Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

countryside riot in london!

just one more time ;)




Fat Toff: OOhh gowan gis a kiss

Plod: Nah love, yer pissed and yer smudged your lipstick



1240502.jpg
 
Someone do me a favour - who the fuck is General Llud? It's obviously a name change and maybe I should be able to pick it up through the posting style, but I'm stumped.........
 
Red Jezza said:
Furthermore, rural w/c types are entombed in a culture that tends to go long on deference and 'respecting one's betters'.
Eh?

(I have read the thread btw, just thought that needed questionning even though it was way back on page 6.)
 
totaladdict said:
Eh?

(I have read the thread btw, just thought that needed questionning even though it was way back on page 6.)
Sack of spuds and all that? It is, of course, (stagist, anachronistic) bollocks.
 
totaladdict said:
Eh?

(I have read the thread btw, just thought that needed questionning even though it was way back on page 6.)
there are very strong rural traditions of tradition, deference, 'everyone knowing their place' and insularity. these traditions die hard.
You want proof? hang out in deepest rural Gloucestershire or hunting territory.
 
Red Jezza said:
there are very strong rural traditions of tradition, deference, 'everyone knowing their place' and insularity. these traditions die hard.
You want proof? hang out in deepest rural Gloucestershire or hunting territory.
I do - i don't accept that they exist other than as an idealised version of past social relations. Most rural w/c relationships nowadays are based on the brute force of wage labour - there are no deferent peasnts, there are very few people dependent upon the local landowner - what there is, is nornal wage labour and nornal class war and hatred. This is not serf territory.
 
Red Jezza said:
there are very strong rural traditions of tradition, deference, 'everyone knowing their place' and insularity. these traditions die hard.
You want proof? hang out in deepest rural Gloucestershire or hunting territory.
I do live in countryside, Jezza.

An you're talking bollocks, bor.
 
Buzz sw9 said:
I'd take a very different view and say it is "fucking idiotic" to waste so much time on an issue that will do NO GOOD to the working people of this country, if they are not killed by someone on a horse with dogs they will be shot, poisoned, trapped etc. Why are you getting so excited about it? It is an animal that is going to be killed by someone in some manor.


So only things that are for the benefit of working people should be discussed in Parliament then - all animal welfare laws of the last however many hundred years were a waste of time, were they?

We shouldn't bother ourselves with people who abuse and torture animals - after all, they're going to die anyway aren't they?

Perhaps we should disband the RSPCA - what a waste of time that is!
 
butchersapron said:
I do - i don't accept that they exist other than as an idealised version of past social relations. Most rural w/c relationships nowadays are based on the brute force of wage labour - there are no deferent peasnts, there are very few people dependent upon the local landowner - what there is, is nornal wage labour and nornal class war and hatred. This is not serf territory.
I'm not saying it's all tugged forelocks round your way, or that rural communities are mired in the 50s, on the top of a choccy box tin. I also agree that this tradition has grown less in my life (mainly due, I'd surmise to changing social & economic patterns), and less influential - but I'd maintain you can still see it. It will die out, but god knows when. And it is certainly part of rural social history. I'd also say the 'tradition' element (cf. 'we do things this way cos we always have - it's our way') and the insularity will completely disappear last, long after that deference; like most psycho-social relationships, it is complex and cannot be quantified or broken down into constituent parts.
but it's something I've still noticed strong signs of, whenever I spend long periods in rural areas - revealing slips here and there, a distrust of the new/urban, a slowness to challenge received wisdoms.
finally - I've noticed this a lot in 'horsey' areas. with a lot of hunting or stables
 
General Ludd said:
You may have thought they wore red coats cause they were posh fox hunting tossers but secretly they've been plotting commie revolution. :D

(I'd bet there are proportionally more working class people on this march, and more working class people who go fox hunting, than were at any of the anti-war marches though)

Sorry but thats Bollocks.

I remember reading that there were 10,000 millionaires on the last cunt ryside alliance march.
I'll be surprised if there were more than 10 on the antiwar one.
 
totaladdict said:
I do live in countryside, Jezza.

An you're talking bollocks, bor.
I refer you to my answer to butchersapron, as his post was what you would have said, given sufficient time and thought.
 
But your personal notices really don't add up to to a hill of beans when mounted aginst the massive changes of work structure and patterns that have occoured down here over the last 25 years mate. Your's reads like something out of a post-WW1 middle class novel rather than the reality.
 
butchersapron said:
But your personal notices really don't add up to to a hill of beans when mounted aginst the massive changes of work structure and patterns that have occoured down here over the last 25 years mate. Your's reads like something out of a post-WW1 middle class novel rather than the reality.
again - impossible to quantify. yes, there have been huge changes (the great farming disaster, for one), and yes they add up, collectively, to a far greater impact than my oral history. impossible to disagree with that.
but I am talking about things which I have noticed over my past 38 years. again - I repeat, I've noticed these mainly in horse country. equally, I may be overstating, as this is my personal perspective. If I've misinterpreted or misread, my hands are up. I've certainly not noticed militancy etc like I found,say, Armthorpe '84. If there is greater W/C solidarity - excellent.
 
Ah, but now you're tying the existence of wage labour up with an automatic solidarity...but yes, i do think you'e overstating - and that, to a great extent you miss the core dynamics behind 'country life' today - but you're still a good 'un :D
 
butchersapron said:
Ah, but now you're tying the existence of wage labour up with an automatic solidarity...but yes, i do think you'e overstating - and that, to a great extent you miss the core dynamics behind 'country life' today - but you're still a good 'un :D
fair enough! :)
 
Buzz sw9 said:
Calm down dear! It’s only a bulletin board (shouldn’t that be commercial) I didn’t say any of the things you mention above, it is about proportionality.

Let me ask you three direct questions please:
Do you think that it is right that so much parliamentary time has been spent over the last 7 years on this issue when they could have pushed it through the first time if they had wanted to?

Do you eat meat or wear leather?

Have you read all my posts on this thread?

Yes, yes and no.

Look, I'm not prepared to re-hash all the arguments I've just had with Icepick on another thread.

Am I not allowed an opinion on foxhunting and another animal welfare issues because I'm not a vegetarian?
 
Buzz sw9 said:
Enough said :D I think

Why? I suggest you try and argue your point.

Are only vegetarians allowed to have an opinion - yes/no?

Actually, fuck it - like I said, I can't be bothered...
 
I don't think Geri should have to answer all of your questions in detail Buzz.

Personally I'm chuffed that this barbaric "sport" is finally going to be outlawed!
 
Buzz sw9 said:
you don't have the first idea what my views on fox hunting are, do you?
You're prolly right but I can't be bothered to wade through eight pages of posts to ascertain your precise views, sorry.

You can summarise them now if you like.
 
General Ludd said:
When have I claimed the CA was there for any of those things? But that list of grievances are the reason why lots of working class people are there today and even more working class people support the CA. However inadequate the CA is as an organisation to express those grievances and however inadequate fox hunting is as an issue to gather around, that is precisely what is happening.

I agree

i have only skimed the thread so appologies if this has been already been mentioned,but at the time of the liberty and livelihood march the CA,with the help of the EDP*1 did seem to be trying to build a widespread grassroots campaign taking on board genuine rural concerns about fuel increases (which does significantly and disproportionately affect the rural wc,where public transport is non existant),low wages,lack of affordable housing,rural deprivation,inward and outward migration as well as concerns about job insecurity linked to both the scrapping of CAP and Banning Foxhunting,and Bank and Sub post office closures .By no means were the large numbers of people on the L+L march their on a single issue campaign.
Yet the whole march was represented as being about Fox hunting the other concerns which drew people to the march were either marginalised or ignored altogether.subsequent interviews with CA organisers does seem to bear this out that in their minds Foxhunting was the prime motivation for the organisers but to the grassroots their concerns go much deeper.




Sad but fucking true.


*1 Eastern Daily Press
 
Why don't the swp forget about being the vanguard of the working class and instead adopt these ca types and be their vanguard.They said themselves that its wrong to hold on to"shiboleths" so its not going too much against trot doctrine.
Then when the've led middle england to a succesful revolution and smashed the capitalist state they can put all the yokels/toffs ect into a concentration camp and allow the w/c to take over.
 
I do - i don't accept that they exist other than as an idealised version of past social relations. Most rural w/c relationships nowadays are based on the brute force of wage labour - there are no deferent peasnts, there are very few people dependent upon the local landowner - what there is, is nornal wage labour and nornal class war and hatred. This is not serf territory.
Further to that, rural bosses gave up on any pretence of being part of an older, patriachical, moral economy and the working class followed very soon after, if not before. In economic relationships I don't think any deference still exists. Wearing wellies and drinking cider doesn't make rural working class people dupes! (Whilst there are cultural and linguistic remnants of this they are, in my opinion, rather irrelevant when it comes to actual class relationships.)
 
Back
Top Bottom