binka
!!!!!!!!!
Please explain what you meanso if you had your way what's now poland would be full of germans.
Please explain what you meanso if you had your way what's now poland would be full of germans.
did you not notice the pre-war poland to the e of the post-war poland and what's now poland pre-45 was largely german?Please explain what you mean
Yes i am aware poland moved a couple of hundred miles to the west. No i don't think the misery that followed was a good thingdid you not notice the pre-war poland to the e of the post-war poland and what's now poland pre-45 was largely german?
so, as i say, if you had your way...Yes i am aware poland moved a couple of hundred miles to the west. No i don't think the misery that followed was a good thing
What's your point?so, as i say, if you had your way...
i am surprised you have taken the attitude you have, is allWhat's your point?
What part of it do you have a problem with?i am surprised you have taken the attitude you have, is all
just surprised by your attitude to the expulsion of the germans while silent about the causes of that expulsion.What part of it do you have a problem with?
Ohjust surprised by your attitude to the expulsion of the germans while silent about the causes of that expulsion.
What we can know, I think, with a pretty high amount of certainty, is this: If the Falkland Islanders had been black, the racist Margaret Thatcher would not have started a war in their name.
Her words: they were 'of British tradition and stock'
translation: They were white.
they are 300 miles off the coast so not that near argentina either.
I just wonder how you felt about the Chagossians. Hmmm? Did you get as wound up about their plight? I bet you didn't utter a sound.
The Falklands Islands are little more than an object of right-wing political correctness. Whenever anyone expresses a point of view that isn't aligned with the dominant narrative, it is seen as a heretical or worse: 'the mark of a loony lefty'.
Tad closer than the UK though.
Point about the Falklands is that the events were a gift to a struggling Thatcher. A gift that won her the next election from being in a position, pre-Falklands, of almost certainly losing to Michael Foot. And yeah, the gift came gift wrapped in a red, WHITE and blue union jack.
Could you translate that last sentence?It is quite an telling issue from the POV of Corbyn's leadership though and not a distraction to talk about it.
The Falklands has nothing to offer Corbyn apart from grief. He has no reason to act quickly on it or against the sensitivities of most of the electorate. No one is going to die if things stay as they are. No disabled or needy person is losing their benefits over it - they are losing them because of a colossal wealth grab by the ruling classes.
Negotiating on the Falklands shouldn't get near derailing opposing that effectively, getting elected and righting the wrong.
Which might have gone some way to explaining why he's a bit grumpy about the whole thingSorry, i thought you were at Port Stanley, etc.
Haven't we had enough already about the Falkland Islands, please? There's entire threads devoted to it lying around here someplace.
there are - whats interesting is how incilindary the topic is in domestic political terms, and how unconnected the views held are from the left-right party political split.
none of which i think is remotely good news for Labour, primarily because it says - to me - that not only does Corbyn have something of an understanding gap regarding the electorate, but that he simply can't help himself with regards to what appear to be obscure areas of policy but which are politically explosive.
the evidence, to me, looks pretty solid that Corbyns domestic economic policies are very popular amongst a wide swathe of the electorate far outside the left of the Labour party, but that his foreign, security and defence policies/views are toxic outside the Stop the War Coalition. if he can keep his gob shut about things that offend the electorate then he can make progress, but it appears that that is a political skill he doesn't have, and doesn't appear willing to learn - he did, after, walk into the Argentine Embassy for a chat, and thats what started this. he didn't need to do that, he gained nothing by doing it, and theres no one with even the most limited grasp of politics who couldn't have told him he was on a hiding to nothing - but he did it anyway because its one of his personal bugbears.
politics and winning elections requires discipline and sometimes biting your lip on more minor issues in order to win on bigger ones - Corbyn appears not to have that talent.
Oh ok, I thought you meant it seriously, I've been in stitchesErm, thats my point, Corbyn really should ditch that shower.