Yuwipi Woman
Whack-A-Mole Queen
A government by the billionaire, for the billionaire.
Donald Trump - MAGAtwat news and discussion
- Thread starter tim
- Start date
A government by the billionaire, for the billionaire.
spring-peeper
Well-Known Member
wtf!!!
nationalpost.com
The incoming vice-president of the United States, JD Vance, has come to the defence of a Conservative MP who says Canadian Christians are being persecuted and need protection from Ottawa.e content
Durham MP (and former National Post columnist) Jamil Jivani, is promoting a petition that he intends to present in Ottawa in February 2025. In a video posted to the X social media platform, Jivani says he is “sounding the alarm. We must protect Christians in Canada from governments and corporations abusing their power in our country, and from anti-Christian bigotry.”
What is he about???
“Canada has seen a number of church burnings in recent years thanks to anti-Christian bigotry. All over the world, Christians are the most persecuted religious group. Jamil is speaking the truth. Shame on journalists who refuse to see what’s obvious.”
Oh - was not aware of that one.
JD Vance backs Conservative MP Jamil Jivani’s campaign for protection of Canadian Christians
MP Jamil Jivani is promoting a petition calling for all levels of government to take action to protect Christians in Canada.
The incoming vice-president of the United States, JD Vance, has come to the defence of a Conservative MP who says Canadian Christians are being persecuted and need protection from Ottawa.e content
Durham MP (and former National Post columnist) Jamil Jivani, is promoting a petition that he intends to present in Ottawa in February 2025. In a video posted to the X social media platform, Jivani says he is “sounding the alarm. We must protect Christians in Canada from governments and corporations abusing their power in our country, and from anti-Christian bigotry.”
What is he about???
“Canada has seen a number of church burnings in recent years thanks to anti-Christian bigotry. All over the world, Christians are the most persecuted religious group. Jamil is speaking the truth. Shame on journalists who refuse to see what’s obvious.”
Oh - was not aware of that one.
Yossarian
Get thee behind me, Santa
Seems disingenuous to label the fires simply the result of "anti-Christian bigotry" when most of them were on Indigenous land soon after the discovery of unmarked graves at residential school sites
ici.radio-canada.ca
At least 33 Canadian churches have burned to the ground since May 2021. Only 2 were accidents | RCI
CBC investigation finds steep rise in church fires since reports of potential graves at residential schools
ici.radio-canada.ca
breadandcircuse
"The time is always right to do what is right"
The orange bastard is coming after TMT. So they are hardly the clickbait some are alleging, and they are getting more viewers than Fox. Anyway, a discussion between Ben and Harry, both lawyers, about the crook's latest filing in NY, naming them, to try and get his felonies quashed. I believe Harry has resigned from the LA Times due to their support of the monster.
Again, if you don't like TMT, just don't watch. It's 10 mins long, with no ads, so don't moan to me that it's spam.
Again, if you don't like TMT, just don't watch. It's 10 mins long, with no ads, so don't moan to me that it's spam.
farmerbarleymow
I'm Petee's spirit animal
Can you post a transcript of the video?
maomao
普費斯
Why don't you have YouTube Premium? You're just being difficult now!
breadandcircuse
"The time is always right to do what is right"
I've had a look, but can't see one. I'm not very techy though, so may be missing something. They do have a website with news articles on there, so it may be that this story will pop up soon.
Sorry, found this.
Last edited:
hitmouse
music obfuscation technology
You're right, I definitely can't see how anyone could possibly think this looked like clickbait:
Fwiw, there are plenty of sites producing low-quality written output with deliberately manipulative headlines as well, I reckon that posting articles from those sources would probably get you a fairly similar reaction on here.
IMAGINE if someone posted like THE TITLES OF THESE VIDEOS. LOL... YOU THINK IT WOULD GO WELL?!
VivaE
Well-Known Member
All good people. Very good people. The best people. Beautiful people. Just as he promised.
Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
Print articles also take way less time to get through than these awful vids
Bahnhof Strasse
Met up with Hannah Courtoy a week next Tuesday
Is it any good? We get people round every six months or so to clean our oven, but if I could save some money with a decent product I’m all ears.
redsquirrel
This Machine Kills Progressives
I think Astonish works well and is easy to use.
My mum got some stuff from Lakeland that did the job but it was super toxic and right faff to use
hitmouse
music obfuscation technology
OK, so the actual factual content here is that Trump filed a motion to have his conviction overturned, and mentioned this lot's coverage of that as a passing aspect of the motion? I'm not sure I understand why I should care about this story. Fwiw, as much as I hate to give the dickhead any credit, I do reckon he may well have a point in describing this as being false and defamatory, and it may well be the sort of stuff that's not wise to put out when there's an upcoming trial that could be prejudiced:I've had a look, but can't see one. I'm not very techy though, so may be missing something. They do have a website with news articles on there, so it may be that this story will pop up soon.
Sorry, found this.
In so far as I have any opinions about all this, which is not very much really, I think I'm a bit annoyed at these people claiming that Trump is ATTACKING them when I think there's other people who are going to be attacked much more directly and suffer much worse under his presidency.
Agreed, much easier to skimread, see if there's any factual content to take note of and/or links to more reliable sources.
hitmouse
music obfuscation technology
I generally don't think it's wise to make firm predictions, because the world is a complicated and unpredictable place, but I do feel fairly confident in saying that I don't think Trump is going to hang billionaires by the neck until they sign their wealth over to him. If he does do that, feel free to quote this post and laugh at me.
pesh
Well-Known Member
Can’t confirm either way I’m afraid, we just buy new ovens when they get dirty.
LakieLady
Well-Known Member
I haven't got it either, but it didn't start with an ad for me.
Yossarian
Get thee behind me, Santa
Anybody who thinks Joe Biden won the 2020 election or thinks the Capitol riot was anything other than a peaceful love-fest isn't getting a job in the Trump administration
The applicants report that they have been asked about how to overhaul the Pentagon, or what technologies could make the intelligence agencies more effective, or how they feel about the use of the military to enforce immigration policy. But before they leave, some of them have been asked a final set of questions that seemed designed to assess their loyalty to President-elect Donald J. Trump.
The questions went further than just affirming allegiance to the incoming administration. The interviewers asked which candidate the applicants had supported in the three most recent elections, what they thought about the events of Jan. 6, 2021, and whether they believed the 2020 election was stolen. The sense they got was that there was only one right answer to each question.
This account is based on interviews with nine people who either interviewed for jobs in the administration or were directly involved in the process. Among those were applicants who said they gave what they intuited to be the wrong answer — either decrying the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6 or saying that President Biden won in 2020. Their answers were met with silence and the taking of notes. They didn’t get the jobs.
The applicants report that they have been asked about how to overhaul the Pentagon, or what technologies could make the intelligence agencies more effective, or how they feel about the use of the military to enforce immigration policy. But before they leave, some of them have been asked a final set of questions that seemed designed to assess their loyalty to President-elect Donald J. Trump.
The questions went further than just affirming allegiance to the incoming administration. The interviewers asked which candidate the applicants had supported in the three most recent elections, what they thought about the events of Jan. 6, 2021, and whether they believed the 2020 election was stolen. The sense they got was that there was only one right answer to each question.
This account is based on interviews with nine people who either interviewed for jobs in the administration or were directly involved in the process. Among those were applicants who said they gave what they intuited to be the wrong answer — either decrying the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6 or saying that President Biden won in 2020. Their answers were met with silence and the taking of notes. They didn’t get the jobs.
breadandcircuse
"The time is always right to do what is right"
Project 2025 in action.
Where is Sebastian Gorka on the Maga nutter scale? Because on Newsnight on Friday he excelled himself.
krtek a houby
Kick me again Jesus
Donald Trump promises to pardon January 6 rioters on ‘day one’
President-elect says he will ‘act quickly’, claiming convicted Capitol rioters had been put through a ‘very nasty system’
Tldr?
The insurectionists will be pardoned on Day 1, although there may be exceptions.
The system is corrupt and their lives were ruined - they went through hell. The investigators of the assault on the Capitol deserve to go to jail.
krtek a houby
Kick me again Jesus
Tldr?
Trump wants the 14th amendment (1868 enshrined in the constitution) done away with.
How?
"Executive action".
Yossarian
Get thee behind me, Santa
The 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868, states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” A constitutional amendment approved by Congress requires ratification by three-fourths of the states.
It sounds like Republicans are aiming to get a law through Congress removing birthright citizenship based on an interpretation of the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" line instead of trying to change the constitution, might be a little dubious but I'm sure the Supreme Court will go along with it
Last edited:
Flavour
hang the bankers
breadandcircuse nobody wants to watch your shit videos so stop wasting your own time by posting them
Yossarian
Get thee behind me, Santa
andysays
Love and solidarity
What does the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" clause mean?
I'm wondering what the status might be of someone who was born in the US but whose parents were there illegally.
emanymton
A cat politely sat on the flaming gardener.
I assumed it meat subject to US law, which would be pretty much everyone in the US. The only possible exception I can think if is someone on a diplomatic visa.
But if they want to use that as a get out clause to claim these people won't under the jurisdiction of the US, then they have to no to arrest and deport them surely? If they have ever engaged with the US legal system then either that was illegal or it shows jurisdiction?
Similar threads
