OK then it didn't. Socialism around corner.now, when did this victory occur?
let yer man answer, if you think he has the wherewithalabout 1976 iirc
come on now, killer b's helped you out - would you agree with 1976?OK then it didn't. Socialism around corner.
let yer man answer, if you think he has the wherewithal
I don't know about 'victory' but there's a depressing element of truth in this.When the latter was left in tatters in 2008-9, the extent of that victory was shown in that the left had no coherent response and only a minority of the western population demanded or even casually sought an alternative.
i was hoping you'd offer a sensible reply. too much to hope for, obviously.October 17th 1986. About 3AM. Bright lights seen in sky.
so they weren't themselves neo-liberals, just responding to this 'victory' of uncertain date. which might have been eight years before blair became leader of the labour party. or it might have been eighteen years before he became leader of the labour party. but you don't know when it was.New Labour was merely responding to the cultural and political shift caused by the victory of neo-liberal economics.
Ask a sensible question then.i was hoping you'd offer a sensible reply. too much to hope for, obviously.
my point is very simple: that the leaders of new labour were neo-liberal, they were not responding the this victory you claim occurred (but as noted you dare not say when it was). now, when do you think this victory occurred?Ask a sensible question then.
Never said they weren't neo liberal. In a different era they might not have been. They responded to the victory of neo-liberal economics, which had been established sometime between the faltering of the post-war consensus and the time of their electoral victory, by working within the consensus established by that neo-liberal victory.my point is very simple: that the leaders of new labour were neo-liberal, they were not responding the this victory you claim occurred (but as noted you dare not say when it was). now, when do you think this victory occurred?
no time need have been wasted if you'd only said to start off with that you're a banned returner; any more recent arriver would not have known me from adam, given me the answer and avoided this whole palaver.Never said they weren't neo liberal. In a different era they might not have been. They responded to the victory of neo-liberal economics, which had been established sometime between the faltering of the post-war consensus and the time of their electoral victory, by working within the consensus established by that neo-liberal victory.
But, of course, you already know all this. So is it fair to ask if you'll go and waste somebody else's time?
people who 'respond' to 'something' traditionally not that 'something': people responding to the rise of fascism, people responding to twats who claim to be newbies; etc etc etc.Never said they weren't neo liberal. In a different era they might not have been. They responded to the victory of neo-liberal economics, which had been established sometime between the faltering of the post-war consensus and the time of their electoral victory, by working within the consensus established by that neo-liberal victory.
That semi-fascist shit-stirrer Guido gleefully carried this story yesterday.
Drivel.The left is failing the Jewish people again: A Place and Name: the Left is Failing the Jewish People Again
It must have given you quite a start, eh?An ICM poll has got Labour drawing level. I don't know where that comes from in the sense that it wasn't expected. ICM are the only pollsters not to change methodology since the general election, but I'm sure that Corbynistas will suspend their disbelief in polls temporarily and clear ICM of any doubt for the next four years.
Yeah.people who 'respond' to 'something' traditionally not that 'something': people responding to the rise of fascism, people responding to twats who claim to be newbies; etc etc etc.
Yeah.no time need have been wasted if you'd only said to start off with that you're a banned returner; any more recent arriver would not have known me from adam, given me the answer and avoided this whole palaver.
only if you're really luckyIt must have given you quite a start, eh?
Are you ignoring me, MarkyMarrk?
I believe Guido broke it. It's a reasonable story to break tbf - but connecting it with Corbyn is totally disingenuous.That semi-fascist shit-stirrer Guido gleefully carried this story yesterday.
I believe Guido broke it. It's a reasonable story to break tbf - but connecting it with Corbyn is totally disingenuous.
You have an overactive imagination.One would hope its an anomaly - if it is not, it spells a very dark future for Britain's proud tradition of democracy and liberalism.
These anti-Semites should be cleared out of the Labour Party but at the same time the weaponising of anti-Semitism accusations which are then extrapolated to accuse the Labour Party in its entirety, or at least the leadership, of anti-Semitism is a dangerous precedent. The Tory Party is now fully committed to a strategy of fearmongering amongst some minority communities, partly by setting them against each other. Take this Goldsmith leaflet as an example
These anti-Semites should be cleared out of the Labour Party but at the same time the weaponising of anti-Semitism accusations which are then extrapolated to accuse the Labour Party in its entirety, or at least the leadership, of anti-Semitism is a dangerous precedent. The Tory Party is now fully committed to a strategy of fearmongering amongst some minority communities, partly by setting them against each other. Take this Goldsmith leaflet as an example
Disgusting pure communalism, playing with fire.
Disgusting pure communalism, playing with fire.
The left is failing the Jewish people again: A Place and Name: the Left is Failing the Jewish People Again
It must have given you quite a start, eh?
Are you ignoring me, MarkyMarrk?