Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
A quick search proves otherwise.No, I'm not
Yoy also like to post gifs of people getting badly injured
A quick search proves otherwise.No, I'm not
A quick search proves otherwise.
Yoy also like to post gifs of people getting badly injured
Yep, his tweets got plenty of likes and retweetsHis views are probably not too dissimilar from many 60ish working class men.
"Look at me! Look at me!" says someone that no one has heard of.
"That man said a thing!" says the media. "Let's draw attention to it in order to make it EVEN MORE DIFFICULT for those affected to come forward!"
Hmmm. It gets to the front page of the BBC. Idiot talks ignorant shit used not to be front-page news.Or; let it go unchallenged and thus reinforce ignorance.
Hmmm. It gets to the front page of the BBC. Idiot talks ignorant shit used not to be front-page news.
Not if one is bending over backwards to excuse it, perhaps. I don't think there is any ambiguity about his message. Nor, it seems, do quite a lot of other people which at least tells me that I'm not falling over myself in my desire to be outraged.I guess you should do whatever you feel comfortable with. I've only seen the twitter comments which is not enough for me to do the outraged indignant thing. I'd like to hear him speak on newsnight or summat, look into his eyes and hear his tone of voice etc. A 140 characters or less twitter comment doesn't really do the job.
Yeah, I guess I don't even want my son to know that this is an opinion that some people (ok, one that we know about) hold. I don't want it to even make the light of day because I don't want to have to explain it. It's an insult to a mind boggling number of people. And it's not like he's some sort of gifted demagogue whose views are a dangerous influence - as far as I can make out he plays darts.
Do shareA quick search proves otherwise.
Yoy also like to post gifs of people getting badly injured
Nope, don't want another derail all about youDo share
No. He made a grossly offensive comment in public. He made it clear that he regards male victims of abusers as not proper men (I wonder what his excuse for the female ones is? Are they supposed to man up and deck their abuser too? Or do they get a man to do it for them?).He made a ridiculous comment in public
Yeh. cos there's nothing comparable to your hanging nonsense.Nope, don't want another derail all about you
Well, you seem to have made this one pretty much all about you, so it's hardly breaking with precedent.Nope, don't want another derail all about you
Or simply unreported as there's no good reason to give a shit what he says about anything besides darts. I always look askance at what people say about subjects outside their fields of expertise, and see no reason to care more about bristow's views in this matter than his views on the French wars of religion: both are of negligible worth.Fair enough. I just liked it when we HADN'T heard his views. I agree they should be challenged. I suppose. Harrumph.
Or simply unreported as there's no good reason to give a shit what he says about anything besides darts. I always look askance at what people about subjects outside their fields of expertise, and see no reason to care more about bristow's views in this matter than his views on the French wars of religion: both are of negligible worth.
"Yer, but honour would have been satisfied, innit?"Shit advice, too. Besides having been abused they'll end up on an assault or murder charge.
Shit advice, too. Besides having been abused they'll end up on an assault or murder charge.
Most of us are decent people, and that includes those who have been on the receiving end of sexual abuse. Decent people don't usually get to feel good about violently assaulting other people, even when they know that it was unavoidable. So I think a more likely outcome is that someone already dealing with the fallout from being abused is just going to add the guilt/shame/anxiety of having committed an assault on their abuser to the toxic mix of emotions.Maybe. But, on the other hand, they might find it brings some closure. I don't know, becasue I've never been in that situation, but I could well imagine the appeal of such a course of action. But that's quite different from what Bristow is suggesting i.e. that there's something wrong with men who choose not to respond in that way.
Most of us are decent people, and that includes those who have been on the receiving end of sexual abuse. Decent people don't usually get to feel good about violently assaulting other people, even when they know that it was unavoidable. So I think a more likely outcome is that someone already dealing with the fallout from being abused is just going to add the guilt/shame/anxiety of having committed an assault on their abuser to the toxic mix of emotions.
The only likely motive for a victim becoming aggressive and "sorting out" their abuser later would be that they had developed that aggression as a compensation for the effect that being abused had on them. Acting out on compensatory stuff rarely addresses or neutralises the underlying problem, so I think Eric Bristow's advice is wrong on pretty much every count, plus, as you point out, being offensive to those who choose not to (or are too afraid to - that fear runs deep) act it out.
"Before you set out on revenge, dig two graves"Maybe I take a less negative view of violence; I think that it can, in some instances, be a useful tool. Not necessarily a "compensation" but merely a means to an end (in this case of revenge, and the peace that can bring).