Two or five years is certainly too much when your parents are of the age that there's no guarantee they'll still be around in that time, regardless of Covid. I think people will just start doing the pre-quarantining thing, with varying degrees of rigour. Maybe it'll be a way of getting people to spend a bit longer doing visits, travelling a bit slower, instead of rushed fly-bys though.Not asking you or anyone to answer this personally obvs but I’m preoccupied with the parental hug question, because they keep asking me (theyre both mid seventies & not in UK). If staying away from them for the greater good / increased chance of a vaccine being developed means staying away for five years that’s too much, imo. Two years is long.
I read recently that thousands of German POWs were put in the fields for fruit and crop picking after the Second World War .
Yep. For me I’d have to fly to see them (or drive for days which would be safer but still not safe) so for now anyway it feels impossible. What I’d like to figure out is some marker (for myself) that would mean that the risk I’d pose them by going to see them is worth it, iykwim.
Very sad:
Station ticket office worker dies with Covid-19 after being spat at
The Late Belly Mujinga
Anyone who saw Ms Mujinga being spat on at London's Victoria Station on 22 March 2020 can contact British Transport Police by texting 61016 or calling 0800 40 50 40 quoting reference 359 of 11/05/20.
When can we throw rocks at this gov?
Sounds a bit like confirming the obvious to me. Do we learn anything useful from this?
Sounds a bit like confirming the obvious to me. Do we learn anything useful from this?
Papers and media are killing people
My questions (not targeted at you, elbows - thanks for sharing the info ):
Papers and media are killing people
The Cummings thing is an absolutely disgusting shitshow. And how the hell is this even framed as a breach (a potential one as that) of travelling in lockdown rules. He's travelled the breadth of the country with the fucking virus, knowingly! Or is this yet another one of the brilliant reverse psychology stints, because people were too afraid to come out of lockdown, so that we now all say "to hell with the consequences"? It makes me so angry.
On another note, just had a little look how things are going in Germany, and posting this here because I guess experiences are pertinent to UK emerging from lockdown. Quick google and two headlines of the day: 7 infected after restaurant visit in the north of Germany, now 50 contact persons in quarantine and rising as more potential contacts are attempted to be notifed and isolated. 40 people infected after a religious service in Frankfurt. Both the restaurant and the church claim that distancing and hygiene rules were followed, which I guess, they would say and it might not be true. But it might be true, and it might just go to show how massive a role aerosol transmission does play, and that just distancing to minimise droplet infection and hand-hygiene to minimise contact transmission (which in my understanding is a fairly low risk anyway) does precious little in enclosed spaces.
Evidence is useful, even if it's for what we all already know is the case. Plus, we humans often get a cause or mechanism badly wrong when we rely on intuition and introspection (which can then lead us down all sorts of useless or dangerous paths). It's worth checking things.Sounds a bit like confirming the obvious to me. Do we learn anything useful from this?
My questions (not targeted at you, elbows - thanks for sharing the info ):
How come this is available privately, before via the NHS? (What's the process that means this is possible.)
Why is it available now? (I'm assuming for cash, but if there are any 'good' reasons for this being available via this route, it would be good to hear.)
Is it worth it?
Does the Abbott test data from private tests get recorded on a central database anywhere? So would it be included in '5% of people had it' type headlines?