8ball
Decolonise colons!
Not sure why so many assume Evergrande is a bank. It's a real estate company.
Mostly phrasing, I guess. Lots of the news headlines sort of look similar to headlines from 2008.
Not sure why so many assume Evergrande is a bank. It's a real estate company.
Mostly phrasing, I guess. Lots of the news headlines sort of look similar to headlines from 2008.
Not for much longer I thinkActually it is both a real estate company and a bank.
Not sure why so many assume Evergrande is a bank. It's a real estate company.
It's not another Lehman moment. There isn't remotely the amount of contagion that existed when Lehman failed.
The Lehman comparison prompted me to revisit the Lehman thread on here that ran from August to September 2008, and it's startling to see the amount of false information flying around at the time - starting with the reports that 5,000 Lehman UK staff lost their jobs on the day the bank failed. There were in fact no redundancies at all that day.
Does anyone know if the poster who promised to stand naked in Broadgate for an entire Friday afternoon if Lehman failed made good on his/her promise?
Chinese corporate debt is absolutely massive with the largest debt to GDP ratio in the world, double that of the US, and is also bad quality debt, unlikely to be repaid.
Super Imperialism by Michael Hudson is good on this.Who are these Chinese companies in debt to? I thought the US was massively in debt to China.
Evergrande isn't an SOE, so it'll owe domestic and international bond holders.The larger America’s balance-of-payments deficit becomes, the more dollars end up in the hands of European, Asian and Near Eastern central banks, and the more money they must recycle back to the United States by buying U.S. Treasury bonds.
Over the past decade American savers have been net sellers of government bonds, putting their own money into the stock market, corporate bonds and real estate. Foreign governments have been obliged to hold U.S. bonds whose interest rates have fallen steadily, while their volume now exceeds America’s ability or willingness to pay.
It's not another Lehman moment. There isn't remotely the amount of contagion that existed when Lehman failed.
I have heard 2025 mentionedThere is a risk that Beijing may decide the window of opportunity for taking Taiwan is shrinking and they need to take action sooner rather than later. Xi's third term is the danger zone - if war can be averted for the next 5 years then that the window of opportunity where China could take Taiwan will close for the foreseeable future.
Not entirely sure about this... anyone?