Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Bye bye MEAT! How will the post-meat future look?

How reluctant are you to give up your meat habit?


  • Total voters
    196
Status
Not open for further replies.
Another dairy 'farm' torture dungeon. The sooner this abominable industry is wiped off the face of the earth of the better.

 

Dairy is inherently cruel. Turning cows into milking and breeding machines and stealing their babies is obviously cruel and it’s not surprising there are so many exposes of further brutality in the dairy industry, dairy farmers treat ‘their’ cows like expendable garbage with no inherent worth, of course they’ll frequently lash out at them.

Why are nutritional claims about meat ‘back to the topic at hand’? It’s no more relevant to the thread than what I posted.
 
Dairy is inherently cruel. Turning cows into milking and breeding machines and stealing their babies is obviously cruel and it’s not surprising there are so many exposes of further brutality in the dairy industry, dairy farmers treat ‘their’ cows like expendable garbage with no inherent worth, of course they’ll frequently lash out at them.

Why are nutritional claims about meat ‘back to the topic at hand’? It’s no more relevant to the thread than what I posted.
Because its about meat and the environment - nutritional factors are good reason to keep producing it.

If conditions in dairying are as commonplace as your expose, it wouldn't be news, or indeed an expose of any kind. You could walk onto any dairy farm and it would be like that. But, it isn't, and farmers don't generally treat their animals as you describe. You, by your own admission have never been on any dairy farms. I've been on loads. You choose to use openly anti meat sources to get your information on dairying and yet you can't see how they might possibly have a bias. You could do something like go to an open farm sunday and have a look, its not like they are all kept in secret.

Trying to paint everyone who keeps animals in the same category as those who abuse them is disingenuous.

Do you think that all people should be banned from keeping dogs because some people are cruel to them?
 
Dairy is inherently cruel.
You think so, for the reasons you give. But rightly or wrongly, most diary farmers don't think what they are doing is inherently cruel. And they do care about their animals. I went to school with quite a few kids from local farms. I've grown up with something of a prejudice against farmers tbh. They can often be selfish arseholes ime. And they're certainly unsentimental about their animals. But to say they don't care about the animals as a generalisation or routinely inflict needless cruelty is just wrong. Only bad farmers do that.
 
Jeff could always start a Bye Bye Milk thread, I am sure people will have lots of well informed opinions to express (no pun intended).
The market size of the Non-Dairy Milk Production industry in the UK has grown 14.2% per year on average between 2017 and 2022 so milk is unlikely to vanish, but there's clearly a lot of people preferring cruelty free alternatives. Which is great, no?
 
Here's some positive news for people who care about climate change:

The world’s most-developed nations will be told to curb their excessive appetite for meat as part of the first comprehensive plan to bring the global agrifood industry into line with the Paris climate agreement.

The global food systems’ road map to 1.5C is expected to be published by the United Nations’ Food & Agriculture Organization during the COP28 summit next month. Nations that over-consume meat will be advised to limit their intake, while developing countries — where under-consumption of meat adds to a prevalent nutrition challenge — will need to improve their livestock farming, according to the FAO.

 
Here's some positive news for people who care about climate change:



Doesn't that effectively say that developing countries should eat more meat? :hmm:

So you're just 'moving' the climate problem to poorer countries. :hmm:
 
Doesn't that effectively say that developing countries should eat more meat? :hmm:

So you're just 'moving' the climate problem to poorer countries. :hmm:
Try reading it properly and understand how much the west - and most noticeably Americans - are consuming.
 
Try reading it properly and understand how much the west - and most noticeably Americans - are consuming.
I know how much the west consumes, it's been mentioned on here often enough. But it definitely says developing countries should be eating more meat.
 
I know how much the west consumes, it's been mentioned on here often enough. But it definitely says developing countries should be eating more meat.
It's really not worth engaging with you. It clearly means that the planet should CONSUME LESS MEAT OVERALL.
 
The simple reality:


And:

One-third of global greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to food, with meat and dairy accounting for the lion’s share of it but providing just 18 percent of the world’s calories. Meat and dairy production are also leading causes of other environmental ills, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, pandemic risk, and water pollution. Dairy production alone emits more greenhouse gases than global aviation. Plant-based foods typically have a much smaller carbon footprint, and require far less land and water.
As greenhouse gas emissions from animal agriculture have become increasingly difficult to ignore, global policymakers now stand at a fork in the road on how to address them. Numerous environmental scientists, including some who’ve published studies on the matter for the UN, have called on wealthy countries to cut back on meat and eat more plant-based meals — a sure way to slash agricultural emissions, but politically challenging.

Down another path lies the more politically palatable, yet far less effective, approach of continuing to eat record amounts of meat in the West while deploying a host of technologies and farming practices, each of which can only marginally shave off livestock emissions.

The world needs a mix of both approaches, but policymakers, out of political expediency and corporate capture, are barreling down the second path, a choice they’ll likely come to regret as climate change intensifies.

“We have only one planet, and we’re not going to be able to feed everyone with the diet of the Europeans,” said Raphael Podselver, director of UN affairs for the nonprofit ProVeg International.

 
The meat lobby is every bit as evil as the tobacco lobby, but this time it's the planet getting screwed over:

Powerful meat corporations are planning to push false claims that meat is “sustainable nutrition” at COP28, an international environmental conference that meets yearly to establish a global response to the climate crisis.

The meat lobbyists’ pro-meat communications strategy is contradicted by research showing that 57 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions attributed to food production are generated by meat, aquaculture, dairy and eggs.

“It’s no surprise that the meat industry — which is as shameless in its insatiable quest for profits as the tobacco industry — is pulling out all the stops in an attempt to dupe decisionmakers,” Delcianna J. Winders, Animal Law and Policy Institute Director at Vermont Law and Graduate School, told Truthout.

 
For "simple reality", read "failing to understand a complex problem", using that well known scientific publication "Vox" as supporting evidence.

Jesus.

To add: Its bad that scientists working in the livestock sector are at COP, but absolutely fine that lobbying goes on from industrial processors making highly processed slop "meat substitutes". The "good capitalists" vs "the bad capitalists" again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom