So if they’re not expecting to make any money and their motivation is ‘political’ what do you think that’s about? I think it’s still all about money, ie profit, just like bezos buying Washington post, he has probably just calculated a chance worth taking that he can use it to reduce future tax legislation by shifting opinion just a bit in a way that is useful for him. So still profit, nothing else, just indirectly. Not some more interesting evil plan if you know what I mean.
Sadly, that's last week's news, and several brands that paused their advertising last week have now lifted that pause.Ha
Brands pull ads from GB News TV channel over content concerns
Ikea, Grolsch and Kopparberg have suspended adverts due to station’s perceived conflict with their valueswww.theguardian.com
Oh. Yes I haven’t read the thread. Am not that interested tbh. This channel can’t do much new harm can it, in a country where daily Mail & telegraph are so popular.Sadly, that's last week's news, and several brands that paused their advertising last week have now lifted that pause.
The main point is, these brands never actually selected & booked airtime on GBNews, they just ended-up on there, because 'Sky Media' placed them on GBN without their knowledge.
But, this has already been discussed at length on this thread.
So if they’re not expecting to make any money and their motivation is ‘political’ what do you think that’s about? I think it’s still all about money, ie profit, just like bezos buying Washington post, he has probably just calculated a chance worth taking that he can use it to reduce future tax legislation by shifting opinion just a bit in a way that is useful for him. So still profit, nothing else, just indirectly. Not some more interesting evil plan if you know what I mean.
It seems perfectly in character to me tbh. He was a shit at the Sunday Times and he's been a shit since - his brief foray into pretending he was some sort of journalist, proving it to himself by very occasionally shooting a Tory fish in a barrel (and the rest of the time being a shit) didn't work out for him given that even that was too much for them, so back to being a shit full time.It's rather amusing/sad/hatstand to see how far Andrew Neil has fallen. Once the smiter of the political elite, even gaining some plaudits among naive americans for his confrontation with Ben Shapiro. Denuded of the mantle of the BBC and its reputation, ironically, he's reduced to sitting in front of a tiny desk ranting at pablum. "Woke Watch", it'ss a far cry from holding the leaders of the major parties to account prior to a general election.
Who is the They in this ?I think they are just getting their ducks in a row ahead of time - even if the climate doesn't fall over or the economy tank (because of Brexit, the pandemic, their competence or all three) before the next election they're still going to have been in charge for fifteen years at that point. The papers are slowly circling the drain and this is the only option they have left (or at least the only option that generates jobs for them).
Who is the They in this ?
AN was actually a force for good at the ST and has earned his spurs as a great reporter ever since.It seems perfectly in character to me tbh. He was a shit at the Sunday Times and he's been a shit since - his brief foray into pretending he was some sort of journalist, proving it to himself by very occasionally shooting a Tory fish in a barrel (and the rest of the time being a shit) didn't work out for him given that even that was too much for them, so back to being a shit full time
He was but it was hidden behind the BBC veneer. Now he's thrown that aside and revealed himselfIt seems perfectly in character to me tbh. He was a shit at the Sunday Times and he's been a shit since - his brief foray into pretending he was some sort of journalist, proving it to himself by very occasionally shooting a Tory fish in a barrel (and the rest of the time being a shit) didn't work out for him given that even that was too much for them, so back to being a shit full time.
More from Hitler TV (!!!) and its right-wing apologists >>>>
GB News’ first full week averaged 50,000/0.7% in the 6am-2am all-time period and 70,000/0.5% in peak (6pm-12am). This put it fractionally behind Sky News’ all-time weekly average (52,000/0.7%) in volume but ahead of its peak average (63,000/0.5%).
Conversely, it was over 40% short of BBC News in all-time (92,000/1.2%) and peak (121,000/0.9%).
GB News’ Dewbs & Co debuted with 135,000/0.9% over two hours – by Friday it had slipped to 42,000/0.3%.
THE DAILY CLIMATE SHOW..... | Mon | 18.30 | 308,300 | 1.98% | Sky News |
NEWS HOUR - MARK AUSTIN | Mon | 17.00 | 235,700 | 2.00% | Sky News |
More from Hitler TV (!!!) and its right-wing apologists >>>>
very few mistakes half way through week 2. When they happen presenters get annoyed on air - pressure on production staff now.
Now are the anti-podiatrist but pro-hebetrist?
This seems like a particularly thankless task you've taken on.very few mistakes half way through week 2. When they happen presenters get annoyed on air - pressure on production staff now.
What you on about?It's still novel - imagine people on tv news not pretending to have home counties accents, and not shaping every sentence to make sure you won't be cancelled by their peers.
Hitler TV update: posh Remainer makes her case to ... checks notes .... Hitler >>
TBH, I don't think he knows either.What point do you think you're making?
What you on about?