WouldBe
Dislicksick
I always took a packed lunch.I've had school dinners before
I always took a packed lunch.I've had school dinners before
Everyone else had dinner money so we did too, think my mum didn't want me to feel I was differen. Even more so than at that school than at the private school she didnt want me to go to on scholarship cos I could be the poor kid. Didn't entirely get that but frankly that particular school has turned out some horrendous examples of human beings and I am happy as being me as I have turned out, as a result of my life without someone fucking about with it, even if it is me.I always took a packed lunch.
from here
Can we stomach the latest emerging food innovations?
Our growing appetite for novel food tech - from lab grown meat to nano-packaging.www.bbc.co.ukPrint a burger
A handful of firms are now working on 3D printers that could construct this dinner while you wait, by printing thousands of pre-programmed, sliver-thin layers, stacked on top of each other.
The "ink" used is your food in paste format: printers that can design bespoke pancakes, ice cream and confectionery are already popular in some high-end supermarkets.
However, Ms Almy says companies are now testing the water with much more sophisticated versions. 3D bio-printing can print cells and materials together to create a more complex structured product, like a marbled beef steak.
Sorry for literally responding to the OP rather than some other proposition that was in your head.
Can I trade my unused air miles for steak?
View attachment 295510
The 'clearing rainforests to make soy mince' thing is utter horseshit and nobody who comes out with it does so in good faith.
If you want to keep eating meat that's fine, but you can't whatabout your way around the fact that doing so has a disproportionate impact on land and water use and climate change.
That said, market forces will present some more alternatives. I know but this whole thing is about market forces.
a new word for me, but not for Urban !No, because turning ecological destruction into a fungible commodity is the exact opposite of a solution to the problems we face.
someone in a chatroom yesterday was talking about 3D printed meat - fat, muscle, tubes ...
Surely there are other alternatives for livestock than feeding them soy and clearing forests to grow it.View attachment 295510
The 'clearing rainforests to make soy mince' thing is utter horseshit and nobody who comes out with it does so in good faith.
If you want to keep eating meat that's fine, but you can't whatabout your way around the fact that doing so has a disproportionate impact on land and water use and climate change.
No, at this level of meat production there is no alternative.Surely there are other alternatives for livestock than feeding them soy and clearing forests to grow it.
Plants raised for human consumption will also need space to grow and given the relative lack of nutritional density/calories we will need a lot of space for that.
No, at this level of meat production there is no alternative.
As we've already established animals can be grazed on land that's unsuitable for growing crops for human consumption., as we've already established, raising animals requires lots of land to be used to grow plants for them anyway.
Don't being so dense.
As we've already established animals can be grazed on land that's unsuitable for growing crops for human consumption.
Yeah, pasture. I know. What % of animals eaten worldwide (and not in some fantasy pastoral North of England/Ireland) are raised on such land?As we've already established animals can be grazed on land that's unsuitable for growing crops for human consumption.
It's the inevitable consequence of having "high quality meat" only - all ethical and pastoral and friendly smiling farmers with small herds... ops! That's super expensive now. Only the super rich can afford it. ByeThis alone would not produce the quantities of meat people currently eat in wealthy countries. Not even close
I don't think this is true at all, even if I ignore your inability to insult me properlyNo, at this level of meat production there is no alternative.
Plants raised for human consumption are far more efficient in terms of calories provided per hectare of land use, as, as we've already established, raising animals requires lots of land to be used to grow plants for them anyway.
Don't being so dense.
I've not been convinced either way on the soya argument tbh.View attachment 295510
The 'clearing rainforests to make soy mince' thing is utter horseshit and nobody who comes out with it does so in good faith.
If you want to keep eating meat that's fine, but you can't whatabout your way around the fact that doing so has a disproportionate impact on land and water use and climate change.
There are arguments against it being grown for animal feed as they could just be fed something cheaper...
There are also issues around land use and clearance for farmland. A lot of deforested land is used for cattle and Soy at different times.
So the level of meat consumption can be addressed, but not in the nonsensical way prescribed that advocated people eat something like 20g meat a day since no one is going to bother doing that, which I suspect is the real point of saying something like that.This alone would not produce the quantities of meat people currently eat in wealthy countries. Not even close
So it's the fault of the vegans that factory farming can't be stopped? Seriously. Take a look at the bullshit you're posting.I think it's entirely dependent on the individual. But I don't feel morally compelled to eat no meat and I don't believe there is a good environmental argument for it either. Addressing factory farming is one area of concern where all can agree, but unfortunately given the nature of the vegan position that won't happen
I have no doubt that removing cattle from the situation would reduce the problem but how much and how significantly without looking at the issues around soy. As popular as soy is among many of those who currently don't eat meat I can only see it getting more popular if there are less cattle. If the crop is still economically viable without the animal feed component deforestation may continue to be a serious issue.Used for cattle and cattle feed then. Or, to put it another way, used for cattle.
What kind of weird bullshit nonsense is this?I thought this thread was about a “post-meat future”, not just some rich Western folks buying veggie sausages made with soya protein from previously-forested Brazilian land?
The bizarre excuses and blame shifting just keep on coming!It will just go underground with poaching and illegal animal rearing and of course there won't be any checks on the welfare of the animals or oversight of the slaughter because you won't know where it's happening.
I'm sure many do but where money can be made by investing in a more calorific or nutritious food or some other way of boosting growth to get a bigger or quicker return I'm sure plenty take that option.It's nice that you think animals aren't already being fed the cheapest stuff farmers can get away with but I don't think it has much basis in reality.
It's really becoming embarrassing to read the blatant lies and mistruths being posted by the meat fans in this thread.View attachment 295510
The 'clearing rainforests to make soy mince' thing is utter horseshit and nobody who comes out with it does so in good faith.
If you want to keep eating meat that's fine, but you can't whatabout your way around the fact that doing so has a disproportionate impact on land and water use and climate change.
Anyone know which is best for baking?As an aside, it's interesting to see the explosive growth of non-dairy milk. The usual suspects will whine about its supposed awful taste or manufacture ludicrous fantasy stories about how its environmental impact is somehow worse than dairy, but they'll be lying as usual.
From fringe to mainstream: how millions got a taste for going vegan
First, it was a fad. Now, as meat consumption falls, it’s part of everyday life … the unstoppable rise of the plant-based dietwww.theguardian.com
HTH HANDAnyone know which is best for baking?