Ted Striker
Foot's on the other hand
I just don't know why Meghan would do this to her tbh.
She's evilI just don't know why Meghan would do this to her tbh.
Corbyn.I just don't know why Meghan would do this to her tbh.
Next you'll be telling us that Louis Armstrong did not walk on the Moon.View attachment 415652
I wasn’t going to comment on this thread again, but. People do realise that the profile of a person from a certain angle will look very much like another profile of that person from that angle, right?
For a very long time I couldn't remember the names of the Charlie/Diana/Hewitt kids, till about 5 years ago really. Not so much my anti-monarchism as my brain. Doesn't help that they go by several names, William, Wills, Will, The Duke of Something, Prince Billy...I knew one was called George, but learned the others today. I'll remember Charlotte, because it's a favourite name of mine but I've a feeling I'll forget about Louis rather quickly.
You'll have noticed that no-one has any evidence of Jeremy Corbyn and Prince Charles meeting, or being in the same location at the same time.Corbyn.
I thought it was LanceNext you'll be telling us that Louis Armstrong did not walk on the Moon.
Now you are being silly. Lance Armstrong was not even born when Apollo 11 went to the Moon.I thought it was Lance
I happened to be eating a large (vegetarian) sausage at the moment I read that. (((My appetite))))I'm picturing Baldy bonce bending over to take the snap on his bellows camera, Rose stood behind, lovingly ramming the size 9 strap-on in to the freshly greased royal annus, the groan he makes from a forceful push causing Kate and the kids to produce those beautiful, enigmatic smiles.
That's the answer! Kate now needs to wear spectacles, and the photo was amended to remove them.The Society of the (Photoshopped) Spectacle.
I just don't know why Meghan would do this to her tbh.
And how would they have fitted his bike in that small capsule.Now you are being silly. Lance Armstrong was not even born when Apollo 11 went to the Moon.
No photoshopping here
Well now you put it like that it does make you thinkYou'll have noticed that no-one has any evidence of Jeremy Corbyn and Prince Charles meeting, or being in the same location at the same time.
I would think that’s a pretty standard anarchist view. It’s pretty much mine. The elite are also damaged by the hegemony.Non-standard anarcho position: I actually feel quite sorry for her. She's had some sort of, presumably, serious surgery ( i really haven't followed it) or is having a breakdown. But she has to deploy her kids to feed the needs of the media and the institution. She has to do that, whereas Will Windsor plays a different role, doing his pre-King thing. It's the madness of the institution and the way it fucks up the family life of it's actual core family. It's royal madness with a hefty dose of patriarchy in there. It's the bullshit about duty that made the Elizabeth and Philip version of the family such a disfunctional skip fire. I mean, fuck 'em, fuck the lot of them and what they say about our society, but it's a nasty little institution in the way it twists its own children.
she's back with sweaty nonce. i don't think phil the greek liked her. No idea what chuckie thinks though.Sarah Ferguson is an exception. She betrayed them and yet she is still inside the tent.
She chose it though, it's not like Will/Harry who were groomed into it.Non-standard anarcho position: I actually feel quite sorry for her. She's had some sort of, presumably, serious surgery ( i really haven't followed it) or is having a breakdown. But she has to deploy her kids to feed the needs of the media and the institution. She has to do that, whereas Will Windsor plays a different role, doing his pre-King thing. It's the madness of the institution and the way it fucks up the family life of it's actual core family. It's royal madness with a hefty dose of patriarchy in there. It's the bullshit about duty that made the Elizabeth and Philip version of the family such a disfunctional skip fire. I mean, fuck 'em, fuck the lot of them and what they say about our society, but it's a nasty little institution in the way it twists its own children.
Chose or chosen?She chose it though, it's not like Will/Harry who were groomed into it.
I actually feel quite sorry for her. She's had some sort of, presumably, serious surgery ( i really haven't followed it) or is having a breakdown.
My view is close to Wilf 's. The Family were insular for so long, blocking outsiders from entering, and blocking members from going outside. You don't need to have watched The Crown to know what they do to outsiders: Diana, Catherine, Meghan, they're all chewed up once they've had their babies.
Sarah Ferguson is an exception. She betrayed them and yet she is still inside the tent.
I suspect Sarah Ferguson knows too much
Aye, true and when it comes to sympathy I can think of plenty of others who are ahead of her in the queue. And, for that matter, millions of people whose lives are shit because of the system she embodies. Suppose it's just like moments like this where you see the absurdity of the whole thing in fine detail. The Spectacle has to be fed, so a woman has to force her kids into a grimace with all the rough edges photoshopped off. 'Modern life' and the media colliding with monarchy, producing an idiotic image that's both banal and unpleasant.She chose it though, it's not like Will/Harry who were groomed into it.
she used to post here as acidifiedaussieAny new members here in recent months??
she used to post here as acidifiedaussie