Silas Loom
Man with glasses
I'll take a bet on the second, what odds are you offering?
Not terribly generous ones.
I'll take a bet on the second, what odds are you offering?
There was a similar disaster in Florida about 20 years ago I think? All bridges built since then have had to include defences. This bridge was older, and there was no legal requirement to retrofit.Bridge went down in seconds.
Surely ships should never have been allowed anywhere near it if it was that easy to collapse.
Or some sort of defences mounted around supporting pillars.
Terrorists will be looking at this and thinking hmmm we could do this somewhere else.
But a moral one.There was a similar disaster in Florida about 20 years ago I think? All bridges built since then have had to include defences. This bridge was older, and there was no legal requirement to retrofit.
Florida skyway bridge. There was also a train bridge that got struck many years ago causing a passenger train to plunge into the bayouThere was a similar disaster in Florida about 20 years ago I think? All bridges built since then have had to include defences. This bridge was older, and there was no legal requirement to retrofit.
As night follows day
Maybe he watched Leave The World Behind last night
Bridge went down in seconds.
Surely ships should never have been allowed anywhere near it if it was that easy to collapse.
Or some sort of defences mounted around supporting pillars.
Terrorists will be looking at this and thinking hmmm we could do this somewhere else.
Governor Moore says the ship was moving towards the bridge at a "very rapid speed".
He said crews called a "mayday' - an emergency signal - but the vessel's speed appeared to be too fast to avoid the incident.
However, he said the distress call did ensure more cars were stopped from crossing the bridge, averting greater disaster.
"These people are heroes," he said. "They saved lives last night."
-
Six people are unaccounted for, officials tell reporters. This is down from a previous report of seven.
Two other people were found - one was taken to hospital, and the other was uninjured.
The state transportation secretary says the six are believed to be part of the construction crew that was working on the bridge [fixing potholes] at the time it collapsed.
He adds that officials do not believe there is anyone missing that was in a vehicle when the span fell.
This does not exist in conspiracyland, cannot be the answer. More research needed.Human error maybe.
Bringing down even a large bridge is ridiculously easy. With many bridges, such as the Forth Crossing, blowing the cables will bring down the structure. The cut cables will automatically 'whip' into the towers, and the structure will collapse.
Fifty pounds of gelignite per cable should suffice, and there is a quarry with a magazine just a few miles away...
On the BBC news the same ship has previously collided with a dock in Amsterdam.
blowing a bridge doesn't take that much explosives if you get to place them got roped into help setting up a dummy reserve demolition once hanging off the bottom of a bridge shoving fake plastic explosive in place. our wartime role was to stop Russia Paras seizing the bridge. not exatcly how the Paras were meant to fly through Western German airspace in the middle of ww3!Bringing down even a large bridge is ridiculously easy. With many bridges, such as the Forth Crossing, blowing the cables will bring down the structure. The cut cables will automatically 'whip' into the towers, and the structure will collapse.
Fifty pounds of gelignite per cable should suffice, and there is a quarry with a magazine just a few miles away...
I've had a fascination for blowing things up all my life, pretty much.You've put a worryingly large amount of thought in to this Sas.
I've had a fascination for blowing things up all my life, pretty much.
Ranging from blowing the windows out of the garage when my gunpowder went a bit wrong, to getting 'buried' in a culvert after firing 400 lbs of gelignite in a rock cutting.
My only two convictions were under (IIRC) the 1886 Explosives Act.
blowing a bridge doesn't take that much explosives if you get to place them got roped into help setting up a dummy reserve demolition once hanging off the bottom of a bridge shoving fake plastic explosive in place. our wartime role was to stop Russia Paras seizing the bridge. not exatcly how the Paras were meant to fly through Western German airspace in the middle of ww3!
No, and it probably just as well for the general wellbeing of the populace.Are you related to dessiato?
looks to be on a major trunk road/ring road
My only two convictions were under (IIRC) the 1886 Explosives Act.
Well, if you weren't before, you're on a watch list now.I've had a fascination for blowing things up all my life, pretty much.
Ranging from blowing the windows out of the garage when my gunpowder went a bit wrong, to getting 'buried' in a culvert after firing 400 lbs of gelignite in a rock cutting.
My only two convictions were under (IIRC) the 1886 Explosives Act.
yeh so it is to me surprising you were a nurse and not in the royal engineers.I've had a fascination for blowing things up all my life, pretty much.
Ranging from blowing the windows out of the garage when my gunpowder went a bit wrong, to getting 'buried' in a culvert after firing 400 lbs of gelignite in a rock cutting.
My only two convictions were under (IIRC) the 1886 Explosives Act.