You may have a point there.Well, yes and no, Pilch.
Do you think that during a general election run-up, a British party leader would survive a tape recording of him telling people that he grabbed women's pussies, being made public?
I honestly don't.
Not post-Savile, because that is a major hot button issue. But let's not forget the decades of systematic sexual abuse at the top echelons. People knew about it and it didn't stop the perpetrators being in the elite in all facets of society.Well, yes and no, Pilch.
Do you think that during a general election run-up, a British party leader would survive a tape recording of him telling people that he grabbed women's pussies, being made public?
I honestly don't.
He wasn't caught on tape admitting it. irrc it came from one unsubstantiated source, and much we all want it to be true, it may not be.That whole 'facefucking a dead pig' thing died down much quicker than I'd expected tbf.
I think a half way competent republican candidate would be a major threat to Clinton - shes not well liked, shes been around a long time and has accumulated a lot of baggage. Shes the perfect opponent for someone like trump.
That was fuck-all by comparison to admitting to grabbing women by the pussy. Straightforward, and very serious, sexual assault.That whole 'facefucking a dead pig' thing died down much quicker than I'd expected tbf.
There's a difference between it being hidden, and the whole fucking world hearing you admit to doing it.Not post-Savile, because that is a major hot button issue. But let's not forget the decades of systematic sexual abuse at the top echelons. People knew about it and it didn't stop the perpetrators being in the elite in all facets of society.
The point is that it wasn't hidden. It just wasn't publicised. And yes, there is a difference in that, but it's not one I'm particularly inclined to crow about.There's a difference between it being hidden, and the whole fucking world hearing you admit to doing it.
The pigfukcer never actually came right and denied it. And he never denied that there was a photo of the scene knocking around.He wasn't caught on tape admitting it. irrc it came from one unsubstantiated source, and much we all want it to be true, it may not be.
It was hidden from the public. Very well hidden for a long time. The point is that a British politician would not have then, and would not now, survive admissions of extremely serious sexual assaults against women, much less be seriously considered as a potential PM.The point is that it wasn't hidden. It just wasn't publicised. And yes, there is a difference in that, but it's not one I'm particularly inclined to crow about.
But that sniffing thing. Stop fucking doing that.
You mean Mondale, right? IIRC some in the Hilary camp were predicting a clean sweep equal to Nixon in '72. But that was back in the summer, when it still looked vaguely like a normal campaign.
IIRC some in the Hilary camp were predicting a clean sweep equal to Nixon in '72. But that was back in the summer, when it still looked vaguely like a normal campaign.
There's still women I know that when you refer to groping from the 70s will say "oh well it was a different time and my teacher/priest/accountant used to grab me regularly but you just expected it"It was hidden from the public. Very well hidden for a long time. The point is that a British politician would not have then, and would not now, survive admissions of extremely serious sexual assaults against women, much less be seriously considered as a potential PM.
That's not crowing. Thank fuck.
Incredible that the world class US medical system can't cure him of a trifling cold eh?I've not seen either of the debates but if someone goes up on stage and spends their whole time sniffing there is usually a simple explanation.
Yeah I think this could actually make him more popular among some people tbh
Isn't he on 43% or something? 43% of the american electorate are bullies?Near as I can tell the people who support him are bullies themselves.
Maybe 43% are insecure frightened and angry, as those who rally round bullies often seem to be?Isn't he on 43% or something? 43% of the american electorate are bullies?
Isn't he on 43% or something? 43% of the american electorate are bullies?
...surprising the insecure and angry aren't rallying round the candidate from the Goldman Sachs party....them being such nice people and all....
There was at least a pretence towards covering it up, though...Not post-Savile, because that is a major hot button issue. But let's not forget the decades of systematic sexual abuse at the top echelons. People knew about it and it didn't stop the perpetrators being in the elite in all facets of society.
You think that the Trump camp wouldn't like to have covered this up, and that they don't think it hurts their chances?There was at least a pretence towards covering it up, though...
I've not seen either of the debates but if someone goes up on stage and spends their whole time sniffing there is usually a simple explanation.
This didn't happen in the 70s.There's still women I know that when you refer to groping from the 70s will say "oh well it was a different time and my teacher/priest/accountant used to grab me regularly but you just expected it"
This didn't happen in the 70s.
Trump was grabbing pussies 10 years ago.