Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump - MAGAtwat news and discussion

I just had a quick idle google of this Spoonamore fellow, trying to gauge his credibility, still don't know much about him but found this:
1734479538394.png
So he's a dyed-in-the-wool Republican who thinks that the Republicans hacked the 2002 and 2004 elections. Not sure why they didn't bother with the 2008 ones, maybe they thought it'd be overkill.
 
I just had a quick idle google of this Spoonamore fellow, trying to gauge his credibility, still don't know much about him but found this:
View attachment 455416
So he's a dyed-in-the-wool Republican who thinks that the Republicans hacked the 2002 and 2004 elections. Not sure why they didn't bother with the 2008 ones, maybe they thought it'd be overkill.
Too hopeless to link as I'm on my phone, but I've just read an Al Jazera 'fact check' on the claim Trump stole the election. Takeawy: No.
 
79 million people, 49.9% of voters. Just “incredibly stupid” and “as vile as he is”. There we go, analysis done. Beer, anyone?
It's certainly a lot more precise, accurate and succinct than your pretentious, mind-numbing, theoretical gibberish about voter motivations.

But well done for shoehorning the word "cleavage" into one of your analyses, I can see where your interests truly lie.👍
 
Last edited:
People can disagree with other people on many issues, without thinking their opposition are stupid. We are talking a whole new level here with the orange lunatic and his supporters though. Anyone who thinks they aren't all as thick as pig shit, must be on the wind up.
Red wine for me please.

If you think that the vast majority of his supporters are not extremely stupid, then I have a bridge to sell you. They are also vile. Anyone who listens to his claptrap, and supports it, cannot be called decent people.

Are you intelligent and decent people?

You're dismissing millions of people who didn't vote the way you wanted.

It's the epitome of elitism and snobbery to do such a thing. Can you understand why someone might have cast their vote for the Republicans?
 
For anyone sneering at the possibility of dodgy dealings in the election, here is the letter from the computer expert, Stephen Spoonamore, to Harris, urging her to investigate. It's the full letter, around 15 minutes long, and he goes into great detail about what has happened. This guy knows his stuff, and for anyone thinking he is partisan, he is a dyed-in-the-wool Republican.


You say "this guy knows his stuff". What makes you believe this? What do you actually know about him or his history? Are you capable of doing the most basic of checking of your sources? Or are you often taken in by seemingly authoritative stuff that the internet throws in your direction, like all those Trump voters?
 
Back
Top Bottom