Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

European Super League (again)

Rumours are that PSG and RB Leipzig are two of the three still to join (RB Leipzig aren't subject to the German 50%+1 rule). Probably Ajax too I'm guessing, although Edwin Van Der Sar is their CEO and he's the mastermind behind UEFA's new CL format, so maybe not.
Bayern Munich also rumoured
 
It's bullshit, hoping this is just a negotiating ploy. Don't think the rest of the PL would stand for it.

They've lobbed a grenade at the PL with the pin still in. If the PL takes the pin out by throwing them all out, it destroys itself too. PL TV rights will be worth about £4.50 without those 6 clubs.

No football fan in this country wants to watch a series of exhibition matches where there is no consequence to coming last (for the 'founders'). But the people driving this don't care about football or football fans, whatsover. If the global market is where the money, and it will buy this non-competition, they will happily sell the game as we know it out in it's entirety.

Wankers.
 
I am a life long gooner but am totally against this shit. It is being beaten by Yeovil Town et al that makes it exciting. Fuck this bollocks it is not right. Surely there is enough cash in it already to satisfy the owners.

I would be happier if they introduced what some German clubs have at a 51% ownership by fans.
 
No it is about money but leave the books out of it. Football fans will be against this whether they have read about neoliberals or not.
Absolutely the last thing we want is football supporters having a political view, any understanding of what economics that drive the sport they are involved in. They'll be demanding supporter ownership next and the redistribution of income to supporting and developing grassroots football, caps on ticket prices, TV subscriptions merchandising and controls on kick-off times.
 
Absolutely the last thing we want is football supporters having a political view, any understanding of what economics that drive the sport they are involved in. They'll be demanding supporter ownership next and the redistribution of income to supporting and developing grassroots football, caps on ticket prices, TV subscriptions merchandising and controls on kick-off times.
Yeah but... It is great in theory but keep sucking your lollypop.
 
The other thing I've noticed this year particularly is that all the clubs in the premiership have at least one really gifted player. I think they'd all just move up a notch.

Interesting if players were banned from internationals though, I can't see it but would make the World Cup interesting :)
 
The other thing I've noticed this year particularly is that all the clubs in the premiership have at least one really gifted player. I think they'd all just move up a notch.

Interesting if players were banned from internationals though, I can't see it but would make the World Cup interesting :)
Be hilarious if they were booted out of the Premier league 🤣 but can't seeing this amounting to anything , every few years there's talk of a super league.
 
Hell of a lot of games if they're playing in premiership as well - would they just play their reserves there so the only time people would see the stars is in the European games? I'm sure sky would be delighted to triple the pay-per-view prices and screen them all.
 
No it is about money but leave the books out of it. Football fans will be against this whether they have read about neoliberals or not.

What are you going on about?

On the topic itself this isn't a surprise. I caught the 90"s wave of football when it started changing. Obviously I was a kid with rose tinted glassses, but the last few times I've been to City it's felt so dead and different to what I remember. This trajectory has been building for a long time.

This is probably just posturing, but it shows how much power these clubs have.
 
It's bullshit on so many levels. The Champions League is already a closed shop, just one that hands out "participant" rosettes to the occasional plucky underdog. The format is such that in any given year the last 16 will include:
4 x English clubs
Barcelona, Real Madrid, Atletico Madrid
Juventus
Bayern Munich, Borussia Dortmund
PSG
+ 5 others; not set in stone but highly likely to include Ajax, Inter Milan and Porto.

England is (as per usual) the problem child in the equation. 6 into 4 doesn't go, and upstarts like Leicester and (gulp) West Ham don't help.

With apologies for a Spurs-centric point of view (they're my team and those I know best) it pisses me off even more than it otherwise would because we battled so hard to become one of the "big 6" from the outside. Before Man City's oil wealth, the top 4 was a closed shop in monetary terms anyway - Chelsea, Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal - from the Martin Jol era of around 2005, we were in a completely different financial league from those 4 with their annual CL income, but we competed and chipped away at the top, finishing 4th and 5th a few times, until the mid 2010s when we were genuinely starting to mix at the top with a few top 3 places. We of all clubs should see what Leicester are doing and welcome it as sporting competition, not a financial threat.

Leicester have spent the past 5 years doing the same and even better(they won the bloody thing after all!) and if they continue to be well run could conceivably be the next interlopers, the generational shift in who the "big" clubs are. West Ham could be currently in their first season of doing the same. To pull the ladder up and deny them that opportunity stinks, it really fucking stinks.

Even if there are sanctions (e.g. no players for internationals) it will still stink. There will be the players who want to play at world cups, there will be the players who want to play against Barcelona and Real Madrid. Opening up the European Cup to ever-increasing numbers of non-Champions was one thing but this is next level fucking up of the game.
 
Hell of a lot of games if they're playing in premiership as well - would they just play their reserves there so the only time people would see the stars is in the European games? I'm sure sky would be delighted to triple the pay-per-view prices and screen them all.
This is one of the many ways in which the system has already fucked up football. It's not so long ago that the idea of 'rotation' was almost unheard of. Man U started it, pretty much, in the 90s, when they rotated four strikers - Yorke, Cole, Sherringham, Solskaer. Now the top teams have at least two top players for every position. Meaning the rest of the teams have fewer players to choose from. Even top internationals like Raheem Stirling can struggle to get regular matches. We're all short-changed by the quality sitting on the bench rather than on the pitch.

Something like this idea would only move that situation even further.
 
From Dan Roan at the BBC

It’s all legacy stuff isn’t it? The history of the clubs. Their origins. The concept of promotion/relegation. The notion of footballing form threatening profits. The view that the game isn’t merely a multi media spectacle without meaning. All legacy stuff. All ‘gammon’ like nostalgia to be swept aside for the ‘new generation’ of stakeholder fan
 
It’s all legacy stuff isn’t it? The history of the clubs. Their origins. The concept of promotion/relegation. The notion of footballing form threatening profits. The view that the game isn’t merely a multi media spectacle without meaning. All legacy stuff. All ‘gammon’ like nostalgia to be swept aside for the ‘new generation’ of stakeholder fan
Legacy fans , legacy working class. As Mandelson once said of the latter but its true of the former 'they've got nowhere else to go'
 
Back
Top Bottom