Driver tried to use 'medieval rights' to get out of speeding fine
It didn't work - he was fined heavily and given points on his licence
www.walesonline.co.uk
Lol
Driver tried to use 'medieval rights' to get out of speeding fine
It didn't work - he was fined heavily and given points on his licencewww.walesonline.co.uk
Lol
The Daily Mail has an exclusive interview with this doofus. Vintage stuff
(On archive.ph) so you can read it without generating revenue for the Mail)
After trying and failing to fight the prosecution, Mr Thomas - who says he learned his defence from a Facebook group - was ordered to pay the full fine - when he could have instead completed a speed awareness course.
In total, Mr Thomas calculated that he was owed £210million for his troubles.
Larry, Curly and Moe?guy's got three first names, too.
Is ‘Hot Tedd’ his AW name?He served the police with an 161-page dossier he wrote with the help of a Facebook group
View attachment 381444
And he’s demanded the very reasonable amount of £210m from the police for the harassment he’s been subjected to.
Driver tried to use 'medieval rights' to get out of speeding fine
It didn't work - he was fined heavily and given points on his licencewww.walesonline.co.uk
Lol
... this driver is required to pay over £1,000 in various court costs, and received six points on his licence, when he was eligible for a speed awareness course outcome instead."
I think he may have failed to understand [I can stop this sentence here, but oh well...] what a Lien is. I wasn't sure myself, but here's a definition I found on a solicitor's website:He served the police with an 161-page dossier he wrote with the help of a Facebook group
View attachment 381444
And he’s demanded the very reasonable amount of £210m from the police for the harassment he’s been subjected to.
A lien is the right of a person who has lawfully received property belonging to another to retain that property for so long as a debt owed by the owner of the property remains unpaid.
Liens may be recognised by common law or may be created by contractual agreement.
Common law liens:
Liens created by contracts may improve or alter the limitations of common law rules.
- are a form of possessory security
- only grant the right to retain the goods which are subject to the lien
- don't grant the holder the power to sell the goods to discharge or reduce the debt owed
- may be asserted to retain possession of goods until the relevant charges or debt is paid.
The Daily Mail has an exclusive interview with this doofus. Vintage stuff
(On archive.ph) so you can read it without generating revenue for the Mail)
I think he may have failed to understand [I can stop this sentence here, but oh well...] what a Lien is.
Lien on me
When you're not paid
And I'll be your debtor
'N' keep your goods t'carry on...
For it won't be long
Till y'all gonna need somebody to lein on
He served the police with an 161-page dossier he wrote with the help of a Facebook group
View attachment 381444
And he’s demanded the very reasonable amount of £210m from the police for the harassment he’s been subjected to.
'I'm contesting a parking fine using FOTL arguments.'In the Mail article the bloke claims he’s already successfully contested two previous motoring/ parking fines. Which sounds like utter bullshit
And of course, the mail does not need to be truthful or honest.Granny Weatherwax said:'We're bound to be truthful, But there's no call to be honest.'
What's the group name pinkmonkey ? I may apply to join ...The Facebook group is comedy gold on one hand and tragic on the other. They discuss how to design your crest and seal (on Canva) call themselves Baron and Baroness and demand huge sums of money from the police and government ministers. The optimistic member who demanded £300 million from Rishi Sunak.
The admin is a POS, she victim blames those who say ‘it didn’t work’, it’s all their fault, they didn’t use their Baron/Baroness names all of the time, they didn’t understand the documents they were given and they didn’t try hard enough. So this is how they are blaming this idiot, he wasn’t doing it right.
I wonder if she’s in a pyramid scheme because it’s the same way they shame their victims when they complain they lost money.
FOTLer fool said:'They had weeks to reply and never replied. I also gave them an opportunity to pay me a load of money which they obviously aren't ever going to do.
All they have done is provided a picture from an ANPR camera as proof I was speeding, to me that is not proof unless a police officer was there.
There is no real victim here, who have I hurt? I do believe in the law of the land. Innately I know what is right and wrong.
I understand the courts sometimes now ask them how they would like to be addressed and use that address. It just saves time and extra nonsense. Because when you've been entertained for a little while, it gets quite boring.NoXion About your camera evidence comment, I don’t know how this guy tried to play it, but most FoL folk don’t try to undermine the evidence of the charges against them, but instead claim there’s two of them, a legal entity and a physical one, and that all offences, taxes or legal obligations levied against them fall into the non-existent legal entity. One of the main reasons they always use variations of their full name whilst in court.
Needless to say, it never, ever works
In this document (caution LONG) he calls it Magic Hat, simply put on your magic hat and you are absolved of all responsibility. https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.htmlNoXion About your camera evidence comment, I don’t know how this guy tried to play it, but most FoL folk don’t try to undermine the evidence of the charges against them, but instead claim there’s two of them, a legal entity and a physical one, and that all offences, taxes or legal obligations levied against them fall into the non-existent legal entity. One of the main reasons they always use variations of their full name whilst in court.
Needless to say, it never, ever works
NoXion About your camera evidence comment, I don’t know how this guy tried to play it, but most FoL folk don’t try to undermine the evidence of the charges against them, but instead claim there’s two of them, a legal entity and a physical one, and that all offences, taxes or legal obligations levied against them fall into the non-existent legal entity. One of the main reasons they always use variations of their full name whilst in court.
Needless to say, it never, ever works
I had an argument with someone about Autism and Vaccines on Reddit. I had a look through their posts and found the Nuremberg 2 Reddit page and it's an utter cesspit.
I had a look through their posts and found the Nuremberg 2 Reddit page and it's an utter cesspit.