Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump - MAGAtwat news and discussion

Where is Sebastian Gorka on the Maga nutter scale? Because on Newsnight on Friday he excelled himself.
I mean, from his wiki page:
In a 2007 video, Gorka declared his support for the Magyar Gárda (Hungarian Guard), a paramilitary group described by various sources as neo-fascist and anti-Semitic.[123] Gorka said that "If we look at the Swiss or Israeli example, when it is about a country, that is small and doesn't have a massive military, then a system can be based on a territorial defense ... In America, the state supports them, giving old arms ... After the disturbances of Hungary, last year, a need has risen" to supplement the official military "because the country's military is sick, and totally reflects the state of Hungarian society ... This country cannot defend itself." He also added, that "We support the establishment of the Hungarian Guard despite the personalities involved."[123][124] The Guard was formally banned in Hungary in 2009, two years after Gorka left the country, and this decision was upheld by the European Court of Human Rights, due to its racist activities.
So that's not great. More here:
 
I assumed it meat subject to US law, which would be pretty much everyone in the US. The only possible exception I can think if is someone on a diplomatic visa.

But if they want to use that as a get out clause to claim these people won't under the jurisdiction of the US, then they have to no to arrest and deport them surely? If they have ever engaged with the US legal system then either that was illegal or it shows jurisdiction?

Yeah, it certainly seems ambiguous, if not completely contradictory.
 
What does the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" clause mean?

I'm wondering what the status might be of someone who was born in the US but whose parents were there illegally.
...it could mean territories that aren't states but where citizenship is still conferred (like Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands etc.)...
 
Whilst I feel terrible for the people who did not vote for this getting fucked over, I am so going to enjoy watching the wailing and gnashing of teeth of the buffoons who voted to pull the ladder up behind them getting kicked off it by the very people they voted in. Eventually they are going to realise, as George Carlin put it "It's one big club, and you ain't in it!" but by that point, it'll be too late.
 
Anyway, for those who aren't total fuckwits who don't have the wit to scroll past something they don't like, it seems the orange bastard is intent on his Project 2025 aims, of getting rid of elections as we know them. I do think Farron is still being too optimistic that he can't do it. That's the point of a dictatorship, they don't pay attention to the rules. For those who like text, Farron does read from that, so no moaning.

 
Anyway, for those who aren't total fuckwits who don't have the wit to scroll past something they don't like, it seems the orange bastard is intent on his Project 2025 aims, of getting rid of elections as we know them. I do think Farron is still being too optimistic that he can't do it. That's the point of a dictatorship, they don't pay attention to the rules. For those who like text, Farron does read from that, so no moaning.
It’s hard to scroll past what is essentially a worthless tabloid headline tbf - put it in spoilers if you must post it
Or I’ll start responding with Sunday Sport headlines.
 
Maybe each new thread should have two versions - a tabloid version for thickos n lazies, and a proper one for rigorous analysis.
Would probably end up hating both.
Could you be any more condescending?

I posted a piece from a commentator about something I found interesting. I thought it was a good illustration of what is going on, and food for a discussion. Having been berated previously for not linking what the vid is about, I have given a description. Now you're chuntering about spoilers and tabloids. What the fuck is wrong with you?
 
I haven’t read every single edition of the National Enquirer but I still know it’s a worthless source
So you're equating every single commentator out there with that? There are many different commentators, they are not one monolithic being.

This pile on is coming off as pathetic, and bordering on bullying. Some people need to get a fudging life. I scroll past vids I don't want to watch on another site, but I wouldn't dream of attacking the posters.
 
Whilst I feel terrible for the people who did not vote for this getting fucked over, I am so going to enjoy watching the wailing and gnashing of teeth of the buffoons who voted to pull the ladder up behind them getting kicked off it by the very people they voted in. Eventually they are going to realise, as George Carlin put it "It's one big club, and you ain't in it!" but by that point, it'll be too late.
And how will you distinguish between them?
 
Back
Top Bottom