Yeh I have been having a similar discussion lately elsewhere, people online discussing politics massively overestimate how much other people know about politics. I'd bet if I walked out the door and found the first 100 people barely half could name the leader of the Lib Dems, the ones that didn't wisely avoid me asking stupid questions anyway.
I quite happily went cold turkey with all news for 5 years, it was quite relaxing but before 24 hour news was a thing and so much pushing on various platforms. What difference did it make to me? It was quieter and I spent more time doing other things. Made no odds to the election locally or nationwide as I lost every single vote until the last one which was simply anti-tory again and still a tory got in locally. Did reduce stress levels of seeing who was being blown up today, where some nutter had shoot up a school, etc etc etc.
I was well aware just about everything you could think of that was awful was probably happening somewhere every minute if not more often. Removing yourself from that can be quite appealing, especially if you don't actually have much of a base of knowledge on it anyway or much interest. With work and sleep mostly taking up 2/3 of at least 5 days a week, other stuff to do, hobbies, families, etc etc. I can see why people don't spend a lot of their time outside of designated hours reading about political stuff, let alone all the fact checking and thinking thats then involved on top cos its often from a biased source, which also requires knowing that and on and on. There's so many other things to do that seem way more appealing.