Though there may be hope:
Cricketer guilty of raping sleeping woman
Slightly different case but still. What an absolute horrible cunt btw.
Ecuador would like Julian Assange out of their embassy by the sounds of it.
- Thread starter MightyTibberton
- Start date
Though there may be hope:
Cricketer guilty of raping sleeping woman
Slightly different case but still. What an absolute horrible cunt btw.
Idris2002
canadian girlfriend
https://www.theonion.com/cackling-julian-assange-disintegrates-into-lines-of-cod-1833977866
shit writes itself dude
shit writes itself dude
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
The Guardian: Give priority to Julian Assange rape claim, home secretary urged.
Give priority to Julian Assange rape claim, home secretary urged
Link above confirms that if sweden does seek extradition as well as the usa then it's the home secretary that decides which one takes priority.
Give priority to Julian Assange rape claim, home secretary urged
Link above confirms that if sweden does seek extradition as well as the usa then it's the home secretary that decides which one takes priority.
Last edited:
andysays
Love and solidarity
This seems a far better position to take than the one Corbyn and Abbott were pushing yesterday
Julian Assange 'must face Swedish justice' if country asks, say MPs
ska invita
back on the other side
Doesnt seem far better to me.
Giving priority to Sweden does not mean don't give him up to the US government after. It means go to Sweden first IF they want him
Abbotts position doesn't contradict the Swedish bit of that "letter of 70", Abbott also said he should face Swedish system if swedes request it, but shouldnt be given up to the US. To be precise Abbott said "“If the Swedish government wants to come forward with those charges I believe that Assange should face the criminal justice system.” <how is that different from this far better letter?
Its "far better" if you want him given over to the US government. It doesnt take a position on that crucial issue.
Giving priority to Sweden does not mean don't give him up to the US government after. It means go to Sweden first IF they want him
Abbotts position doesn't contradict the Swedish bit of that "letter of 70", Abbott also said he should face Swedish system if swedes request it, but shouldnt be given up to the US. To be precise Abbott said "“If the Swedish government wants to come forward with those charges I believe that Assange should face the criminal justice system.” <how is that different from this far better letter?
Its "far better" if you want him given over to the US government. It doesnt take a position on that crucial issue.
Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Well that's me convinced. An obviously unbiased article that reads like it was written by a 5 year old.
ska invita
back on the other side
different source,Well that's me convinced. An obviously unbiased article that reads like it was written by a 5 year old.
Assange, Back in News, Never Left U.S. Radar
of course the fbi are after.him..
tim
EXPLODED TIM! (Help me!!!)
Fortunately, we'll still be able to smell him.
petee
no gods, no malarkey
'scuse, but you have no idea what sort of site you're dealing with there.
Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
No shit Sherlock. But can you see the difference between the two articles?
Idris2002
canadian girlfriend
Anyone seen this? It's one of those things that look like a pile of shite, but you want it to be true:
Assange's arrest was designed to make sure he didn't press a mysterious panic button he said would bring dire consequences for Ecuador
"We've ended the asylum of this spoiled brat". . . "Assange doesn't like cutlery, and eats hot jam pudding with his bare hands". . .
Assange's arrest was designed to make sure he didn't press a mysterious panic button he said would bring dire consequences for Ecuador
"We've ended the asylum of this spoiled brat". . . "Assange doesn't like cutlery, and eats hot jam pudding with his bare hands". . .
Idris2002
canadian girlfriend
The one thing that should concern us, I think, is Washington think it can have jurisdiction over someone who isn't a US citizen, and isn't resident in that country.
Now don't get me wrong, I do think JA should be extradited to Sweden, but the Washington thing does give me, as I said, cause for concern. . .
Now don't get me wrong, I do think JA should be extradited to Sweden, but the Washington thing does give me, as I said, cause for concern. . .
Brainaddict
slight system overdrive
Just talking to someone who is convinced of Assange's line that the whole Swedish prosecution was a conspiracy to get him to the US. Sweden refused to deny they had an extradition request from the US, thus proving they did have a request etc etc. I remember reading some refutation of all this some years back but it is ungoogleable now due to recent news. Does anyone know a good link about it?
emanymton
A cat politely sat on the flaming gardener.
Again if I remember correctly she only agreed to sex if a condom was used, but woke up to find him assaulting her without one. So she had explicitly refused consent and he knew it.
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
Why would they need to extradite him to sweden first? Instead of just sending him direct from the uk to the usa?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Once you're talking to conspiracists you'll see nothing is simple and everything is complicated. Ockham's razor may as well never have been invented.
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Ideally ja would go Sweden - Singapore - somaliland - Kiribati - USA with a stopover for a bonus interrogation at Diego Garcia. But even Trump balked at the environmental footprint that would leave.Yeah i know
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Until he *allegedly* started raping / sexually assaulting people it was a cushy little number
Balbi
Hey, Dean Yager!
If I recall he wanted Sweden to guarantee he wouldn't be extradited to the U.S for any reason, and Sweden went
a) we haven't received a request for your extradition
b) we're not going to give you that guarantee because it would mean amending our extradition agreements in Parliament for you specifically and who the fuck do you think you are
a) we haven't received a request for your extradition
b) we're not going to give you that guarantee because it would mean amending our extradition agreements in Parliament for you specifically and who the fuck do you think you are
sihhi
Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered
John Pilger whose views don't coincide with mine has written about it:
THE ASSANGE ARREST IS A WARNING FROM HISTORY
It doesn't matter what you think of Assange, or what anyone else but the Americans in power think - He's upset some big players and they'll be after him in whatever ways they can.
Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
But in other articles they're gathering evidence or investigating. In the one you choose of course, they're trying to FRAME him.Yep, but I've since checked and it's on proper sites as well
Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Well there's a surprise. The yanks want to prosecute him. They're going to be looking for evidence.
Similar threads
