Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hillsborough Independent Panel findings and release of documents.

The original inquest's cut off time totally symptomatic of the cover up that was in place. We've known for a long time that people were still alive and could have been saved. Glad to see this being recognised.
 
Some stuff from today

Charl JFT96 Hennessy (@charlhennessy1) on Twitter

On September 13 2012, Mr Bettison put out a statement following the publication of the Hillsborough Independent Panel report.
3:29 PM - 4 Apr 2016


Charl JFT96 Hennessy
@charlhennessy1

24m
In it he said: “Fans’ behaviour, to the extent it was relevant at all, made the job of police harder than it needed to be.”
View conversation·
Charl JFT96 Hennessy
@charlhennessy1

23m
He said it was hurried and ill thought through.“I regret putting our that statement in the terms I did on the day that I did.”
View conversation·
Charl JFT96 Hennessy
@charlhennessy1

23m
He then put out a clarifying statement two days later.





Charl JFT96 Hennessy
@charlhennessy1

on June 9 1989, Mr Jones wrote to the Treasury Solicitor about the behaviour and alcohol consumption of Everton fans at the semi-final at
3:44 PM - 4 Apr 2016

Charl JFT96 Hennessy
@charlhennessy1

11m
Aston Villa ground on April 15, 1989.He said: “The accounts that I have read on Liverpool supporters’ behaviour at Hillsborough shows some
View conversation·
Charl JFT96 Hennessy
@charlhennessy1

11m
remarkable coincidences which may indicate some Liverpool characteristics.”
View conversation·
Charl JFT96 Hennessy
@charlhennessy1

10m
He said he mentioned that because Lord Justice Taylor was anxious to learn as much about football as he could.
 
The last thing I'd expect is any sort of running sequence of updates, I'm still a bit surpised at the length of time needed though. It's been over ten days. I'm highly aware of the sheer complexity of it all, but still.
 
The last thing I'd expect is any sort of running sequence of updates, I'm still a bit surpised at the length of time needed though. It's been over ten days. I'm highly aware of the sheer complexity of it all, but still.
Not surprising that it takes some time to process the vast quantity of evidence they've heard.
 
The hearings were over two years, juries sometimes take two weeks to decide on a hearing that's only a few days long. They've also got a number of counts to consider, each of which will require serious consideration and weighing of evidence. Quite happy to wait a year for a fair verdict.
 
I wouldn't read anything into it. Juries in long trials form their views as the case progresses and aren't starting from scratch when they retire. The phone hacking trial lasted eight months and the jury was out for less than a fortnight.
 
Back
Top Bottom