ManchesterBeth
Well-Known Member
You're out of order.
So? what you gonna do about it?
You're out of order.
I'm going to suggest that you step away for a while. I read your article, it was interesting, but this is probably not the best thread for it.So? what you gonna do about it?
Ok what planet is this?
Unwatching thread.
I am unsure if you are rude to other people in the same way. I am going to make an assumption you are probably not as rude to people with penises.That article has fuck all to do with intersectionalism. rather than froth at the mouth talking about people with no penises, have some fucking empathy for people in the food industry (predominantly women by the way) who work to getting your poxy English food to you at a just in time rate with very little to no English language skills, something you would know if you weren't a shit stirrer. not just another country in Africa, right on your doorstep in West London.
why separate them off from one another? The nature of women's oppression, and of racism, both come from the introduction of 'modern' capitalism and the changes required to end feudal support systems. It cannot be sensibly discussed 'outside of' capitalism - just as you can't sensibly talk about ending capitalism without also talking about ending it's patriarchal and racist bedrocks. They are all intimately connected. Federici is spot on on this.
To be fair he's rude to everyone without regard for their sexI am unsure if you are rude to other people in the same way. I am going to make an assumption you are probably not as rude to people with penises.
Thank you for taking the time to elucidate some of the points of the article you posted.
FYI I do not live in West London
To be fair he's rude to everyone without regard for their sex
Perhaps you could get 30 feet behind it or at least 30 feet from a computer or mobileNow that's some pedantry i can get behind!
Perhaps you could get 30 feet behind it or at least 30 feet from a computer or mobile
This is a condition oft repeated in organisations. Sex segregation. Men and women perform different jobs and women's jobs are undervalued because they are performed by women.My experience, which is not unique, is that middle management is almost entirely made of white middle class men, and whilst there is a single very well paid woman director, women are almost never promoted. We just aren't considered. But because of the one female director who earns fucktons, the stats don't look too bad. Or as my manager says 'there's no sexism here. Look at the gender pay gap statistics!' This was shortly after I'd requested something from a male colleague and been told to 'say pretty please!' So yeah, no sexism apparently, I must be hysterical or something to even consider it.
Why do you go from 0 to 90 like this all the time? You're like an angry shouty child who want his voice to be louder than everyone else's. Why don't you converse with people with a bit more kindness in your words like the way you would like someone to talk to you?That article has fuck all to do with intersectionalism. rather than froth at the mouth talking about people with no penises, have some fucking empathy for people in the food industry (predominantly women by the way) who work to getting your poxy English food to you at a just in time rate with very little to no English language skills, something you would know if you weren't a shit stirrer. not just another country in Africa, right on your doorstep in West London.
Why do you go from 0 to 90 like this all the time? You're like an angry shouty child who want his voice to be louder than everyone else's. Why don't you converse with people with a bit more kindness in your words like the way you would like someone to talk to you?
You're a bright lad but no-one engages with you because you rant like rude kid from the Vis.
I am a mother who breastfed each time and also used the attachment method by mistake. Whatever works for a mother.I’m really really glad you said this. Because part of what I’d like to see happen is women properly supported in staying home with their babies and small kids. That having to put them in childcare despite baby crying at drop off, and Mum crying round the corner as soon as she’s ten steps away, is shite.
This is a condition oft repeated in organisations. Sex segregation. Men and women perform different jobs and women's jobs are undervalued because they are performed by women.
This is galling insomuch as historically women were paid less as they were expected to prioritise domestic duties allowing the men to be the main bread winners. Nowadays it is a useful tool of capitalism to keep wages down and a great deal of care work inside the home relatively free. Wherein most households need both wages to remain out of poverty and there are a fuckton of women who are not married/cohabiting and do not have dependents.
Of course sexual division of labour inside the home is still unchallenged and the patriarchal system of work, organised on the assumption that the protype worker is male, creates a situation removed from reality by an unconcious internalised fantasy of the working man supporting his wife and children on a family wage.
Yes, parents are still expected to act as if there were two of them, even though there's often only one, and still expected to act as if the woman is the main caregiver.
I wouldn't say it's unchallenged though. It is challenged. But it has been for ages and it doesn't seem to have moved on that much in the past thirty years. We were challenging it then and we still have to challenge it now. View attachment 168698
Interesting. Ta.
I concurInteresting. Ta.
Can't find the posts now, but someone mentioned foster carers. Totally agree with that. My Mum was a foster carer for over 30 years and had to fight for her pension as they didn't want to her pay her properly claiming it wasn't work. Luckily there is organising going on now to try and fight this stuff. My Mum never asked for a penny of what she was entitled too beyond the minimum and they still tried to rip her off at the end.
In regards to care and social work. It's something that has been getting on my nerves for a while. We need to challenge the idea that it is "unskilled" work that anyone can do competently. It's a long road, but again I am seeing signs of resistence which can only be a good thing.
Never knew that fosters carers got a pension. Dont know why I didn't know that...
The problem with EQ is that it assumes there is a context-free objective standard against which an individual can be judged. As the link notes, practical intelligence is domain-specific and learner-specific. The other problem with EQ is that (although it is not necessarily intended as such) it implies something inherent rather than learned. In Sternberg’s approach, the whole thing is conceptualised as developed abilities, not innate or otherwise fixed qualities. I think it’s a far more powerful way of thinking about the wider nature of human intelligence.I concur
I was judging EQ levels which do not seem to be covered by Sternberg's theory
I'm giving you a week off from this thread.Pretty easy with a wireless keyboard that.
Could be anything. But think “I can’t be what I can’t see” except on the scale of the full spectrum of behaviour, not just job aspiration.Thanks
Can you expand on modelled alternatives are they societal or individual?