editor
hiraethified
Superb!foo said:zArk, have you got WTC tourettes?
I think it may be time to show zArk the door as he seems stuck in some strange, endless cycle of conspiraloonery and I suspect things aren't going to get any better.
Superb!foo said:zArk, have you got WTC tourettes?
editor said:Superb!
I think it may be time to show zArk the door as he seems stuck in some strange, endless cycle of conspiraloonery and I suspect things aren't going to get any better.
and blowing up big buildings,stealing the gold and worshiping the owl gods.norbury said:Music and Dancing
You're just posting up the same fact-free fruitloop shit and repeating yourself endlessly like some weird mantra.zArk said:???????
editor said:You're just posting up the same fact-free fruitloop shit and repeating yourself endlessly like some weird mantra.
It's dull, it's boring and not what these boards were set up for.
We've already 'done' 9/11. About a million fucking times, in fact.
editor said:We've already 'done' 9/11. About a million fucking times, in fact.
xes said:zArK,if I were you,I'd give it a rest.
You may not have bought the topic of 911 up,but you did spout a load of funny,conspiracy drivvel about it.
Please,for your own sake,stop with the CT.
zArk said:i've got the most amazing video on bittorrent called
"911 Eyewitness"
excellent quality
worth 1hr 40mins of anyones time
KeyboardJockey said:There is a Viz cartoon just for gullible fruitloops like you -- its called Grassy Knollington except that 99.99% of conspiraloon nonsense is just that - nonsense.
Grassy Knollington
zArk said:9/11 WTC 1,2, 7
1. there were explosives in WTC 1,2 and 7
2. the buildings were brrought down by controlled demolition
3. the FAA, NORAD and the pentagon were conducting exercise drills that morning which directly affected NORADS response to the hijackings
4. the hijackers were government agents part of the exercise
5. not only was it an attack to push the US into global war [money money money] but it was also a bank robbery of billions of dollars of gold from WTC and a major distraction from the theft of $3.3 trillion dollars from the pentagon 1999-2000
Flashman said:Like a recently disinfected shit-house, you’re clean round the bend.
If your 'position' is repeatedly posting up your five point fantasy of fact-free fruitloopery, then your position here is undefendable.zArk said:so, great, i am now in a quandry. do i argue and defend my position with the likely hood of being kicked because i engage the issue that admin has told me not to
Is this some kind of delusional US self help meme?zArk said:i am amazing and dont deserve this situation.
zArk said:i am amazing and dont deserve this situation.
zArk said:i am amazing and dont deserve this situation.
William of Walworth said:but a serious reaercher into those would do best to avoid thoroughly compromised sources such as prisonplanet, "911research" or similar.
Do you argue with people in real life by throwing a great pile of books at them?zArk said:<link-a-thon snipped>
Nor an aeroplaneeditor said:Do you argue with people in real life by throwing a great pile of books at them?
There is no point, they will be exactly like all the other CT shite - badly done, no real facts, and based on paranoid delusion.zArk said:you havent even read the articles or watched the cynthia mckinney video, have you?
For the last time. Either present a condensed, coherent argument that isn't made up of nothing more than a hotchpotch of random links or give it up.zArk said:you havent even read the articles or watched the cynthia mckinney video, have you?
i refer you to this
editor said:Do you argue with people in real life by throwing a great pile of books at them?
This isn't debate or discussion. It's a waste of fucking time.
What are you on about?s.norbury said:Nor an aeroplane
editor said:For the last time. Either present a condensed, coherent argument that isn't made up of nothing more than a hotchpotch of random links or give it up.
Expecting people to trawl through endless videos, dubious sites and random articles to get some idea of whatever it is you're banging on about is not acceptable.
So stop it, please.
al quaida's arguments with the us govt led to aeroplanes being flown into economic and military targetseditor said:What are you on about?