Dr. Furface
One small step for me
You don't think they would have braked hard?!yeh the lorry is stationary
You don't think they would have braked hard?!yeh the lorry is stationary
As I say, they made it, the lorry can be seen on the bridge in other post-collapse photosHope they made it.
I neither know nor - frankly - do I much careYou don't think they would have braked hard?!
Wonder if it could be one of those big construction projects the Mafia often ran, with associated poor building standards and dodgy concrete? Big construction contracts are / were a huge source of funds for the mob. Just a thought.
35 dead now
Some had an amazing escape:
A stretch of the road, estimated by some witnesses to be more than 300 feet long, fell to earth in a huge dust cloud. Remarkably, some people driving on the bridge walked away unharmed.
“I am a miracle,” one of them, Davide Capello, told the Turin newspaper La Stampa. He said he was driving to the city when “I heard a noise first and everything collapsed.” His car fell and came to rest wedged between massive pieces of debris, yet he was unhurt.
the bridge in genoa wasn't even 50 years auld.
this roman bridge in spain is an auld bridge
View attachment 144064
the bridge in genoa wasn't even 50 years auld.
it'd be a great pity if italian bridge building now was worse than it was 1900 years ago.I'm guessing that bridge probably doesn't carry the same loads as the one that collapsed.
it'd be a great pity if italian bridge building now was worse than it was 1900 years ago.
it'd be a great pity if italian bridge building now was worse than it was 1900 years ago.
1900 years ago they didn't have EU-enforced austerity preventing them from investing in infrastructure.
Same as the Pont du Gard but in fairness all of these Roman structures have been rebuilt/remodelled a few times in the last 2000 years, no longer carry massive loads and are probably better maintained as tourist attractions than many modern, functional structures.I went to Segovia the other day. The aqueduct there looks like it was built last week and is indeed 1900 years old.
Isn't that the fascist salvini's line?1900 years ago they didn't have EU-enforced austerity preventing them from investing in infrastructure.
I went to Segovia the other day. The aqueduct there looks like it was built last week and is indeed 1900 years old.
Isn't that the fascist salvini's line?
It’s the A10 (E80) motorway - most motorway in Italy is pay-as-you-go toll. Though charges can tend to disappear as one heads further south. The only bit I recall driving on that was ‘toll free’ was in Sicily where no one bothered to staff the booths and there were no automated means of payment collection (can’t think why! ).This bridge appears to be on a toll road. Not unreasonable to wonder where all that money collected has gone to because it doesn't appear that much of it was spent on regular inspections and maintenance.
I went to Segovia the other day. The aqueduct there looks like it was built last week and is indeed 1900 years old.
I suspect 1960s Italy didn’t have enough slave labour to construct a 50m high motorway bridge out of traditional stone masonry, hence a more efficient structural method was used. Shame, it might have been quite pretty.