JimW
支那暗杀团
Of course but look how it was handled afterwards. Similar ball-park and that this is a drone would suggest deliberately picking something significant but not too critical.The midair collision was an accident, not an intentional act.
Of course but look how it was handled afterwards. Similar ball-park and that this is a drone would suggest deliberately picking something significant but not too critical.The midair collision was an accident, not an intentional act.
And my point is that doesn't look quite as stark an escalation when put in the context of the regular incidents in the South China Sea, both naval and in the air. it is noteworthy but not something completely out of left field.The point is that the detention etc, flowed from an accident. The Chinese weighed the situation, and responded as they did.
If the mission had gone as planned, ie shadowing with no accidental collision, there would have been no detention, etc. It was opportunistic.
Lowering a boat and then fishing an American drone sub out of the water, and sailing away with it, is an intentional act.
The Hainan Incident was a mid-air collision; i.e. an accident, not an intentional act.
Military 'stalking' is a common practice amongst the worlds military powers.
The seizure of US military property by a foreign military in the Pacific hasn't happened for a long time. I could very well be wrong, but the last such incident I can recall in the Pacific, was the Pueblo Incident.
It's true that the US and China have been in dispute in the South China Sea for a long time; but this seizure of military property by China, constitutes an escalation of the dispute.
The fact that this unusual escalation comes a week or so after the President-elect has called the One China policy into question might just be a coincidence: anything's possible.
No I admit I haven't got around to reading the article yet (I'm at work atm but I will do when I get the chance). But the idea that the utter shamelessness of politicians regarding their hypocrisies is something new is crazy. Not only are their countless examples both modern and historical and a to the contrary but there's shed loads of art illustrating this trope.That's all true. You haven't read the article, have you. I didn't summarise it well. Trump doesn't even try.
ETA. Trump is not just more of the usual. He is a step change that the press (such as remain) can't begin to engage with.
Is that Belgrade, Okinawa, perhaps? Because we're discussing the Pacific.
And my point is that doesn't look quite as stark an escalation when put in the context of the regular incidents in the South China Sea, both naval and in the air. it is noteworthy but not something completely out of left field.
Oh please. It's not like that. At. All.No I admit I haven't got around to reading the article yet (I'm at work atm but I will do when I get the chance). But the idea that the utter shamelessness of politicians regarding their hypocrisies is something new is crazy. Not only are their countless examples both modern and historical and a to the contrary but there's shed loads of art illustrating this trope.
Just two more examples that spring to mind
- the LibDems utter selling out of their pledge on tuition fees for another example, absolute no shame about this (and plenty of liberal fucks willing to absolve them for it)
- the biography of Tom Wintringham I'm currently reading has a chapter hightlighting the total turnaround of much the upper class from either fawning over or accepting Hitler to becoming dedicated anti-fascists
Unusual in as much you paid attention to it for once, at leastWe'll have to agree to disagree as to whether an intentional seizure of US military hardware by China qualifies as an 'unusual incident'.
Trump added:
So nothing to see here, just the president-elect of the United States publicly picking a fight on Twitter with a union - got to wonder how long it's going to be before this kind of shit is accepted as the new normal.
His loveliness just keeps on shining through! WTF is the PEOTUS doing dicking about on twitter.
Next there'll be a UN forum where they can all log in and have squabbles like we do on here, with any luck it'll save millions of lives and billions in property over the years to come.
or wales will declare war on slovenia
Well lots of jobs disappeared as agriculture mechanised and mammoth hunting really isn't what it once was. The labour market has always been changing.
The pentagon said it was "part of an unclassified program to map underwater channels." Possibly for submarines?It was an oceanic survey drone. Anyone know what it was actually doing? Was it just measuring temperature, salinity, that sort of thing, or was it spying?
They are knowingly engaging in cat-and-mouse provocation and counter with stuff like this in the South China Sea whatever the ostensible purpose was though.The pentagon said it was "part of an unclassified program to map underwater channels." Possibly for submarines?
The unclassified program doesn't sound nefarious. It's hard to interpret the seizure as anything but an act of aggression, one of those things done to judge the strength of response.The pentagon said it was "part of an unclassified program to map underwater channels." Possibly for submarines?
Because doing it in international waters is provocative.They are knowingly engaging in cat-and-mouse provocation and counter with stuff like this in the South China Sea whatever the ostensible purpose was though.
Trump risks damaging intelligence agencies, warns former CIA chief
As opposed to what they are actually doing, liberals should be cheering on any estrangement between Trump and the 'intelligence community'. Trump is inheriting the sort of system of surveillance that Ceausescu and Pinochet could only dream of, the then hypothetical prospect of someone like Trump taking power is what privacy advocates used to (unsuccessfully) use to scare Obama Democrats into reconsidering setting up the architecture used for mass surveillance.
Have you seen the Chinese claim? Runs right up to the coast of the Philippines. And from their point of view all US naval activity in the area is aimed at them. China's claims are pretty ridiculous but the US presence,carrier groups through the Taiwan Strait etc, is also clearly intended to provoke and a lot further from the coast of the US than this is from China. Big power bullshit all round.Because doing it in international waters is provocative.
Fair dos. China claims it so the US mustn't provoke them.Have you seen the Chinese claim? Runs right up to the coast of the Philippines. And from their point of view all US naval activity in the area is aimed at them. China's claims are pretty ridiculous but the US presence,carrier groups through the Taiwan Strait etc, is also clearly intended to provoke and a lot further from the coast of the US than this is from China. Big power bullshit all round.
No you silly sod, all I'm saying is the US knows it will be seen as provoking and a response like the Chinese took will have been calculated. They're at this all year round.Fair dos. China claims it so the US mustn't provoke them.
Cuban missile crisisBecause doing it in international waters is provocative.
As opposed to the Monroe doctrineFair dos. China claims it so the US mustn't provoke them.
Sigh. Of course. But the thing is they (the Americans) have done this provocative thing now and they (the Chinese) have taken it to the next level. It means something, which is that the Chinese won't be messed with, and as far as I can see the Americans don't have much to retaliate with unless they ramp it up to an insanely dangerous level, which they aren't going to do. The Chinese know that, and they have chosen now to do it to show Trump (Obama is a dead duck) who's in charge - or to challenge him to a fight he'll fail at.No you silly sod, all I'm saying is the US knows it will be seen as provoking and a response like the Chinese took will have been calculated. They're at this all year round.
As opposed to the Monroe doctrine