Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Genoa bridge collapse -14th August, dozens feared dead

Wonder if it could be one of those big construction projects the Mafia often ran, with associated poor building standards and dodgy concrete? Big construction contracts are / were a huge source of funds for the mob. Just a thought.

35 dead now :(
 
Although not on the scale of this disaster but there have two other fatal road bridge collapses in Italy within the last two years.
 
Wonder if it could be one of those big construction projects the Mafia often ran, with associated poor building standards and dodgy concrete? Big construction contracts are / were a huge source of funds for the mob. Just a thought.

35 dead now :(

Northern Italy not so mafia-ary as the south. Old bridge, seemingly undergoing some kind of maintenance...
 
Some had an amazing escape:

A stretch of the road, estimated by some witnesses to be more than 300 feet long, fell to earth in a huge dust cloud. Remarkably, some people driving on the bridge walked away unharmed.

“I am a miracle,” one of them, Davide Capello, told the Turin newspaper La Stampa. He said he was driving to the city when “I heard a noise first and everything collapsed.” His car fell and came to rest wedged between massive pieces of debris, yet he was unhurt.
 
When I did my Civil Engineering degree we seemed to get shown footage of the Tacoma Narrows bridge collapse about once a month in some lecture or another, it’s pretty much etched in my brain. Occasionally we’d get the Hyatt Regency walkways collapse.

It’s sad that there seems to be many more recent examples of engineering failures to choose from now, this one, that footbridge in Florida being recent examples.
 
1900 years ago they didn't have EU-enforced austerity preventing them from investing in infrastructure.

I hate the EU but to blame this on EU-enforced austerity is completely ridiculous. Corruption, cronyism, nepotism and gross negligence by Italian State actors are to blame way before the EU is. It lets the Italian Ministry of Transport off the hook. Italy consistently ignores the EU's budget police.
 
I went to Segovia the other day. The aqueduct there looks like it was built last week and is indeed 1900 years old.
Same as the Pont du Gard but in fairness all of these Roman structures have been rebuilt/remodelled a few times in the last 2000 years, no longer carry massive loads and are probably better maintained as tourist attractions than many modern, functional structures.
 
Quite likely this is down to a design flaw with this particular type of bridge (not only weakening the structure, but also hampering maintenance, assuming authorities were willing to stump up sufficient money for such in the first place). This much has been noted in the engineering literature for some years.

The Morandi bridge designs (he was an Italian engineer and designed several similar bridges) tend to feature very few stays:
640px-Ponte_Morandi.jpg


Elegant but increasingly risky as the bridge ages - there is no safety net and repair/replacement of the stays is incredibly difficult and expensive. Modern designs use curtains of stays (eg the new Forth Queensferry Crossing) so the failure of one or two cables/stay anchors is highly unlikely to lead to a cascading failure and those that need replacing can easily be swapped out without significantly heightening the risk of failure nor requiring a lot of costly hoop jumping to achieve.

Speculative: the initial driver for the Morandi/Polcevera collapse event - some combination of the prevailing storm (wind loading in a microburst?), ageing infrastructure (rust burst weakening the concrete through undesigned-for tensions), maybe additional holiday traffic load, perhaps even an accident on the deck (poor visibility, wet surface) immediately weakening and tipping a stay into failure? (edit: Also, it used prestressed concrete, so ready to give in a big way if the stays/tendons fail.)

Anyone who has driven round the roadways that spaghetti around Genoa in recent years will have noticed how unloved they are, as are a number of other items of transport infrastructure in some other Italian regions.
 
Last edited:
You're doing that thing where it's all the EU's fault, it's not helpful. More interesting: the Benetton family (as in United Colors of) has a big stake in this. They are the largest shareholder in Atlantia, the company which owns and runs the Italian motorway system.
 
This bridge appears to be on a toll road. Not unreasonable to wonder where all that money collected has gone to because it doesn't appear that much of it was spent on regular inspections and maintenance.
 
This bridge appears to be on a toll road. Not unreasonable to wonder where all that money collected has gone to because it doesn't appear that much of it was spent on regular inspections and maintenance.
It’s the A10 (E80) motorway - most motorway in Italy is pay-as-you-go toll. Though charges can tend to disappear as one heads further south. The only bit I recall driving on that was ‘toll free’ was in Sicily where no one bothered to staff the booths and there were no automated means of payment collection (can’t think why! :rolleyes:).
 
I went to Segovia the other day. The aqueduct there looks like it was built last week and is indeed 1900 years old.

I suspect 1960s Italy didn’t have enough slave labour to construct a 50m high motorway bridge out of traditional stone masonry, hence a more efficient structural method was used. Shame, it might have been quite pretty.
 
I suspect 1960s Italy didn’t have enough slave labour to construct a 50m high motorway bridge out of traditional stone masonry, hence a more efficient structural method was used. Shame, it might have been quite pretty.

Don't like your definition of efficient in the circumstances.
 
Back
Top Bottom