you're expected to eat your jumper.You're not left with much if you spend half of it on keeping your house warm, although obviously, you're expected to wear 10 layers rather than have the luxury of switching on your heating
or sat 7 hours a day in the Jobcentre. Given IDS's behaviour at the debate I'm now convinced this shit will happen, along with the removal of the work related activity group.You wouldn't need to spend it on gas and electric if you weren't inside. You should be outside 16 hours a day traipsing the streets and looking for work. That'll warm you up
If they start really restriciting people beyond need there will be riots t the front door.This is all part of a plan for the food banks to impose further checks and restrictions on who can and who can't qualify.
my theory is that such people are themselves as defensive as they view the people they criticise. These are the people who tell people struggling to 'stop feeling sorry for themselves' and that 'other people manage'. These are statements used to deflect introspection because the resultatn self examination will reveal they are just as confused and frightened and insecure as everyone. They are in denial. Deep down they must know how fucked up the world has become but they don't want to face it.^ I have tried explaining this point to fuckwits til I'm blue in the face. They don't WANT to know the truth. It's like they use the 'scrounger' tag as a sort of talisman to ward off their own potential redundancy/poverty
Exacrtly; people don't realise how fraught benefits make life. If you're on the dole you cannot plan ahead because you don't even know from one fortnight to the next if your income will be stopped. People in work don't get treated like that; do your job badly and, presuming you don't rape your boss's cat, you will get at least a notice period of redudancy. JSA doesn't work that way and they can stop your money, on a whime, at a moments notice and leave you to try and sort it out. It was labour that changed the system to presume guilt first; prior someone whose jobsearching efforts were 'doubted' was still paid until a final decision was made (ie during the period they could appeal the decision and present their case).As long as nothing goes wrong your benefits turn up on time you or the kids dont need shoes or clothes etc etc you can survivie just but anything goes wrong and your stuffed.
remember we are all in this together
They already know and just don't care. Their pilot schemes have shown people to struggle in precisely this way. IDS of course doesn't care.I was reading about the Introduction of the Universal Benefit scheme where claimants will be paid monthly instead of the current fortnightly system. The last time I regularly signed-on I was alway broke a couple of days before my giro was due, I dread to think what kind of prelonged destitution a monthly payment scheme will cause.
Neither do they; they have yet to put that to the test.Yeah, I don't have a clue how it's going to deal with people in my situation with vastly fluctuating income patterns
Him again? Fatty Shelbrooke with a fist full of soverieng rings? I checked up his expenses last time the BBC gave him an hour's free publicity on this stupid bollocks (including sycophantic support from the odious torture apologist David Vance), his office receives Sky TV paid for on expenses and I think the state also pays for his second home to have a TV license.Yep, Plenty examples of that this morning with Alec Shelbrooke talking about his bennefit card Private Member's Bill, on
BBC 5 Live
or sat 7 hours a day in the Jobcentre.
They already know and just don't care. Their pilot schemes have shown people to struggle in precisely this way. IDS of course doesn't care.
They already know and just don't care. Their pilot schemes have shown people to struggle in precisely this way. IDS of course doesn't care.
Isn't it also interesting that the foodbank dbeate has now ignored the fact that foodbanks were and are designed only for short term support. Did McVey acknowledge this at all? Do the tories even realise this (as if they'd care)? People cannot be expected to rely on them - big society or no - because that is not how they were designed. You get 3 visits a year and then...well fuck knows!
Neither do they; they have yet to put that to the test.
Him again? Fatty Shelbrooke with a fist full of soverieng rings? I checked up his expenses last time the BBC gave him an hour's free publicity on this stupid bollocks (including sycophantic support from the odious torture apologist David Vance), his office receives Sky TV paid for on expenses and I think the state also pays for his second home to have a TV license.
Actually I love his idea; it's so fantastically stupid and unworkable that it's clear evidence of the malevolent incompetence of tories and how those at the bottom of their food chain want to be the pack alpha.
How would people pay for buses? What happens if you lose your card? What if you want to reserve a book from the library (not free), or use their printer for a CV? Or any number of other things that shut this stupid idea down.
It occurs to me this thread is actually quite old
Oh fuck it.
I have sent the following to Ms McVey:
"Dear Ms McVey
[1] Could you please when you last visited your local food bank?
[2] Did you meet any of the users? (note, users not volunteers)
[3] What did they say to you?
I intend to publish your answers and so I look forward to a speedy, comprehensive and accurate response.
Yours etc etc"
I will, of course, let you know of any reply
Should anyone else have the urge to contact Ms McVey and ask her some pertinent questions here are her details:
Tel: 0151 632 1052 / 24 Meols Drive, Hoylake, Wirral, CH47 4AN
Email: esther.mcvey.mp@parliament.uk / Web: www.esthermcvey.com
The foodbank debate has been largely ignored it seems by the BBC.
We need a general strike in this country. Fucking useless unions.
Something somewhere has got to give though, surely?The unions aren't useless, they're neutered.
Didn't they recently reject an increase in the cost of the food that was instead passed on as a cut in the wages of the staff that serve them their meals?Used to know a few freegans , but not sure how viable it would be if widely adopted,
but a load of cunts with subsidised catering and massively over inflation pay rises so they don't put their fillet mignon on expenses are always going to be wrong
Shelbrooke only wants it because he's out to make a name for himself. He's from the tory 'independent trader' breed. The type we have around here that will insure there's always a tory in power (labour has no chance locally). Rich fuckers with the power to buy up local properties and businesses and make a name for themselves as big fish in little ponds. John Derek Trotter Galt.As for the the "benefits card" not working. The fact something won't work has never stopped a politician wanting it. It only "won't work" for the people it's intended to hurt, by which logic, it DOES "work".
I rang up and complained; did fuck all though
I'm sorry, but if you can afford to fritter away your dole on ringing up...
Seriously, well done for trying.
Food bank debate saw Iain Duncan Smith and Esther McVey write their own political obituaries
The missing ministers and the jeering of Tories in the chamber showed new levels of contempt for
Ian Duncan Smith smirks as his deputy Esther McVey gives her speech
BBC
This government likes to show contempt for the poor its policies have created.
Yesterday was no exception as Tory ministers once again revealed their true nasty colours in the Commons.
Heartless Iain Duncan Smith and Esther McVey, a couple of nonentities relishing dirty jobs gifted to them by David Cameron, enjoy comfortable lifestyles yet spend their days making life harder for working people.
In a calculated snub they both vanished from the frontbench during a debate on the rise in foodbanks , the growth of which illustrates the crisis in living standards. But their actions were also a colossal misjudgment.
This undynamic duo represent Callous Conservatisim at its worst, a creed which doesn't give a damn about the plight of poor families.
Most of those struggling to pay bills in Britain are in work, doing jobs which fail to pay a living wage.
The missing ministers wouldn't get out of bed for what many people earn in a week.
Duncan Smith and McVey yesterday wrote their own political obituaries.
- Find out about our Christmas appeal supporting the Trussell Trust, who run a network of food banks across the UK .
I have sent the following to Ms McVey:
"Dear Ms McVey
[1] Could you please when you last visited your local food bank?
[2] Did you meet any of the users? (note, users not volunteers)
[3] What did they say to you?
I intend to publish your answers and so I look forward to a speedy, comprehensive and accurate response.
Yours etc etc"
I will, of course, let you know of any reply
Should anyone else have the urge to contact Ms McVey and ask her some pertinent questions here are her details:
Tel: 0151 632 1052 / 24 Meols Drive, Hoylake, Wirral, CH47 4AN
Email: esther.mcvey.mp@parliament.uk / Web: [URL='http://www.esthermcvey.com[/quote']www.esthermcvey.com[/URL]
Hoylake is very posh.
Last week, in a Commons debate on food poverty, Conservative MPs recognised the gravity of the situation. Steve Baker, the Tory MP for Wycombe, said it was a "scandalous indictment of the safety net that is the welfare state" that so many people could be left hungry. "Some 12,000 children in Buckinghamshire live in income poverty and one in five children in Wycombe go to bed hungry – that increases to one in three in some parts of my constituency," he said.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/dec/21/iain-duncan-smith-food-banks-charities
Greebo reckons Meols is posher, and Hoylake is a bit more "middle-class small 'c' conservatives, and people who think they're better than they actually are" (I'm paraphrasing).
Greebo reckons Meols is posher, and Hoylake is a bit more "middle-class small 'c' conservatives, and people who think they're better than they actually are" (I'm paraphrasing).
While we all applaud and thank the food banks, the volunteers and the people who donate food, that is not how our basic needs should be met. The basic need for food should be met through wages and a social safety net when it is needed. The basic need for housing should be met by our wages or by a social safety net when it is needed. The basic need to be able to heat one’s home and turn on the lights should be met by having a decent wage or a social safety net when it is needed.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm131218/debtext/131218-0004.htm
Apparently Rachel Reeves said this during the debate, its a bit better than her last pronouncements.
maybe the electorate can hold her to her fine words
Today I was witness to football fans bringing bags of groceries to the game to donate them to a scheme run by the Green Brigadesupporters organisation of Celtic FC. While I congratulate all concerned with getting together 5 or 6 vans worth of food together for Glasgow Food Banks I am left furious that it was necessary to do it at all!
posted on CIF
And to call IDS 'embattled'; makes it sound as if he's a good man in trying circumstances doing his best and not the evil pig ignorant shitstain lying conniving bullying cunt that we all know and hate.How on earth can the Observer say this?, they were walking out all the time, sneering, etc
Yes. The trouble is that if most people in the area are feeling the pinch, they're unlikely to be able to spare enough to donate to food banks etc on a regular basis. You get a similar problem finding volunteers to do community work (fundraising, youth groups etc) when they're having to work as many hours as they can get just to make ends meet.I though foodbanks were the natural result of the Big fucking Society idea that charities should fill the gaps left by low paying employers and shrinking benefits.<snip>
Btw, the weird thing is the public are really getting behind these food banks, I'm really not sure that is ultimately a good thing though