moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
Who?
First Official Portrait of Kate Middleton
- Thread starter seeformiles
- Start date
A380
How do I change this 'custom title' thing then?
McCartney.
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
Probably because twitter noticed it, the agencies had to stop them.
Last edited:
Flavour
hang the bankers
do you not remember the submarine that exploded on its way to look at the wreck of the Titanic killing all on board last year? it was a pretty big story
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
Oh yeah remember it vaguely.
Glitter
Goddess of rock!
If I was Kate Middleton I’d be having a great time on Twitter and forums making up all sorts of shit for a laugh.
JimW
支那暗杀团
The AP notice was certainly genuine, they seem to pride themselves as sticklers to certain conventions.
emanymton
A cat politely sat on the flaming gardener.
Made all the funnier as the "story" is just that an arrogant, entitled person with far too much money and privilege is not as good at photoshop as they thought they were.
Last edited:
ElizabethofYork
Old Crone
I think this whole thing is the press being pissed off with the royal family not telling them what's wrong with Kate. They're getting their own back! They feel they own the royal family, and are entitled to know every single thing about them.
They turned on Megan and Harry when they tried to stand up for themselves, now they're doing it to the Waleses. It's very funny to watch two revolting institutions having a bunfight.
kabbes
First intersubjective, then internalised
So… everybody that was telling us the other day that this is just an artefact of what modern camera phones do, and no reason to think it’s anything other than Google Best Shot (or whatever it’s called), and it happens to me all the time too when I take photos, and etc etc… that isn’t the case now, is it? Because even the lizards are saying that yep, they actually photoshopped it.
And given that they actually uploaded it to an Apple Mac to fuck around with it in Photoshop, all bets are off. At that point, it could be what Xitter Forensic Investigator Squad X are saying, which is that it is a Vogue cover shot and the clothes are from November and the tree shouldn’t have leaves and blah blah blah. Because the one thing we know is that the picture is something created in Photoshop, which means it could be anything.
And given that they actually uploaded it to an Apple Mac to fuck around with it in Photoshop, all bets are off. At that point, it could be what Xitter Forensic Investigator Squad X are saying, which is that it is a Vogue cover shot and the clothes are from November and the tree shouldn’t have leaves and blah blah blah. Because the one thing we know is that the picture is something created in Photoshop, which means it could be anything.
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
that'll take them down a peg or two
lazythursday
Averagely-Known Member
I don't think you're right this time - the UK press happily published the picture and accepted the narrative. Then a number of global press agencies who aren't part of the Royal family - tabloid press co-dependent psychodrama decided this was obviously fishy and pulled it. If it had been left to the British press this would all still be a social media conspiracy theory.
ska invita
back on the other side
i still want to know if this was photoshopped
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
I think twitters detectives would have checked it by now. However it's so dark you can't tell it's her anyway.i still want to know if this was photoshopped
Signal 11
also programmed for conversational english
Yes, it sounds like they tried to do manually what those things try to do automatically, probably to get one with them all smiling at the same time.
T & P
|-o-| (-o-) |-o-|
i still want to know if this was photoshopped
It was. Original has just been leaked
Last edited:
lazythursday
Averagely-Known Member
Aladdin
Well-Known Member
Any new members here in recent months??
ska invita
back on the other side
semi convincing? this is 10010% for certain!
danny la rouge
I have a cheese grater in the dishwasher.
I wasn’t going to comment on this thread again, but. People do realise that the profile of a person from a certain angle will look very much like another profile of that person from that angle, right?
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
You can prove anything with so called facts
ska invita
back on the other side
talking of facts
brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
best one yet!
Idris2002
Stay Alive in '25
"This is the key shot - back and to the left. Completely inconsistent with a shot from the depository. Back and to the left".
Similar threads
