Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Gender idealism?

"Idealism considersspirit (consciousness, concepts, the subject) as the source of all that existson earth, and matter (nature and society, the object) as secondary andsubordinate, Materialism recognizes the independent existence of matter asdetached from spirit and considers spirit as secondary and subordinate."

- DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM
Why are you quoting Mao? Are you not able to define materialism in your own words? You are behaving like a religious evangelist. What Mao says here is no more profound than Wikipedia.
 
You ar

Why are you quoting Mao? Are you not able to define materialism in your own words? You are behaving like a religious evangelist. What Mao says here is no more profound than Wikipedia.
The universal consensus of materialism is that it rejects the notion that all reality is formed from ideas. We have seen time and time again that many of the self-professed "socialists" are forgetting that materialism rejects idealism.

The gender idealists will say,
Yes, we may ought to abolish the traditional gender norms, but to abolish gender norms themselves may be harmful to an institution entrusted with a new gender label that is non-conforming to the conventional capitalist norms imposed on men and women. For the essence of liberation is to be isolated from capitalism with your own fantasy!
This is how these profound "progressives" mock the entire world with their postmodernist nonsense!
 
Tell us what you really think.
Very well. Based on what I understand. We are not in any way helping the people abolish gender stereotypes by letting them create their own "genders" and "pronouns". To say that the Democrats, the Fabians, the Labour Party, and any other social democratic/social liberal party is worthy of helping to "abolish gender norms" by reinforcing new ones is how the reactionary logic acts as such. Not only is it a form of division under a new name, but it really discredits socialism worldwide whenever these fools pertain to use the title "anti-capitalism" as a means of explaining why they have to reinforce gender under a new name.
 
Very well. Based on what I understand. We are not in any way helping the people abolish gender stereotypes by letting them create their own "genders" and "pronouns".

You don't seem to understand them, and on top of that, you wish to stamp on their freedom to be who they wish to be. I see.

"letting them", FFS.
 
You don't seem to understand them, and on top of that, you wish to stamp on their freedom to be who they wish to be. I see.

"letting them", FFS.
Define me what "freedom" is in your eyes?

For me, freedom is the emancipation of a society from the hands of capitalism and the withering away of the state that follows after the global downfall of capitalism.
 
But also, not letting trans people be themselves. They have to function under your rules, right?

Here is a definition of a transgender person from simple searching,
denoting or relating to a person whose gender identity does not correspond with the sex registered for them at birth.

Gender dysphoria is the material condition that drives the transgender idea. What we know of is the difference is that a tomboy is not by any means a "trans man" because she is comfortable by being a little masculine while retaining a female body. That is because it would be preposterous to reduce the notion of transgender as being something that dresses and behaves as an opposite gender for fun.

What trans people are is not the same as what tomboys and femboys are. Sure, both of them may have gender dysphoria but the difference is that trans people actually want to be the desired gender unlike tomboys and femboys who just want to dress differently and not really care about if they wanna be full-on biological men or women. Hence, the campaign for a full, free, and satisfying affirming care for trans people which is also free but fair and just is what we need to give emancipation of trans people from their gender dysphoria that they're suffering from.
 
Back
Top Bottom