totaladdict
Well-Known Member
So? Maybe he'd rather work on a farm...Smølfine said:*dousafavour*
and I can guarantee he is better paid on the lorrys than working on a farm for sure.
So? Maybe he'd rather work on a farm...Smølfine said:*dousafavour*
and I can guarantee he is better paid on the lorrys than working on a farm for sure.
totaladdict said:So? Maybe he'd rather work on a farm...
butchersapron said:*********
My fault
Eh?Red Jezza said:Furthermore, rural w/c types are entombed in a culture that tends to go long on deference and 'respecting one's betters'.
True... nice bit of solidarity btw....Smølfine said:We'd all like to be doing other jobs.
Sack of spuds and all that? It is, of course, (stagist, anachronistic) bollocks.totaladdict said:Eh?
(I have read the thread btw, just thought that needed questionning even though it was way back on page 6.)
there are very strong rural traditions of tradition, deference, 'everyone knowing their place' and insularity. these traditions die hard.totaladdict said:Eh?
(I have read the thread btw, just thought that needed questionning even though it was way back on page 6.)
I do - i don't accept that they exist other than as an idealised version of past social relations. Most rural w/c relationships nowadays are based on the brute force of wage labour - there are no deferent peasnts, there are very few people dependent upon the local landowner - what there is, is nornal wage labour and nornal class war and hatred. This is not serf territory.Red Jezza said:there are very strong rural traditions of tradition, deference, 'everyone knowing their place' and insularity. these traditions die hard.
You want proof? hang out in deepest rural Gloucestershire or hunting territory.
I do live in countryside, Jezza.Red Jezza said:there are very strong rural traditions of tradition, deference, 'everyone knowing their place' and insularity. these traditions die hard.
You want proof? hang out in deepest rural Gloucestershire or hunting territory.
Buzz sw9 said:I'd take a very different view and say it is "fucking idiotic" to waste so much time on an issue that will do NO GOOD to the working people of this country, if they are not killed by someone on a horse with dogs they will be shot, poisoned, trapped etc. Why are you getting so excited about it? It is an animal that is going to be killed by someone in some manor.
I'm not saying it's all tugged forelocks round your way, or that rural communities are mired in the 50s, on the top of a choccy box tin. I also agree that this tradition has grown less in my life (mainly due, I'd surmise to changing social & economic patterns), and less influential - but I'd maintain you can still see it. It will die out, but god knows when. And it is certainly part of rural social history. I'd also say the 'tradition' element (cf. 'we do things this way cos we always have - it's our way') and the insularity will completely disappear last, long after that deference; like most psycho-social relationships, it is complex and cannot be quantified or broken down into constituent parts.butchersapron said:I do - i don't accept that they exist other than as an idealised version of past social relations. Most rural w/c relationships nowadays are based on the brute force of wage labour - there are no deferent peasnts, there are very few people dependent upon the local landowner - what there is, is nornal wage labour and nornal class war and hatred. This is not serf territory.
General Ludd said:You may have thought they wore red coats cause they were posh fox hunting tossers but secretly they've been plotting commie revolution.
(I'd bet there are proportionally more working class people on this march, and more working class people who go fox hunting, than were at any of the anti-war marches though)
I refer you to my answer to butchersapron, as his post was what you would have said, given sufficient time and thought.totaladdict said:I do live in countryside, Jezza.
An you're talking bollocks, bor.
huh? you wha'?totaladdict said:Yes! Down with country traditions - can't have the peasants feeling a sense of community!
again - impossible to quantify. yes, there have been huge changes (the great farming disaster, for one), and yes they add up, collectively, to a far greater impact than my oral history. impossible to disagree with that.butchersapron said:But your personal notices really don't add up to to a hill of beans when mounted aginst the massive changes of work structure and patterns that have occoured down here over the last 25 years mate. Your's reads like something out of a post-WW1 middle class novel rather than the reality.
fair enough!butchersapron said:Ah, but now you're tying the existence of wage labour up with an automatic solidarity...but yes, i do think you'e overstating - and that, to a great extent you miss the core dynamics behind 'country life' today - but you're still a good 'un
Buzz sw9 said:Calm down dear! It’s only a bulletin board (shouldn’t that be commercial) I didn’t say any of the things you mention above, it is about proportionality.
Let me ask you three direct questions please:
Do you think that it is right that so much parliamentary time has been spent over the last 7 years on this issue when they could have pushed it through the first time if they had wanted to?
Do you eat meat or wear leather?
Have you read all my posts on this thread?
Buzz sw9 said:Enough said I think
You're prolly right but I can't be bothered to wade through eight pages of posts to ascertain your precise views, sorry.Buzz sw9 said:you don't have the first idea what my views on fox hunting are, do you?
General Ludd said:When have I claimed the CA was there for any of those things? But that list of grievances are the reason why lots of working class people are there today and even more working class people support the CA. However inadequate the CA is as an organisation to express those grievances and however inadequate fox hunting is as an issue to gather around, that is precisely what is happening.
Further to that, rural bosses gave up on any pretence of being part of an older, patriachical, moral economy and the working class followed very soon after, if not before. In economic relationships I don't think any deference still exists. Wearing wellies and drinking cider doesn't make rural working class people dupes! (Whilst there are cultural and linguistic remnants of this they are, in my opinion, rather irrelevant when it comes to actual class relationships.)I do - i don't accept that they exist other than as an idealised version of past social relations. Most rural w/c relationships nowadays are based on the brute force of wage labour - there are no deferent peasnts, there are very few people dependent upon the local landowner - what there is, is nornal wage labour and nornal class war and hatred. This is not serf territory.