Funky_monks
Neo-Rustic
Also re: the poor - meat substitutes are much more expensive than yer actual meat.
It was a drive-by dig, then. You insult me then fuck off?
You're adding a cultural dimension.Also re: the poor - meat substitutes are much more expensive than yer actual meat.
You're adding a cultural dimension.
Neither meat, nor their imitations are necessary in the diet...
I haven't had the first for over 40 years and I've hardly ever eaten anything seriously pretending to be meat - give me nut cutlets any day.
And as it happens Aldi do some very tasty fake sausages for 1.25 for 6 - and though I haven't looked closely at the ingredients, the (soy) protein per 100kcals is excellent ...
Researchers compared meat and plant-based products within strict parameters. All items were the lowest priced options and vegan alternatives matched their animal counterparts in terms of portion size.
In total, 36 products were compared. ProVeg acknowledges that the differences between supermarket chain ranges remain large, with identifiably different target consumers. However, overall findings confirm that animal meat has become more expensive than vegan meat across the board.
In February, plant-based burgers were found to be 56 cents per kilo more costly than meat alternatives. Last month they came in at 78 cents per kilo cheaper.
Similarly, vegan chicken pieces were more expensive, by an average of €1.16 per kilo, than animal varieties. Now, they are 37 cents cheaper.
Previously, plant-based mince was 29 cents per kilo more expensive than meat. Last month it came in at €1.36 less per kilo.
Oxford University states that the misunderstanding often stems from comparing conventional meat to specialist substitutes or surviving on takeaways.
The institution conducted research that found vegan and vegetarian diets are the most cost-effective options in high-income countries.
“We think the fact that vegan, vegetarian, and flexitarian diets can save you a lot of money is going to surprise people,” Dr. Marco Springmann, a researcher at Oxford University, said in a statement.
Variants of vegetarian and vegan dietary patterns were generally most affordable, and pescatarian diets were least affordable.
All you need is veggies and beans...The worry with some of these meat substitutes is the nutritional element. Meat gets a lot of bad press for causing cancer, etc, but a piece of good fresh meat is packed full of all kinds of nutrients. A piece of meat is a one-stop-shop for a great number of things, easy to prepare and easy to get the kids to eat.
But that's not the topic of the thread, is it?You're adding a cultural dimension.
Neither meat, nor their imitations are necessary in the diet...
I haven't had the first for over 40 years and I've hardly ever eaten anything seriously pretending to be meat - give me nut cutlets any day.
And as it happens Aldi do some very tasty fake sausages for 1.25 for 6 - and though I haven't looked closely at the ingredients, the (soy) protein per 100kcals is excellent ...
quelle surpriseAlso; carbohydrate in any form are not necessary in the diet, they are the only macronutrient we can live without eating.
Did you miss the bit underneath that?quelle surprise
Also, we've discussed insect protein (not negatively, as it goes) and I don't see anything to apologise for by supporting the regeneration of depleted soils as part of agricultural practice. The farm at Newcastle Uni is going entirely regen and I think the RAU have just invested millions in a centre to look at sustainable food production.Anyway I will iggy this thread again and leave it to the grass-fed / bone broth / keto / raw carnivores / regenerative agriculture apologists...
Have we had "the NWO wants us to eat insects" yet ?
Why the need to create a false caricature of the positions of people posting here rather than engage with what is actually said. You're not the only one doing this. Editor does it, as does Ddraig. Why?Anyway I will iggy this thread again and leave it to the grass-fed / bone broth / keto / raw carnivores / regenerative agriculture apologists...
Have we had "the NWO wants us to eat insects" yet ?
I can think of a few, off the top of my head, like......Why the need to create a false caricature of the positions of people posting here rather than engage with what is actually said. You're not the only one doing this. Editor does it, as does Ddraig. Why?
I read what you post with interest tbh FM, I may have missed some of your earlier contributions as I've dipped in and out, but yes I think some vegetable folk deliberately choose to ignore what's posted on this thread if it doesn't go down with their 1985 Smiths T-shirt.It's been happening all the way through, right at the beginning, I talked about how agriculture needed to change and went on to particularly discuss pig and poultry in relation to this.
I don't think anything I've written has actually been read.
Instead we have "Teh MeAt InDustReeez" as if its some conglomerate of a few mega corps and an utter failure to acknowledge that the massive meat processors are often the exact people developing those highly processed meat substitutes and therefore they are both "evil" and "our saviours" simultaneously.
There's also been a deliberate failure to even consider how crops and livestock are linked and how we are to feed a massive population sustainably and affordability, the latter being of primary concern to Agricultural scientists.
Thanks, I didn't mean you, I was aiming it more at some of the people who profess to be some sort of expert on sustainable food production having read The Guardian and......er Plant Based News...I read what you post with interest tbh FM, I may have missed some of your earlier contributions as I've dipped in and out, but yes I think some vegetable folk deliberately choose to ignore what's posted on this thread if it doesn't go down with their 1985 Smiths T-shirt.
You'll have trouble getting piss out of Linda at this point. Her ashes were spread on Macca's farm in 1998.I made some nice soup today, then saw this thread, then wondered:
"Is anyone making plant-based bones, marrow, gristle, connective tissue, tendon etc. What about plant-based liver, brains and offal?"
I mean flesh is all very well, but these other meat parts are often tastier. I look forward to plant -based kidney, with a plant -based very faint taste of piss. I hope Linda McCartney can manage that.
Oh, lots of personal questions as if what I think matters in the grand scheme of things!So do you think that everyone should go vegan Ed or are some animal products acceptable?
If the meat industry is so frightful is it your premise that if you can go vegan you should? Or are the by products of the meat industry acceptable to your ethics?
Oh, lots of personal questions as if what I think matters in the grand scheme of things!
Getting that vegan vibe already.But seeing as you've asked, I'd love it if everyone went veggie/vegan or at the very least dramatically reduced their intake of meat, I find the meat industry fucking disgusting and hideously cruel, I've no idea what your 'by-products/ethics' question is about, and just in case you're interested, I've had an entirely vegan diet for the last three weeks and feel pretty good about it.
See above.And now that I've answered all your questions, kindly reveal your Big Point.
So it's back to the tedious personal stuff again and this ridiculous argument. Sigh.Hardly personal
Getting that vegan vibe already.
I just find it astounding that someone who is so vitriolic about the meat industry (and associated by products) would not have taken vegan shilling earlier.
I was just wondering what level of hypocrisy I was witnessing.
See above.
Not in "Vegans weekly" so not evidence.Re: Meat & Dairy and health:
"Dairy consumption was associated with lower risk of mortality and major cardiovascular disease events in a diverse multinational cohort."
2 servings of dairy a day associated with 32% lower cardiac events and 25% lower all cause mortality
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673618318129
"Here, we conducted a systematic review and implemented a meta-regression ......... to evaluate the relationships between unprocessed red meat consumption and six potential health outcomes. We found weak evidence of association between unprocessed red meat consumption and colorectal cancer, breast cancer, type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. Moreover, we found no evidence of an association between unprocessed red meat and ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke"
Health effects associated with consumption of unprocessed red meat: a Burden of Proof study - Nature Medicine
editor please don’t ban this cock. That’s clearly what he wants.editor u have been made to look a right cock in this thread.
I actually am a veggie but you are an absolute disgrace by pulling up random articles that you refuse to discuss you do yourself or any cause a lack of favours
Well done butcher and funky monks for informative discourse.
editor please don’t ban this cock. That’s clearly what he wants.