J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
Perhaps anti-racism is a stance for you; about political correctness and a good lefty education. Something you can drop or ignore if it's not convenient.
For me, it's not. I still feel the hurt even while totally supporting what he was doing. This isn't about telling the man himself of his incorrect position. But it's revealing to see who thinks this isn't a reasonable thing to consider here on this bulletin board.
Ok.
Israel is a European settler colonial state, over time while that European settler colonial state has expanded to include Jews from other areas of the world including Ethiopia it remains a settler colonial state which is racist and displaces and subjugates the Arab population which is indigenous to the area which it occupies. Asking why the man with the gun is there, the representative of that settler colonial state, and pointing that gun at him is not a bigoted question it is a rhetorical device used to question the legitimacy of violence which is enforcing an illegal occupation.
The reason people are sceptical of the fact that you are bringing it up in the first place is that what you are doing here is used often used to legitimise violence against peoples, especially peoples seen as 'backwards'.
You also seem to be reducing racism merely to 'bad words' and stripping them of all context. Stripped of all context I suppose you could see 'Yanqui go home' as a xenophobic microaggression (or whatever) but you would have to be a real idiot to accuse the Cuban or Vietnamese people of that for repeating that slogan.