Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Corbyn & Cabinet in the Media

When the latter was left in tatters in 2008-9, the extent of that victory was shown in that the left had no coherent response and only a minority of the western population demanded or even casually sought an alternative.
I don't know about 'victory' but there's a depressing element of truth in this.
 
New Labour was merely responding to the cultural and political shift caused by the victory of neo-liberal economics.
so they weren't themselves neo-liberals, just responding to this 'victory' of uncertain date. which might have been eight years before blair became leader of the labour party. or it might have been eighteen years before he became leader of the labour party. but you don't know when it was.
 
i was hoping you'd offer a sensible reply. too much to hope for, obviously.
Ask a sensible question then.

Jesus, how long can you carry on with this trying to lead people around in pointless circles and trying to derail every topic trick of yours? It makes you seem weird, not clever.
 
my point is very simple: that the leaders of new labour were neo-liberal, they were not responding the this victory you claim occurred (but as noted you dare not say when it was). now, when do you think this victory occurred?
Never said they weren't neo liberal. In a different era they might not have been. They responded to the victory of neo-liberal economics, which had been established sometime between the faltering of the post-war consensus and the time of their electoral victory, by working within the consensus established by that neo-liberal victory.

But, of course, you already know all this. So is it fair to ask if you'll go and waste somebody else's time?
 
Last edited:
Never said they weren't neo liberal. In a different era they might not have been. They responded to the victory of neo-liberal economics, which had been established sometime between the faltering of the post-war consensus and the time of their electoral victory, by working within the consensus established by that neo-liberal victory.

But, of course, you already know all this. So is it fair to ask if you'll go and waste somebody else's time?
no time need have been wasted if you'd only said to start off with that you're a banned returner; any more recent arriver would not have known me from adam, given me the answer and avoided this whole palaver.
 
Never said they weren't neo liberal. In a different era they might not have been. They responded to the victory of neo-liberal economics, which had been established sometime between the faltering of the post-war consensus and the time of their electoral victory, by working within the consensus established by that neo-liberal victory.
people who 'respond' to 'something' traditionally not that 'something': people responding to the rise of fascism, people responding to twats who claim to be newbies; etc etc etc.
 
An ICM poll has got Labour drawing level. I don't know where that comes from in the sense that it wasn't expected. ICM are the only pollsters not to change methodology since the general election, but I'm sure that Corbynistas will suspend their disbelief in polls temporarily and clear ICM of any doubt for the next four years.
It must have given you quite a start, eh?

Are you ignoring me, MarkyMarrk?
 
I believe Guido broke it. It's a reasonable story to break tbf - but connecting it with Corbyn is totally disingenuous.

These anti-Semites should be cleared out of the Labour Party but at the same time the weaponising of anti-Semitism accusations which are then extrapolated to accuse the Labour Party in its entirety, or at least the leadership, of anti-Semitism is a dangerous precedent. The Tory Party is now fully committed to a strategy of fearmongering amongst some minority communities, partly by setting them against each other. Take this Goldsmith leaflet as an example

CdgXQ24XEAEtAjR.jpg
 
These anti-Semites should be cleared out of the Labour Party but at the same time the weaponising of anti-Semitism accusations which are then extrapolated to accuse the Labour Party in its entirety, or at least the leadership, of anti-Semitism is a dangerous precedent. The Tory Party is now fully committed to a strategy of fearmongering amongst some minority communities, partly by setting them against each other. Take this Goldsmith leaflet as an example

CdgXQ24XEAEtAjR.jpg

Wow. 'Some of my best friends are Indian.'

and

'Don't forget he's Pakistani...'
 
These anti-Semites should be cleared out of the Labour Party but at the same time the weaponising of anti-Semitism accusations which are then extrapolated to accuse the Labour Party in its entirety, or at least the leadership, of anti-Semitism is a dangerous precedent. The Tory Party is now fully committed to a strategy of fearmongering amongst some minority communities, partly by setting them against each other. Take this Goldsmith leaflet as an example

CdgXQ24XEAEtAjR.jpg


Disgusting pure communalism, playing with fire.
 
hm, if you're going to let the likes of oswaldtwistle back on, then the same courtesy should be extended to lletsa IMO. He actually has something useful to say in among the miserableism.
 
Disgusting pure communalism, playing with fire.

There was a good amount of it in the election, and in the run up to it, last year which flew under the radar. The Tories pandered to Hindu bigots by opposing a ban on caste discrimination and in return their got a good amount of their votes.
 

For someone who's ranted about the stereotyping of black people, you're awfully free with posting a link that stereotypes Jewish people.

The article you link to is an emotionalist piece of shit, by the way. The opening paragraph 2 paragraphs - a full third of the entire article- are about Yad Vashem, effectively appealing to the holocaust as a marker for letting the state of Israel get on with what it does best. The author claims that anti-Semitism didn't exist in the Labour Party until Corbyn and "the left" took over. It's interesting that you blame "the left", too, just like the author.
It's interesting because Kirby had already been disciplined for this sort of behaviour under Miliband. So much for anti-Semitism not existing in the Labour Party until Corbyn, eh?
 
Back
Top Bottom