Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ecuador would like Julian Assange out of their embassy by the sounds of it.

Well you’re not discussing it. You’ve made a statement which I’ve twice asked you to discuss and elaborate on and you’ve just thrown your toys around. That’s a complete waste of fucking time.
OK, so I'll post this yet again and no doubt it will be a total waste of time. This report from the UN explains that when Assange was visited in May he showed all the signs of being psychologically tortured: OHCHR | UN expert on torture sounds alarm again that Julian Assange’s life may be at risk

I also disagree with the way Assange is treated generally - being falsely accused of rape when there is no evidence for this and when, I think I'm right in saying, neither of the relevent women wanted him charged with rape and he did actually offer to come forward to answer the case in Sweden (I posted about this above) Here is the link I posted: «A murderous system is being created before our very eyes»

And if Assange is extradited to the US and convicted and abused in god knows where simply for journalism then it will set a hideously dangerous precedent- aided by people like you who couldn't give a shit about it.
 
OK, so I'll post this yet again and no doubt it will be a total waste of time. This report from the UN explains that when Assange was visited in May he show all the signs of being psychologically tortured: OHCHR | UN expert on torture sounds alarm again that Julian Assange’s life may be at risk

I also disagree with the way Assange is treated generally - being falsely accused of rape when there is no evidence for this and when, I think I'm right in saying, neither of the relevent women wanted him charged with rape (I posted about this above0.

And if Assange is extradited to the US and convicted and abused in god knows where simply for journalism then it will set a hideously dangerous precedent- aided by people like you who couldn't give a shit about it.

As I said previously, you are wrong, the alleged victims did indeed want him charged.

Why don't you try to seperate the two issues yeah? Nobody is going to seriously disagree with the possibility that Assange has been badly treated while imprisoned. But you're not going to get very far if you keep insisting he was falsely accused of rape. Why are you accusing women of falsifying rape allegations? It isn't really necessary is it? Makes you sound like a crazed incel, especially with that user name.

E2A: By the way, I don't think Assange should be extradited to the US and if he had stood trial in Sweden, a country that has never extradited anyone to the US, he would not have been. Would probably be out of prison by now too.
 
Fuck Julian Assange, he made such a big song and dance about wanting to change the world by making information freely available to the public, then he hoarded information like a grubby little Gollum and deployed some of it to help Donald Trump get elected, with disastrous consequences - it would be a fitting enough end if the pandemic finished him off.
 
OK, so I'll post this yet again and no doubt it will be a total waste of time. This report from the UN explains that when Assange was visited in May he showed all the signs of being psychologically tortured: OHCHR | UN expert on torture sounds alarm again that Julian Assange’s life may be at risk

I also disagree with the way Assange is treated generally - being falsely accused of rape when there is no evidence for this and when, I think I'm right in saying, neither of the relevent women wanted him charged with rape and he did actually offer to come forward to answer the case in Sweden (I posted about this above) Here is the link I posted: «A murderous system is being created before our very eyes»

And if Assange is extradited to the US and convicted and abused in god knows where simply for journalism then it will set a hideously dangerous precedent- aided by people like you who couldn't give a shit about it.
You are very very wrong and need to get that sorted before people are going to engage you seriously on this.
 
As I said previously, you are wrong, the alleged victims did indeed want him charged.

Why don't you try to seperate the two issues yeah? Nobody is going to seriously disagree with the possibility that Assange has been badly treated while imprisoned. But you're not going to get very far if you keep insisting he was falsely accused of rape. Why are you accusing women of falsifying rape allegations? It isn't really necessary is it? Makes you sound like a crazed incel, especially with that user name.
I'm not accusing the two women of anything and saying that I am is a strawman. My understanding is that atleast one of the women did not want Assange charged with rape, did you even read the fucking link I posted FFS?
 
I'm not accusing the two women of anything and saying that I am is a strawman. My understanding is that atleast one of the women did not want Assange charged with rape, did you even read the fucking link I posted FFS?

I'm trying to help you here. Your understanding is wrong. At least one of the alleged victims very definitely did want him charged with rape.

By saying he was falsely accused of rape, you are saying that the allegations were falsified are you not? By the women who allege that he raped them?
 
OK, so I'll post this yet again and no doubt it will be a total waste of time. This report from the UN explains that when Assange was visited in May he showed all the signs of being psychologically tortured: OHCHR | UN expert on torture sounds alarm again that Julian Assange’s life may be at risk

I also disagree with the way Assange is treated generally - being falsely accused of rape when there is no evidence for this and when, I think I'm right in saying, neither of the relevent women wanted him charged with rape and he did actually offer to come forward to answer the case in Sweden (I posted about this above) Here is the link I posted: «A murderous system is being created before our very eyes»

And if Assange is extradited to the US and convicted and abused in god knows where simply for journalism then it will set a hideously dangerous precedent- aided by people like you who couldn't give a shit about it.
i have to say this again, torture - psychological or not - is not the same as interrogation, which was your initial claim. he is not being at this very moment interrogated by agents of the state. it may not be nice for him inside, it maybe downright awful, but that should be put in an argument for prison reform pending the abolition of such institutions if you're so exercised about it.
 
Fuck Julian Assange, he made such a big song and dance about wanting to change the world by making information freely available to the public, then he hoarded information like a grubby little Gollum and deployed some of it to help Donald Trump get elected, with disastrous consequences - it would be a fitting enough end if the pandemic finished him off.

I think it was established recently that Trump approached Assange offering a get out of jail free card in exchange for his help disproving his involvement with Russian hackers . Assange told him to jog on.
 
This is an extract about the second woman from one of the links I posted about, the first woman did not state that she had been raped and did not want a rape charge filed. it's very important you read it:


What did the second woman say when she was questioned?
She said that she had made her apartment available to Assange, who was in Sweden for a conference. A small, one-room apartment. When Assange was in the apartment, she came home earlier than planned, but told him it was no problem and that the two of them could sleep in the same bed. That night, they had consensual sex, with a condom. But she said that during sex, Assange had intentionally broken the condom. If that is true, then it is, of course, a sexual offense – so-called «stealthing». But the woman also said that she only later noticed that the condom was broken. That is a contradiction that should absolutely have been clarified. If I don’t notice it, then I cannot know if the other intentionally broke it. Not a single trace of DNA from Assange or A. A. could be detected in the condom that was submitted as evidence.
 
I'm not accusing the two women of anything and saying that I am is a strawman.
You pretty much are, I'm afraid. You're relying very heavily on Nils Melzer, who is a cheerleader for Assange, and has been fiercly attacked by one of the victims for making stuff up and victim blaming.

You really need to do some reading before you post again on this.
 
Last edited:
Where is your evidence that I'm wrong? Please provide it.
That you haven't bothered to get even the basics of the case correct now - years later - has convinced me that it's not worth bothering with it. So, no. Stop insulting people with this moral/intellectual laziness - then we can have a conversation. Not that i think i could post anything beyond what i've now posted thousands of times. You are circling that cess-pit and calling out it's lovely properties.
 
This is an extract about the second woman from one of the links I posted about, it's very important you read it:


What did the second woman say when she was questioned?
She said that she had made her apartment available to Assange, who was in Sweden for a conference. A small, one-room apartment. When Assange was in the apartment, she came home earlier than planned, but told him it was no problem and that the two of them could sleep in the same bed. That night, they had consensual sex, with a condom. But she said that during sex, Assange had intentionally broken the condom. If that is true, then it is, of course, a sexual offense – so-called «stealthing». But the woman also said that she only later noticed that the condom was broken. That is a contradiction that should absolutely have been clarified. If I don’t notice it, then I cannot know if the other intentionally broke it. Not a single trace of DNA from Assange or A. A. could be detected in the condom that was submitted as evidence.

I mean, it really isn't important I read it.

But assuming this extract informs your view, then you are in fact accusing the women of falsifying the allegation of rape. Aren't you?
 
Obviously not.

You are, because you are saying she could not know the condom had been deliberately removed, but in her testimony she said that she was aware he was no longer wearing a condom and that she asked him to stop repeatedly. So by saying that she could not know, you are accusing her of lying when she said that she was aware he wasn't using a condom and asked him to stop.
 
The same time that he was posting anti-semitic filth on twitter i suppose. Cess-pit dwellers arguing it's a paradise - join us.

Who is Ian Hislop anyway... a lacky of the establishment. As for the rest... have you never associated with anyone with anti-semetic agendas... unknowingly ?
 
Who is Ian Hislop anyway... a lacky of the establishment. As for the rest... have you never associated with anyone with anti-semetic agendas... unknowingly ?
I've never, ever, over an extended period of time, posted anti-semitic filth on twitter. Your hero can't say the same - nor can you, or other arse-lickers, claim that you are unknowingly licking his anti-jew arse. You're doing it because you know what he is and what he believes. Because you are cess-pit dwellers and an attack on one midden is an attack on all middens.
 
I've never, ever, over an extended period of time, posted anti-semitic filth on twitter. Your hero can't say the same - nor can you, or other arse-lickers, claim that you are unknowingly licking his anti-jew arse. You're doing it because you know what he is and what he believes. Because you are cess-pit dwellers and an attack on one midden is an attack on all middens.

How fucking dare you . You ignorant prick. I don`t even use shitter .
 
What did you do today Butchers ? .... supported the state line as always because you are the stereotype of the bourgeois intellectual .
 
Back
Top Bottom