Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Corbyn & Cabinet in the Media

Tbf if the islanders had been black and the uk goverement could have got something of value tought shit islanders although if somebody had attacked said islanders though diffrent matter.

Argentina whining about uk using force to seize the island is a bit laughable considering argentina went on to commit genocide in its "conquest of the desert":facepalm: patagonia
 
Just visted the place people area bit odd but definitly british so leave them alone the islands are no threat or problem to argentina they are 300 miles off the coast so not that near argentina either.
 
What we can know, I think, with a pretty high amount of certainty, is this: If the Falkland Islanders had been black, the racist Margaret Thatcher would not have started a war in their name.

Her words: they were 'of British tradition and stock'

translation: They were white.

It's precisely because they are mostly white anglo saxon and not hispanic that you think they should leave and that you and Nino won't see them as a similar colonial leftover to hispanic South America.
 
they are 300 miles off the coast so not that near argentina either.

Tad closer than the UK though.

Point about the Falklands is that the events were a gift to a struggling Thatcher. A gift that won her the next election from being in a position, pre-Falklands, of almost certainly losing to Michael Foot. And yeah, the gift came gift wrapped in a red, WHITE and blue union jack.
 
I just wonder how you felt about the Chagossians. Hmmm? Did you get as wound up about their plight? I bet you didn't utter a sound.

The Falklands Islands are little more than an object of right-wing political correctness. Whenever anyone expresses a point of view that isn't aligned with the dominant narrative, it is seen as a heretical or worse: 'the mark of a loony lefty'.

You seem to just throw unconnected crap around when lost for a reasonable point.

Tell us why their position is different to all the other colonial descendants in the region and what would you propose is done?

Me, I'd like to see their right to stay put acknowledged, the area dimilitarised and protected from dangerous resource exploitation. The Falkland Islanders should develop their commercial and cultural links and allow others to settle there like any other country. No reason why Argentina can't be involved and benefit.
 
Tad closer than the UK though.

Point about the Falklands is that the events were a gift to a struggling Thatcher. A gift that won her the next election from being in a position, pre-Falklands, of almost certainly losing to Michael Foot. And yeah, the gift came gift wrapped in a red, WHITE and blue union jack.

Yeah, but that's UK mainland business - nothing to do with the rights and the wrongs of the Falkland Islanders position. Did Thatcher exploit the issue? - of course she did. Did she pursue all courses of peaceful resolution? - no. But it's moot concerning the issue now and what Jezza is thinking out loud about it.
 
It is quite an telling issue from the POV of Corbyn's leadership though and not a distraction to talk about it.

The Falklands has nothing to offer Corbyn apart from grief. He has no reason to act quickly on it or against the sensitivities of most of the electorate. No one is going to die if things stay as they are. No disabled or needy person is losing their benefits over it - they are losing them because of a colossal wealth grab by the ruling classes.

Negotiating on the Falklands shouldn't get near derailing opposing that effectively, getting elected and righting the wrong.
 
It is quite an telling issue from the POV of Corbyn's leadership though and not a distraction to talk about it.

The Falklands has nothing to offer Corbyn apart from grief. He has no reason to act quickly on it or against the sensitivities of most of the electorate. No one is going to die if things stay as they are. No disabled or needy person is losing their benefits over it - they are losing them because of a colossal wealth grab by the ruling classes.

Negotiating on the Falklands shouldn't get near derailing opposing that effectively, getting elected and righting the wrong.
Could you translate that last sentence?
 
Their was no possible peaceful neogciation with the junta other than captitulation to the junta whose next move was going to be to attack chile :facepalm:

somthe falklands war probably saved more lives as chile vs argentina would have been a full on blood bath with generals throwing conscripts into the frontlines :(
 
Haven't we had enough already about the Falkland Islands, please? There's entire threads devoted to it lying around here someplace.
 
Its been a good day in parliament for Jeremy - Cameron rattled and defensive.

Google tax: David Cameron defends £130m UK tax deal - BBC News

"one rule for big multinational companies, and another for ordinary small businesses and self-employed workers".

Signs here that Labour are taking seriously the middle class, and Corbyn's reference to self employed workers will no doubt delight many within that category who are in the process of submitting their tax to the revenue.

The vermin are starting to look quite vulnerable to me, with the judiciary undermining them on bedroom tax, nuclear power looking dubious, loads of multinationals evading tax will be a sore that will fester on and on..

Its all reasonable. Or am i too optimistic? Time will tell.
 
Haven't we had enough already about the Falkland Islands, please? There's entire threads devoted to it lying around here someplace.

there are - whats interesting is how incilindary the topic is in domestic political terms, and how unconnected the views held are from the left-right party political split.

none of which i think is remotely good news for Labour, primarily because it says - to me - that not only does Corbyn have something of an understanding gap regarding the electorate, but that he simply can't help himself with regards to what appear to be obscure areas of policy but which are politically explosive.

the evidence, to me, looks pretty solid that Corbyns domestic economic policies are very popular amongst a wide swathe of the electorate far outside the left of the Labour party, but that his foreign, security and defence policies/views are toxic outside the Stop the War Coalition. if he can keep his gob shut about things that offend the electorate then he can make progress, but it appears that that is a political skill he doesn't have, and doesn't appear willing to learn - he did, after, walk into the Argentine Embassy for a chat, and thats what started this. he didn't need to do that, he gained nothing by doing it, and theres no one with even the most limited grasp of politics who couldn't have told him he was on a hiding to nothing - but he did it anyway because its one of his personal bugbears.

politics and winning elections requires discipline and sometimes biting your lip on more minor issues in order to win on bigger ones - Corbyn appears not to have that talent.
 
there are - whats interesting is how incilindary the topic is in domestic political terms, and how unconnected the views held are from the left-right party political split.

none of which i think is remotely good news for Labour, primarily because it says - to me - that not only does Corbyn have something of an understanding gap regarding the electorate, but that he simply can't help himself with regards to what appear to be obscure areas of policy but which are politically explosive.

the evidence, to me, looks pretty solid that Corbyns domestic economic policies are very popular amongst a wide swathe of the electorate far outside the left of the Labour party, but that his foreign, security and defence policies/views are toxic outside the Stop the War Coalition. if he can keep his gob shut about things that offend the electorate then he can make progress, but it appears that that is a political skill he doesn't have, and doesn't appear willing to learn - he did, after, walk into the Argentine Embassy for a chat, and thats what started this. he didn't need to do that, he gained nothing by doing it, and theres no one with even the most limited grasp of politics who couldn't have told him he was on a hiding to nothing - but he did it anyway because its one of his personal bugbears.

politics and winning elections requires discipline and sometimes biting your lip on more minor issues in order to win on bigger ones - Corbyn appears not to have that talent.

You do know the STWC is helmed by those very successful party builders(SWP) and politicians(German stood for London Mayor, with derisory results, etc) John Rees, Lyndsey German, and Chris Nineham
 
Back
Top Bottom