Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Can someone give me a link that helps me to prove the the Freeman on the land bullshit is nonsense.

I believe E17's Brian Harvey is FotL activist. He's a man who's had a few problems so I don't wish him ill.
 
Sorry folks, I didn't mean to stir up the shit with my post. I now have the answer to my question in a brief and concise form. It is an entry on Wikipedia that dismissed the whole phenomenon in a few sentences. If you look up "Freeman on the land" on Wikepedia the answer is there, complete with origin and history of the whole sad business.

I only asked the question because a friend of mine who should have known better started talking to me about the topic in a way that suggested he had fallen for it. The Wikipedia link should sort him out in short order.
 
I used to deal with a bloke who was into this freeman stuff - he said we couldn't evict him when he was in rent arrears as he was a freeman:hmm: we didn't in the end because he somehow convinced Housing Benefit to backdate a claim and it cleared the arrears:hmm: he also kept going on about him being an Esquire and that he had ancient rights that could not be over ruled in court, I was looking forward to him explaining these ancient rights in court but it never got that far:(
 
The Freeman of Oxford (more specifically Wolvercote) were given rights to graze their livestock on Port Meadow, as a thank you from King Alfred as they protected the land from invading Danes. These rights are enshrined in the Doomsday book.

The rights are still exercised by the commoners of Wolvercote. As a freeman you have grazing rights for horses and ponies on the meadow (there's also happy cows grazing, but these are owned by Binsey Farm).

You needed to have registered your rights and your animal with the council - and once a year on a variable date the animals are rounded up and animals grazing without rights are dealt with (somehow!).
 
Just remembering more stuff about him - he claimed he was an advocate of the kingdom of heaven on earth , claimed the law of the land did not apply to him . I think he had a rich father who didn't want him to live with him but helped him out financially :hmm:
Did he believe that Court and the Judge are working under Oleron Law which is controlled by the Rule and Code of The Crown Templar commanded at the very top by the Knights of Malta since the destruction of the Templars in the 14th Century. Everyone must be made aware of the Magna Carta of 1215 and the English Bill of Rights of 1689! It was the Magna Carta coming out in 1215 which handed this Kingdom over from the Monarch (Moon Arch [Bridge]) to the Knights Templar as the Magna Carta was a breach of contract between the Pope (Pontifex Maximus [BRIDGE BUILDER]) ruling the World through his Temporal Power and the Monarch?
 
Did he believe that Court and the Judge are working under Oleron Law which is controlled by the Rule and Code of The Crown Templar commanded at the very top by the Knights of Malta since the destruction of the Templars in the 14th Century. Everyone must be made aware of the Magna Carta of 1215 and the English Bill of Rights of 1689! It was the Magna Carta coming out in 1215 which handed this Kingdom over from the Monarch (Moon Arch [Bridge]) to the Knights Templar as the Magna Carta was a breach of contract between the Pope (Pontifex Maximus [BRIDGE BUILDER]) ruling the World through his Temporal Power and the Monarch?
I'd guess Yes to that
 
Did he believe that Court and the Judge are working under Oleron Law which is controlled by the Rule and Code of The Crown Templar commanded at the very top by the Knights of Malta since the destruction of the Templars in the 14th Century. Everyone must be made aware of the Magna Carta of 1215 and the English Bill of Rights of 1689! It was the Magna Carta coming out in 1215 which handed this Kingdom over from the Monarch (Moon Arch [Bridge]) to the Knights Templar as the Magna Carta was a breach of contract between the Pope (Pontifex Maximus [BRIDGE BUILDER]) ruling the World through his Temporal Power and the Monarch?

I've heard the Magna Carta stuff before but not the Templar bit. So basically this ancient mystic legal power that can't be denied came through them? You'd have thought if it can't stop you being burned at the stake it's not going to be much use for your speeding ticket tbh.
 
Living in a valley with a lot of hippies, the Freeman stuff and associated bollocks rears its head every couple of years, seems to go in waves. Lots of vaguely anti-establishment people easily fall for it, and often local venues / groups end up publicising meetings about it not realising the danger of it.

Latest serious case I came across recently was a guy I met who claimed to have had a £25,000 debt removed by following the magic formula. When questioning him on it it seemed that a lot of this was perfectly sensible (sending letters in a certain form to prevent telephone harrassment, for instance, that are probably also used by legit debt advice people). It seems to me that the 'successes' are either due to none-FOTL legal arguments or the bank etc just deciding it's not worth the hassle of fighting some fruitbat.
 
I've heard the Magna Carta stuff before but not the Templar bit. So basically this ancient mystic legal power that can't be denied came through them? You'd have thought if it can't stop you being burned at the stake it's not going to be much use for your speeding ticket tbh.

Breivik was a Templar fancier. This is bad news.
 
He was tolerable when he wasn't peddling quack cures, or playing the victim because people weren't sucking up his nonsense wholesale.
Although he wasn't above using a sexist insult when he felt like it, especially when caught out.

Good times.
 
Back
Top Bottom