Yes. The police are asking people not to speculate but it's hard not to wonder. JWs can be annoying for ringing the doorbell and not running away, but at a rough guess it's more likely to do with individuals at this particular kingdom hall.What an awful thing. I wonder at the motive.
I have an uncle (and a cousin) who were Jehovah’s Witnesses. My uncle joined when he was at a low ebb. He was suffering depression and young. They became his whole life. But when he left he was shunned. He had no social life outside of the Witnesses and his former “friends” would leave Post Office queues rather than share one with him.What an awful thing. I wonder at the motive.
I have an uncle (and a cousin) who were Jehovah’s Witnesses. My uncle joined when he was at a low ebb. He was suffering depression and young. They became his whole life. But when he left he was shunned. He had no social life outside of the Witnesses and his former “friends” would leave Post Office queues rather than share one with him.
It’s not hard to see how that might have some bearing here. Although of course I’m not suggesting it’s full or sufficient explanation.
I think it varies on the patient. I think most refuse whole blood, but some will accept some blood products. In the UK they tend to carry a sort of consent card or document outlining their beliefs and wishes. IIRC, there are possible alternative blood products that are specifically useful for JW's, but how useful that will be for a severe traumatic wound I wouldn't have a scooby about.I hope the Jehovah's Witnesses ban on receiving blood transfusions didn't cause any issues - I think the hospital would probably have been inclined to carry out transfusions first and determine beliefs on the matter later.