Roy Castle was in the Peter Cushing Doctor Who films.
They were going to but it appears to have stalled as I can't find any mention of it online. I have a DVD of the first series - it is fitfully entertaining.i wonder if they are ever going to bring back Blake's 7?
TV budgets are not quite there yet and it's also one thing to have a CG actor appear in a brief cameo or in a leading role in a series, where the limitations will quickly become obvious. Also just because Burton was a great actor that doesn't mean the motion-capture actor who plays him will be. It's not about conjuring ghosts.A dead actor. Richard Burton was a great actor. Is it time to cast a dead actor in the role? This could work because CGI.
So, do you maybe think Will Smith isn't interested in the post either?TV budgets are not quite there yet and it's also one thing to have a CG actor appear in a brief cameo or in a leading role in a series, where the limitations will quickly become obvious. Also just because Burton was a great actor that doesn't mean the motion-capture actor who plays him will be. It's not about conjuring ghosts.
The technology is only just cracking how to do completely photo realistic humans, so give it few more years.
They were going to but it appears to have stalled as I can't find any mention of it online. I have a DVD of the first series - it is fitfully entertaining.
Syfy developing the Blake's 7 reboot
To be honest, when I saw the news that Capaldi was leaving , I rolled my eyes & said to myself 'fuck sake not again'. It wasn't as much of a shock as with Tennant & Smith, since he'd strongly hinted during the gap year that he was more or less done, but I'm just fed up of what feels like a revolving door of actors at this stage.
It's put a dampener on my excitement for Capaldi's next series for sure, & at this point I couldn't care less who the next actor is or what the next showrunner is going to do. I'll be honest I felt that way before Capaldi announced he was leaving, Chibnall's appointment as the next showrunner didn't exactly fill me with excitement. I feel that the show is on it's last legs, like in the mid-to-late-eighties where it was swapping out actors & producers left, right & centre, hoping somehow this will improve matters.
Although I highly doubt it, if the BBC really have forced Capaldi's hand in some misguided attempt to recapture the glory days of Tennant & RTD then they are in for a rude awakening.
This pretty much hits the spot for me. And in fact it almost doesn't matter who is cast, as long as they are a decent actor and can bring a new interpretation to the role. It's more about what the series has become. As somebody pointed out earlier, it could be an intelligent and entertaining British sci-fi drama, but it's become a rather mawkish BBC Worldwide brand aimed at sucking in the young and impressionable into a deep character-led emotional narrative (alongside the insanely and needlessly complex series-long story arcs).Capaldi was well cast but let down by increasingly lazy/smart-arse plots, as others have said. It's really very frustrating: it's not as if it was just shit, and could be dismissed. I think Moffat has interesting ideas, enough so that you can usually see how good an episode could have been if it had been better thought through and executed, and less time was spent on the emotional life of the companion.
No, for me it would be weirdSean pertwee
I'd hate that. For some reason I like Fielding, but just not in anything.There's whispers of it being Noel Fielding
Yup. Kids are notoriously crap at judging the age of adults.Capaldi tips Frances de la Tour <random tabloid link>. She'd be pretty good I reckon... 'insiders' are saying they want a more youthful doctor though. To appeal to children... Thing is, when you're 12 or under, do you really associate better with a bloke in his late 30s than someone in their 70s (plays younger)? They're both fundamentally 'adults'. Strikes me as making looking for scapegoats for the failings of the executive production team.
That will not happen.There's whispers of it being Noel Fielding
Tennant lasted 5 years, Smith and Capaldi three years each - that's pretty typical of actors in the role. It's no more of a revolving door than it ever has been.what feels like a revolving door of actors at this stage.
Charlie Chuck!Off the top of my head I can't really think of anyone, man or woman, who I can imagine being the Doctor and pulling it off really well.
According to IMDB, Tennant was in 58 episodes and Smith in 56. Capaldi has been in 45 (although that includes one in which he wasn't the doctor). I guess once Capaldi does another season, he'll end up equivalent to the other two, more or less.Tennant lasted 5 years, Smith and Capaldi three years each - that's pretty typical of actors in the role. It's no more of a revolving door than it ever has been.
I bet a lot of those are flashbacks from later series. He probably only made 12 or so in his series.Eccleston was only in 20 episodes, fwiw.
Episodes were only half as long in the old daysAccording to IMDB, Tennant was in 58 episodes and Smith in 56. Capaldi has been in 45 (although that includes one in which he wasn't the doctor). I guess once Capaldi does another season, he'll end up equivalent to the other two, more or less.
Eccleston was only in 20 episodes, fwiw.
Of the old Who, it's interesting to note that whilst Sylvester McCoy was in just 42 and Colin Baker fewer, the rest massively eclipse the new Whos. Peter Davidson was in 70 and Hurtnell, Troughton, Pertwee and Tom Baker all well over 100 apiece.
I'd like to know more about wood burners and the wood people are supposed to burn in them but don't.To kabbes I have a dear friend who does that. I've known him for years and I love him, but he begins all his worst stories with "it's interesting to note...".
Last time it was about wood burners and the wood people are supposed to burn in them but don't.
Would be like the McCoy years again i.e. Crap.There's whispers of it being Noel Fielding