One pig's life to me is infinitely more valuable than all of the low-life mendacious vermin who have managerial or senior roles in this barbaric corporation...
Great animal rights demo outside the UK HQ of one of the world's leading pig torture corporations:
Glad that the Little Eichmann scum in their corporate offices may for once in the wretched lives have felt the slightest bit of accountability for their profiteering in the mass murder and extreme suffering of sweet, intelligent, sentient beings. One pig's life to me is infinitely more valuable than all of the low-life mendacious vermin who have managerial or senior roles in this barbaric corporation.
You've never encountered an actual real pig have you?Great animal rights demo outside the UK HQ of one of the world's leading pig torture corporations:
Glad that the Little Eichmann scum in their corporate offices may for once in the wretched lives have felt the slightest bit of accountability for their profiteering in the mass murder and extreme suffering of sweet, intelligent, sentient beings. One pig's life to me is infinitely more valuable than all of the low-life mendacious vermin who have managerial or senior roles in this barbaric corporation.
You've never encountered an actual real pig have you?
So have I when I worked as a farm labourer, nice isn't a word I would use to describe pigs. Prefer the word tasty meself. Always got a sense of satisfaction out of eating one we'd raised.I have, loads - at farm sanctuaries. They are sweethearts. Almost certainly nicer people than you.
Awesome contribution to the thread. What's your thoughts on the well documented cases of animal abuse and cruelty that have been taking place on farms across the UK?So have I when I worked as a farm labourer, nice isn't a word I would use to describe pigs. Prefer the word tasty meself. Always got a sense of satisfaction out of eating one we'd raised.
I lived and worked on farms for six years and never saw any case of torture, abuse or cruelty though I guess you might have a different definition from me. Farmers are practical people, they're in it to make a living. Livestock is valuable, they're not pets but no-one is going to torture them for fun of it why the fuck would they do that?Awesome contribution to the thread. What's your thoughts on the well documented cases of animal abuse and cruelty that have been taking place on farms across the UK?
The videos of animal torture on even medium or small farms (forget about what goes on at large meat factory farms) are easy to find. I shan't post any now.I lived and worked on farms for six years and never saw any case of torture, abuse or cruelty though I guess you might have a different definition from me. Farmers are practical people, they're in it to make a living. Livestock is valuable, they're not pets but no-one is going to torture them for fun of it why the fuck would they do that?
So have I when I worked as a farm labourer, nice isn't a word I would use to describe pigs. Prefer the word tasty meself. Always got a sense of satisfaction out of eating one we'd raised.
So you're actually denying animal abuse goes on in farms, yes? Like it doesn't exist?I lived and worked on farms for six years and never saw any case of torture, abuse or cruelty though I guess you might have a different definition from me. Farmers are practical people, they're in it to make a living. Livestock is valuable, they're not pets but no-one is going to torture them for fun of it why the fuck would they do that?
I lived and worked on farms for six years and never saw any case of torture, abuse or cruelty though I guess you might have a different definition from me. Farmers are practical people, they're in it to make a living. Livestock is valuable, they're not pets but no-one is going to torture them for fun of it why the fuck would they do that?
Expecting Plant Based News to write a balanced article about meat production is like Expecting the Angling Times to publish an article about how fishing is a tedious waste of time.obviously biased, but Plant Based news seemed to me moderate and eveidence based. They cite Michael Greger often and he backs up his claims all the time. Now whether he uses credible citations is another matter
Ive worked on them for a darn sight longer than that and nor have I, the thing is that a couple of people here choose to believe highly dubious, obviously biased sources (see: plant based news) and the odd sensationalist article in the media.
Before you even get to ethics, from a purely financial sense, abused animals aren't going to be profitable - stressed animals are more prone to disease etc.
The thing is, these boards are very intolerant of far right nonsense, unless its the kind of nonsense spouted by lunatics such as Jeff.
I would ignore him, it's probably for the best - he's been repeatedly taken to task over his mysogyny, abuse, bigotry and unhinged behavior, but he seems to get special treatment. He's just a very angry boy on the internet. Probably needs help tbf.
sure but my question is whether they back up their claims. Clearly calling yoursel fPlant Based News isn't a sign of dietary objectivityExpecting Plant Based News to write a balanced article about meat production is like Expecting the Angling Times to publish an article about how fishing is a tedious waste of time.
"far right" - lol, you utter fucking clown. I have been "repeatedly taken to task" by... you? You, a craven apologist and denialist about the systematic and routine animal abuse happening on British farms and slaughterhouses every single day - as if the views of a deluded wanker like you holds any weight at all. Twat.
See?
It's like a vegan "Rick" from the Young Ones, only with added misogyny and marginally less charm.
Except you continue to use the "rape" trope to describe natural service and AI, even after "standing heat" has been explained to you.Your claims that I'm "far right" and "misogynist" are as unsubstantiated and baseless as your fantasy views of farming and slaughterhouses.
Except you continue to use the "rape" trope to describe natural service and AI, even after "standing heat" has been explained to you.
You continue to utterly trivialise rape in this manner which is deeply misogynistic.
It's a trope which plenty of women in Agriculture (and outside it, when theyve heard it) continue to find deeply upsetting, and given that 25% of women have experienced either rape or attempted rape, your continued use of this trope is both disgusting and deeply misogynistic.
There are pros and cons to the us of GM crops and there's a discussion to be about how they are, can and should be used, but comparing farmers who plant them to rapists is offensive and absurd.
On the other hand, "livestock" farming involves the widespread interference with the sexual organs and sexual reproductivity of animals and practices like electro-ejaculation and forced artificial insemination. If any farming should be compared to sexual violence its the animal agriculture that you and Shiva are cheerleaders for.
The thread is about "eating less meat" and the reasons therefor.To add:
None of this was what the thread was about. The thread was about agriculture's role in climate change vs meat substitutes which are being marketed as better for the environment and also "good for you", and yet, certain posters cannot resist off topic screeching about something the thread was never about in the first place, again see: "Rick".
No, I didn't do that did I?Just for context, you defended Vandana Shiva comparing planting GM crops to rape. When you asked what I thought was wrong with that, I said:
(see Bye bye MEAT! How will the post-meat future look?)
That you think its perfectly fine to compare GM crop production to rape, but think it's outrageous to recognise that physically restraining cows, anally fisting them and injecting semen into their vaginas is a form of sexual violence just shows what a insincere bullshitter you are. Your remarks about the "far right" origins of veganism are moronic even by your standards, not even worthy of a rebuttal.
No, no it wasn't it was about meat substitutes being better for the environment (or not, as the case may be). It had nothing to do with the ethics of meat consumption until it was derailed by some attention seekers who didn't like well referenced arguments about the environmental aspects of agriculture and so decided to engage in some performative whataboutery.The thread is about "eating less meat" and the reasons therefor.
Horrendously cruel, unethical treatment of animals is #1 on my list of reasons to do exactly that...
I see what you are saying; and it's a fair point. However, I don't think the poll questions herein correlate to a thread theme that dryly scientific.No, no it wasn't it was about meat substitutes being better for the environment (or not, as the case may be). It had nothing to do with the ethics of meat consumption until it was derailed by some attention seekers who didn't like well referenced arguments about the environmental aspects of agriculture and so decided to engage in some performative whataboutery.
What is this?And you won't rebut the far right thing because you know the seventh day adventists continue to donate $$$ to Viva, you know I'm right about the Italian Fascists and "sacred vegetarianism".
No, I didn't do that did I?
I quoted Vandana about something else entirely, and you felt that somehow meant that I agreed with every utterance she's made - somebody else bothered to trawl through her twitter to find the GM/rape post, not me. Again, delusional.
I've explained, AI, shown how it works and how standing heat works I believe I posted a video. I've explained how offensive your trope is to lots of women and yet you double down on it again and again.
And you won't rebut the far right thing because you know the seventh day adventists continue to donate $$$ to Viva, you know I'm right about the Italian Fascists and "sacred vegetarianism".
The best thing that ever happened re: veganism is that it is now a "protected characteristic" like other religions, and Just like Christians, Muslims etc etc, Ive found most vegans to be utterly reasonable human beings. You are the Abu Hamza of Vegans.