Shirley Williams predicting "the inevitable". I don't think it will get that far, but it could.
Milne has flexed his muscles, then, and Corbyn moves further left.
No, Corbyn entrenches. Changing a media adviser is not moving the party
He wasn't just a media adviser. Though you are probably right - entrenches - Milne included.
Fuck this thread's gone to shit now. Gonna ignore the nob. There was interesting discussion once.
Well now the check shirted voice of the left has spoken I suppose there is nothing more to sayIs this irrational hysteria?View attachment 82439
I see many of you have no real interest in the Labour Party apart from cheerleading from your armchairs.
Like most Corbynistas.
Good old Shirley, twice helped the tories into office and sold the NHS. Not surprised you find her judgements sound.Shirley Williams predicting "the inevitable". I don't think it will get that far, but it could.
Yup, it's just a shit troll. I mean, nobody could be that stupid and dishonest, it just has to be a troll.Fuck this thread's gone to shit now. Gonna ignore the nob. There was interesting discussion once.
Good old Shirley, twice helped the tories into office and sold the NHS. Not surprised you find her judgements sound.
Is this irrational hysteria?View attachment 82439
I see many of you have no real interest in the Labour Party apart from cheerleading from your armchairs.
Like most Corbynistas.
Dunno. I think this might be what debate looks like when your idea of informing yourself is to follow people on twitter.Yup, it's just a shit troll. I mean, nobody could be that stupid and dishonest, it just has to be a troll.
Dunno. I think this might be what debate looks like when your idea of informing yourself is to follow people on twitter.
Well now the check shirted voice of the left has spoken I suppose there is nothing more to say
Can you name me the person that is best suited as leader of the Labour party, MarkyMarrk?
The headline is flat wrong. Most of the new members are not from that category at all.This is a weird piece
Labour's new members mostly wealthy city dwellers – leaked report
Looks a lot like a case of creatively using stats to tell the story they want - namely that Corbyns Labour is now a party of the rich urban elite, and therefore out of touch
Even though, as the piece briefly mentions, only 11% of members fit this category
The headline is flat wrong. Most of the new members are not from that category at all.
quite. and then the piece finsihes off with a couple of jab quotes from what is now Labours Looney FringeThe headline is flat wrong. Most of the new members are not from that category at all.
Oh,bollocks I live in central London and forked out three quid, I'd hoped that would make me a member of the urban elite.The headline is flat wrong. Most of the new members are not from that category at all.
do you eat croissants at breakfast seeking to lay the foundations for a socialist revolution? Lord Watts wants to know...Oh,bollocks I live in central London and forked out three quid, I'd hoped that would make me a member of the urban elite.
leave him beMarkyMarrk are you a subeditor for the guardian?
from what i hear (from someone who has been to some local meetings) theres Momentum leadership, who are desperately trying to keep a semblance of control over it, and then theres everyone in involved who are doing what they want independently of the leadership.Momentum's leadership does seem a bit posh, which might explain their priorities, but most young members if they are graduates will have massive debts, etc.
They started with a conclusion, worked backwards from it and found it to be wrong, then decided to run with it anyway