I assume you mean AV here?
Except, it doesn't. The question reads:A massive NO vote means hurrah for FPTP.
Answering no is not the same as saying hurrah for FPTP.At present, the UK uses the ‘first past the post’ system to elect MPs to the House of Commons. Should the ‘alternative vote’ system be used instead?
Except, it doesn't. The question reads:
Answering no is not the same as saying hurrah for FPTP.
can't argue with fairness, mind
AV is not the best system, but it will likely increase the proportion of MPs who do support PR... by returning more from outside the Labour/Conservative duopoly.
opps ! do i get a second preference ?
how is Dinsdale anyway ?
Vicious but fair. And still on the run
and Doug ?
how is AV going to return more from outside lab/con, considering AV will only benefit the lib dems and they're fucked anyway?
Indeed, but the lie will only work if it is allowed to.I'm not saying it literally means hurrah for FPTP, but that is how some will try to spin it.
AV will only benefit the lib dems and they're fucked anyway?
i'm quite baffled that most people who don't want either will be voting AGAINST AV , as it is a small step in the right direction. If the Tories get their way and AV isn't voted for, then we're stuck with FPTP forever probably....
The thing is, if you say: "I'm currently raping your wife. Would you rather I killed her instead?", the headline next day should not be "Man votes for ongoing rape of own wife".
your wife...
If I could be bothered, I would vote agaınst, ın order to annoy Clegg.
Postal or proxy. But the deadline has passed.Is it even possible to vote from abroad?
Is it even possible to vote from abroad?