we're doing our best with the material we've been providedThis is shit.
Who would be the big 6 if the current big 6 go into their cosy little league . Villa? West Ham? Everton? Leicester ? Wolves? Leeds?
Indeed, I keep mentioning him but it's such a criminal waste that Shaqiri hasn't played more - I loved what (little, on MotD) I saw of him at Stoke and the rare times except sub that he plays at Liverpool he's got delightful skills. Virtually an end to his career when he went to LiverpoolThis is one of the many ways in which the system has already fucked up football. It's not so long ago that the idea of 'rotation' was almost unheard of. Man U started it, pretty much, in the 90s, when they rotated four strikers - Yorke, Cole, Sherringham, Solskaer. Now the top teams have at least two top players for every position. Meaning the rest of the teams have fewer players to choose from. Even top internationals like Raheem Stirling can struggle to get regular matches. We're all short-changed by the quality sitting on the bench rather than on the pitch.
Something like this idea would only move that situation even further.
Indeed, I keep mentioning him but it's such a criminal waste that Shaqiri hasn't played more - I loved what (little, on MotD) I saw of him at Stoke and the rare times except sub that he plays at Liverpool he's got delightful skills. Virtually an end to his career when he went to Liverpool
That's what the big clubs do though isn't it. Suck up the best players from other clubs to give their bench quality
Yeah, as you say he's a millionaire but it's hard not to like him. His instincts are usually spot on and his rants are great. This one was word perfect and he looked like he was on the edge of tears.Hard not to agree with him . He is a millionaire property developer who co-owns a club but you do get the feeling that whilst he is not against money and profit in football he is against those two things overriding everything.
It is sort of making me wonder - I suppose United fans do sort of have somewhere else to go, as in FCUM. Is there any possibility of similar things happening elsewhere? Like, could City fans who just want to watch football go off to Maine Road, for instance?Legacy fans , legacy working class. As Mandelson once said of the latter but its true of the former 'they've got nowhere else to go'
Not literally, it's a housing development now.It is sort of making me wonder - I suppose United fans do sort of have somewhere else to go, as in FCUM. Is there any possibility of similar things happening elsewhere? Like, could City fans who just want to watch football go off to Maine Road, for instance?
Just said similar to some mates. It's always galling to see the controlling bodies of football talk about protecting the sport against self-interest and corporate greed.On the bigger picture it's hard coming down on the side of the PL and Uefa. They are neoliberal cunts and have taken us to where we are now.
Don't see how that prevents us playing football. Privet hedges for goalpostsNot literally, it's a housing development now.
Oh yeah, Maine Road play at Brantingham Road now. It's like MK Dons all over again.Not literally, it's a housing development now.
Which is why I'd like to hear the likes of FIFA spell out precisely why they are against itJust said similar to some mates. It's always galling to see the controlling bodies of football talk about protecting the sport against self-interest and corporate greed.
Fuck 'em. Our reactions to the news may look largely similar on the surface, but they're coming from very different places.
You could have a league with only Arsenal, Juventus, Inter and AjaxJust seen this on the Guardian site
George Davidson emails in an interesting thought: “National government may have limited formal powers to stop any super league. But local government may have more, stronger and long forgotten powers. Football Clubs use the name of their towns and cities with the permission of the local council. If Liverpool Council decides it no longer wants Liverpool FC to bear its name, then they could withdraw that right. The club could still exist and play in the new ESL but call itself something else (Red Mersey?) but they could no longer call itself Liverpool. That would be an utterly extraordinary move but maybe even the threat would be something.”
Like PES in real life. God, that would be amazing.Just seen this on the Guardian site
George Davidson emails in an interesting thought: “National government may have limited formal powers to stop any super league. But local government may have more, stronger and long forgotten powers. Football Clubs use the name of their towns and cities with the permission of the local council. If Liverpool Council decides it no longer wants Liverpool FC to bear its name, then they could withdraw that right. The club could still exist and play in the new ESL but call itself something else (Red Mersey?) but they could no longer call itself Liverpool. That would be an utterly extraordinary move but maybe even the threat would be something.”
Oh, 'liked' before the editAs an aside, it'll be interesting to see if any current footballers at the 6 clubs voice their concerns. At United I'm thinking Rashford and Mata. Rashford is pretty secure and already has a bit of latitude when it comes to 'political' stuff. Mata is probably at the end of his United career so he'll either keep zip to get a new contract or come out and say something if he knows he's already out.
EDit: Rashford has retweeted some guff about prince philip, so maybe not.
Just how much of the "we want to be in control, and largely in possession, of the money" truth will seep through whatever romanticised, cliched tripe they come out with.Which is why I'd like to hear the likes of FIFA spell out precisely why they are against it
Also a very good point.Id be interested to know what the projected carbon footprint of this league would be....a lot of flights for sure.