Pickmans I honestly not saying this to be a bitch, but most people just don’t work like this. They just don’t see the world like this. They are able to temper being ‘entirely factually correct’ with nuance and social skills.
Going after one thing like a dog with lock jaw isn’t helpful to either side. Honestly it’s not. Maybe you just really can’t see this. I think fundamentally your a decent bloke. You just lock on to shit almost as a proxy for actually thinking about the substantive stuff. But it totally comes across as a kind of slightly disturbing, obsessive bullying at times.
You haven't thought this through.Pickmans I honestly not saying this to be a bitch, but most people just don’t work like this. They just don’t see the world like this. They are able to temper being ‘entirely factually correct’ with nuance and social skills.
Going after one thing like a dog with lock jaw isn’t helpful to either side. Honestly it’s not. Maybe you just really can’t see this. I think fundamentally your a decent bloke. You just lock on to shit almost as a proxy for actually thinking about the substantive stuff. But it totally comes across as a kind of slightly disturbing, obsessive bullying at times.
I have social skills
Okay. Listen I’ve no interest in persuing this. It’s just my impression of you. Maybe I’m wrong. I just don’t care enough.You haven't thought this through.
I can do nuance. I can do argument. I have social skills. What I don't have is any patience with the utter bullying bollocks you've posted here.
This is about a matter of fact. Not nuance. Not opinion.
Either those posters are up, as JudithB claims, or they aren't. There's no room for nuance there. I am not attacking her beliefs but her claims of fact.
Yeh it's tedious when someone won't face their mendacity and keeps denying it. But there you go.
You think there's something wrong with me. It's not inherent, it's that I have some small regard for the truth in a debate as emotive as the trans one. I'm not so sure you do
Again you have made the assumption that my wanting to talk about feminism is an attempt to push a transphobic agenda. Women are allowed to talk about feminism without it being about trans people.
FabricLiveBaby! did it better
I missed this. I do apologise. Picky perked my attention.
If you will take your history from revisionist sites such as Transadvocates and it's follow on "theTERFS" you are going to be feel angry. This revisionist bullshit has been around since 2013/14.
Who were you before this new incarnation?
YesSignal 11
Mr.Bishie
kebabking
ginger_syn
TopCat
Pickman's model
seventh bullet
abstract1
Out of interest are you male or female?
Picky does that mean you are all male?
I am not firky I am not jazzz I cannot remember any others I might have been accused of being.
Because they are two of many I have been accused of being and remember them.So you’re so new here but can quote those two names?
i'm a female, why?Signal 11
Mr.Bishie
kebabking
ginger_syn
TopCat
Pickman's model
seventh bullet
abstract1
Out of interest are you male or female?
Janice wrote her book in the 70's and I am trying to find a recent podcast with Stone which suggests she is still very angry.Then how come i was aware of it at around the turn of the century?
OK to make it simpler for those at the back.i'm a female, why?
Fuck off Judith.
Any attempt to challenge the substance of what I might say will very quickly become an excuse for you to shout bigot and transphobe. I have opinions. I look at evidence and have drawn conclusions. If some one was to offer me other evidence I would look at it and possibly draw other conclusions. Nothing remotely connected to the topic is discussed afaik without it quickly becoming personal name calling. I shall "curate" this thread and make it the Come and Call Me a Bigot and Transphobe thread. If you want to call me a man, someone you previously had beef with or any other manner of descriptors, here's the place to do it. I hope that makes everyone feel better.
(Victim, hysterical they're good to go words too)
Janice wrote her book in the 70's and I am trying to find a recent podcast with Stone which suggests she is still very angry.
Your theories are a huge amount of bull mixed in with the history of all this. It really does remind me of other conspiracy theories- a deep dark rabbit hole.
Sandy Stone has connections to Donna Harroway of Cyborg Manifesto fame. So erm yeah.
The Transsexual Empire probably provides all the so called propaganda about terfs and it could be said is the result of a nasty personal beef between Stone and Janice.
I am indebted to Janice G. Raymond for her pioneering book, The Transsexual Empire (1994, fi rst published 1979). Her work is the foundation on which feminist criticism of transgenderism has been built, and continues to inspire radical feminist thought.
Woah. Hold up. These are sensitive things.OK to make it simpler for those at the back.
Do you have the same genitalia as the person who birthed you? If you are intersex (and I apologise to my sister if I am now insensitive) did the tests you had when you were a tiny baby of a day or so old confirm you were male or female?
Did that make the question simpler?
OK to make it simpler for those at the back.
Do you have the same genitalia as the person who birthed you? If you are intersex (and I apologise to my sister if I am now insensitive) did the tests you had when you were a tiny baby of a day or so old confirm you were male or female?
Did that make the question simpler?
I don't have any theories, I have my opinion on the testimonies of those around at the time which I believe to be reasonably accurate and largely undisputed by either side.
To be clear, you are calling Sandy Stone a liar, and this is based on the fact she knew someone you disagree with? Is that a fair summary of why you reject her testimony?
No it wasn't, it was based on Raymond's dissertation and produced under the guidance of Mary Daly and it is recognised by many of your contempories, including Sheila Jeffreys who has spoken at many of the recent ant GRA reform meetings, as the foundational text of gender critical feminism. In her 2014 book Gender Hurts, Jeffreys opens her acknowledgements with this:
You are right though, I got the date it was published wrong. Sorry about that.
Here we go.