skyscraper101
0891 50 50 50
Has anyone asked the cats what they think about being put on a vegan diet?
8 out of 10 cats prefer it.
Has anyone asked the cats what they think about being put on a vegan diet?
another alternative is to give cats red bull to drink
8 out of 10 cats prefer it.
They are usually very disappointed when the mouse dies. My cat used to flick the dead mouse for a while trying to get it to do something. And yeah, he wouldn't always eat any of it.I think they play with them for fun and then eventually the mice die. They don’t often, in my experience, eat them afterwards, just enjoy the game, where killing doesn’t always seem to be their main objective.
See how cruel it is forcing outdoor cats into a mouse-based dietThey are usually very disappointed when the mouse dies. My cat used to flick the dead mouse for a while trying to get it to do something. And yeah, he wouldn't always eat any of it.
I think they play with them for fun and then eventually the mice die. They don’t often, in my experience, eat them afterwards, just enjoy the game, where killing doesn’t always seem to be their main objective.
They're bringing you a nice present.In my experience they mostly bring the fuckers into the house alive and then leave them there for someone else to deal with.
Nah. Reserving 'fun' to humans only is human exceptionalism. You don't think the ways we have fun have their origins in our evolutionary past? Of course they do. And we share exactly the same fun-rewarding biochemistry as other animals, too.They "play" with their prey as a strategy to tire it out and reduce risk of injury to themselves.
And if they don't eat it, its because they aren't hungry, because they've been fed catfood.
It's adaptive behaviour left over from living in the wild. Saying it's for "fun" is anthropomorphising.
There's loads of stuff we do which has origins in our evolutionary past but we'd only describe some of it as "fun". You can ask a human if they are having fun doing something but not a cat.Nah. Reserving 'fun' to humans only is human exceptionalism. You don't think the ways we have fun have their origins in our evolutionary past? Of course they do. And we share exactly the same fun-rewarding biochemistry as other animals, too.
So what? You also can't ask a cat if it is in pain. Doesn't mean it doesn't experience pain.You can ask a human if they are having fun doing something but not a cat.
There's loads of stuff we do which has origins in our evolutionary past but we'd only describe some of it as "fun". You can ask a human if they are having fun doing something but not a cat.
They "play" with their prey as a strategy to tire it out and reduce risk of injury to themselves.
And if they don't eat it, its because they aren't hungry, because they've been fed catfood.
It's adaptive behaviour left over from living in the wild. Saying it's for "fun" is anthropomorphising.
Nah. Reserving 'fun' to humans only is human exceptionalism. You don't think the ways we have fun have their origins in our evolutionary past? Of course they do. And we share exactly the same fun-rewarding biochemistry as other animals, too.
My point is more to do with in what way it's useful to talk about the behaviour of playing with prey as "fun". It's useful to identify an animal as experiencing "pain" if you want to avoid it having this experience.So what? You also can't ask a cat if it is in pain. Doesn't mean it doesn't experience pain.
My sister's cat got bored after a mouse it was 'playing' with in the garden became lifeless and returned to the house. A while later, realising the cat had gone, the mouse leapt up and ran off!They are usually very disappointed when the mouse dies. My cat used to flick the dead mouse for a while trying to get it to do something. And yeah, he wouldn't always eat any of it.
I think there's a particular issue with words like "fun" because (I would say) fun means more than simply an activity from which some kind of pleasure reward is gained ... it implies something judged to be essentially harmless, or at least something that for the perpetrator is untinged with moral concerns or doubts. And for those reasons I'd say is a human specific word.Anthropomorphising other animals is of course a danger. But attributing fun to them isn't necessarily anthropomorphising. The opposite trap also exists and is often fallen into - thinking that somehow human behaviours are special and there's a sharp divide between us and other animals. I would suggest that where 'fun' is concerned, there are plenty of other animals that exhibit behaviour the shows every evidence that they're having fun. Dig deeper and you see the same internal reward systems in place that we have.
The danger in failing to recognise this is that you misunderstand both the other animal and our evolved nature.
I think you're making the word 'fun' do a lot of heavy lifting there.
Cats kill for the fun of it, my daughter's cat likes to catch mice alive and release them in the kitchen where they can't escape without getting past it. It likes to torment them for a bit before killing them.
The only bit I would dispute, or seek to qualify, is the bit about tormenting the mouse. It surely is tormenting the mouse, but I very much doubt the cat has the intention to torment it. The cat doesn't give a shit if the mouse is tormented or not.As ever there's context. Would you agree that the following statement is athropomorphising?
A lot of vegetarians and vegans have rescue cats to be fair.Mad really - Domesticated cats are there because humans breed them and so, whilst the natural world can be unbelievably cruel at times, we can't really interfere with that (see: Dolphins killing porpoises for fun etc).
Cats, however, not only kill masses of wildlife inc things like songbirds (most of which are protected) they also seemingly enjoy torturing their prey. So; by buying a cat, you are effectively sentencing thousands of animals to a lengthy, horrific, tortuous death (unless you keep it indoors). It is also, as mentioned an obligate carnivore.
If you are a vegan or vegetarian who thinks killing animals for food or sport is immoral, I can't for the life of me see how it's compatible with your code of ethics to purchase a animal that will torture animals on your behalf. I can't see how you could be against hunting with dogs, whilst simultaneously have an outdoor cat, both are human interferences that cause suffering (cats probably more so than hunting dogs, if you exclude foxhunting).
Why not just not have a bloody cat in the first place?
That looks a LOT like my daughter's cat especially the expression, I'm sure teuchter will accuse me of anthropomorphising (and I probably am) but it always amazes me how wide a range of facial expressions cats are capable of.
You can also synthesise taurine. The point was that it would need to be added to any vegetable based cat food for it to be healthy.Just having a quick google, taurine can be obtained from seaweed.
So if cats are fed a vegan diet, with seaweed mixed in, you may be good if there are no other nutritional items that can only be obtained from meat. Still, there may be another chemical in seaweed that is toxic to cats as cats seem to be susceptible to a lot of foods we think are fine.
Cats do what cats want to do. If they don't like it, they'll let you know, sure enough.Has anyone asked the cats what they think about being put on a vegan diet?
Yeah they wouldn't keep doing something if they didn't like it.I think you would be hard-pressed to say this dog is not having fun.
Is that any guarantee they’ll get what they want? It will basically become a battle of wills against their determined owners, who will dismiss any protestations, revenge poos, and half eaten dishes as an initial unhappiness to the cat’s diet that will wear off in a few days or weeks at most as the cat gets used to the new, only food now available to them.Cats do what cats want to do. If they don't like it, they'll let you know, sure enough.