Yes, I suppose the kind of people who just have to go on holiday are also the kind of people who won't fucking respect quarantine.Hundreds of UK tourists flee Covid quarantine in Swiss ski resort
Depressing, but pretty much exactly the kind of behaviour I'd expect, if they're anything like the people I know who just had to have a little holiday, every time a travel corridor opened up.
not unexpected unfortunatelyRussia admits to world's third-worst Covid-19 death toll
More than 186,000 Russians have died due to coronavirus, three times more than previously reportedwww.theguardian.com
Hundreds of UK tourists flee Covid quarantine in Swiss ski resort
Depressing, but pretty much exactly the kind of behaviour I'd expect, if they're anything like the people I know who just had to have a little holiday, every time a travel corridor opened up.
Looking just at death rates, quite a few European countries where things had been getting quite bad seem to have had quite a sudden drop-off in the past week or two, and it can be seen in the all-EU count too. Is that real or just an artefact of delayed reporting over Christmas I wonder?
I'm right in thinking in the UK, excess deaths this year are about 20% above the previous 5 years? I'm having a great trouble understanding why some relatively bright people don't understand CoVID is real and want the most obvious data
That's really helpful. Much appreciated!There are many different sorts of data which obviously demonstrate the seriousness of the pandemic. No measure is perfect, for example excess deaths figures are not capturing the picture fully because lockdowns, recession and behavioural changes mean there have been less deaths from various other causes, and we probably wont get all the flu deaths we normally have.
For example, using data published for the year so far, I have 583,330 deaths average over last 5 years, and 658,712 actual deaths this year. So a difference of 75,382. But I am confident that the number of Covid-19 related deaths so far this year is quite a bit higher than that. If I fiddle around by skipping the first months of the year before the pandemic virus really took hold, I get more like 81,000 excess deaths. If I were able to accurately mess with the baseline so that it took account of less deaths from other causes, it would not surprise me if I came up with a figure more like 100,000 by the years end, but that will be controversial and I couldnt claim that the number would be spot on. Its somewhere in that ballpark though I'm afraid.
(I laughed because I used a gif of that picture for something else on here yesterday).
Not just Brits. It's generally people doing careless travelling. I know a lot of people who went on holidays this summer, from everywhere to everywhere. That's why Germany and Austria closed their skiing resorts. Because they didn't want tourists from anywhere.Just what is it about Brits abroad
It was the behaviour of Dutch students that got the GNR out with batons here early summer not the Brits .Not just Brits. It's generally people doing careless travelling. I know a lot of people who went on holidays this summer, from everywhere to everywhere. That's why Germany and Austria closed their skiing resorts. Because they didn't want tourists from anywhere.
Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated. No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. 107 of 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 patients tested positive again (re-positive rate 0.31%, 95% CI 0.423–0.574%). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan was therefore very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.
Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China - Nature Communications
Large-scale population screening can provide insights to levels of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Here, the authors report a citywide screening of ~10,000,000 residents of Wuhan and show that SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence was very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.www.nature.com
Anyone know about this, which is being promoted as saying that asymptomatic transmission is a fallacy, and so there is no need for lockdowns?
Will the virus become another endemic virus? Or will it be possible to eradicate or eliminate it?
The existence of vaccines does not guarantee eradication or elimination.
The paper itself outlines many of its own shortcomings ("this study has several limitations that need to be discussed"), not limited to: low test sensitivity, 2 channel PCR, potential high false negative rate, low sampling rate (no continuous monitoring of subjects; not surprising if you have millions!). No discussion of sequencing and consequences this can have for validity of results in the light of what we have learned since it was published.Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China - Nature Communications
Large-scale population screening can provide insights to levels of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Here, the authors report a citywide screening of ~10,000,000 residents of Wuhan and show that SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence was very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.www.nature.com
Anyone know about this, which is being promoted as saying that asymptomatic transmission is a fallacy, and so there is no need for lockdowns?
Vaccines are currently being administered to those in the UK most at risk and will reduce illness and death. They aren't yet known to prevent perhaps transmission. Unless everyone is vaccinated and travel severely limited, it seems unlikely we can eliminate the virus by vaccine alone.The likes of Whitty assume thats what will happen. I try to be slightly more openminded than that, but its still a rather likely prospect. If an alternative approach with an alternative outcomes is strongly considered by many countries that are currently allergic to ideas such as zero covid (total suppression), it wont be for a long time yet, and then that final piece of orthodoxy could be laid to rest. Not very likely, its just I never say never, especially in a pandemic.
GNA Biosolutions said its test is based on a new class of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology, which has become the global standard of reliable testing. Its so-called pulse controlled amplification(PCA) technology had proved to deliver 96.7% accurate results.
The new test has already had test runs at Munich Airport. The German health authority was checking the test results in a pilot study which should be completed in February, Chief Executive Federico Buersgens said at a news conference.
Unlike the widely-used PCR tests, which have to be analysed in laboratories and usually take about a day before results are delivered, GNA Biosolutions’ test comes with a portable analyzer and provides results for up to eight tests within 45 minutes, the company said.
I'm right in thinking in the UK, excess deaths this year are about 20% above the previous 5 years? I'm having a great trouble understanding why some relatively bright people don't understand CoVID is real and want the most obvious data
I was thinking more along the lines of thank god, a Republican at last.Only 41.