Barking_Mad said:If you're interested in reading up to date articles, check out Newsnow
http://www.newsnow.co.uk/newsfeed/?search=Burma
Angelina wants to adopt a baby from Burma to add to her 'rainbow' family
purves grundy said:
Barking_Mad said:Hmm, I wonder what sort of things are being said by foreign governments behind the scenes and how much, if any effect this is going to have?
Everyone in Burma knows somebody in the army. I've met a few from the low-to-mid ranks, and whilst they weren't openly anti-government they would chuckle and roll eyes when we talked about something like development. And like I said, even within the top brass there are hardliners and moderates. After Khin Nyunt's downfall, however, the moderates are far less inclined to speak out.Barking_Mad said:Additionally how much of a wedge exists between the average Burmese soldier and the monks/people? You get the impression that the only way this is going to end favourably is if the military at some level turn against the top brass and refuse orders.
Shocking isn't it? It really shows the tooothlessness of that organization. And after the last failed resolution on Burma - vetoed by Russia and China, and with even non perm member South Africa voting against - I doubt another would be tabled unless the situation gets a lot worse.ymu said:Does the UN ever try to be effectual anywhere except at the margins?
Is there any prospect that the UN could bring sufficient pressure to bear on China and India? I guess there's no chance the security council will try to force China to act given that China is on it and has a veto.
Lorries equipped with loudspeakers have been seen driving through the streets of Burma's main city Rangoon warning residents not to join growing protests.
"People are not to follow, encourage or take part in these marches. Action will be taken against those who violate this order," the broadcast said.
But the monks leading the protests have vowed to continue despite the threats.
China's default diplomatic position is that it does not "interfere" in the domestic politics of other countries - one might add, especially where supplies of energy and natural resources or strategic issues are involved. Beijing is averse to lectures on human rights and democracy at home, so naturally disinclined to deliver them abroad.
But China is now faced with the fact that the high diplomatic profile that goes with greater global power exposes it to new pressures to uphold international standards, and that if the country is to continue to sell her ascent to global superpower status as unthreatening, close partnerships with unsavoury regimes can produce undesirable blowback. China's previous intransigence on Darfur melted when campaigners married the Beijing Olympic games to China's support for the Sudanese regime to produce the slogan "Genocide Olympics". China suddenly found it convenient to send an envoy to Sudan and to play a more constructive role in multilateral efforts to resolve the crisis. A similar pressure is building over Burma.
That's interesting. Israel stations soldiers at the opposite end of the country from their homes also. Israelis joke that it is to keep the nationalised bus service profitable with trips home on leave, but that's a more plausible angle.fela fan said:As for the soldiers not opening fire, disobeying orders, possible. But here in thailand, a similar country to burma, when they have opened fire in the past on thai people, the soldiers have always been 'shipped' in from upcountry, thereby avoiding the situation of soldiers killing their own neighbours.
How do they maintain so much public respect when they've been bribed not to do this on and off for so long? Or is a part of the bribery a threat of massacring civilians?fela fan said:I would say that history will record the fact that the monks brought down the evil regime.
It's certainly excellent timing - the Olympics are icing on the cake, but just as China is looking to open up and is getting deeply involved in Africa to extend its influence - fantastic!. Even as a Chinese dependency, life would be comparative heaven.fela fan said:And the international community will be seen as having done fuck all to help the poor burmese people throughout their many years of repression, and that if any outsider will be seen as having had a positive influence, it'll be china riding into the rescue at the 11th hour of burma's history.
ymu said:That's interesting. Israel stations soldiers at the opposite end of the country from their homes also. Israelis joke that it is to keep the nationalised bus service profitable with trips home on leave, but that's a more plausible angle.
Let's pray China go for a pre-olympic PR coup.
ymu said:How do they maintain so much public respect when they've been bribed not to do this on and off for so long? Or is a part of the bribery a threat of massacring civilians?
Yeah - it'll herald the next clash of empires that's been waiting to fill the vacuum too. China are our best hope of getting rid of the US. In Cold War II, the US takes the role of economic basket-case and China is the economic power-house with vastly more people. Interesting times, but the US will be crushed once it's creditors have more lucrative markets which are hostile to it.fela fan said:As for china possibly being the outside force that finally provided the longed-for outside assistance to the burmese people's cause to obtain their freedom, well, isn't it bloody amazing how strong humans attachment to face is! How so highly they view being viewed in a positive light.
And if this is the case, then the burmese people will come to view the awarding of the olympics to china as being the precursor to finally obtaining their freedom!
Watching history actually occur, it's amazing how things become inextricably linked based on no particular starting off point. Things all seem to kind of fall into place at a similar time, and when this happens, change occurs.
ymu said:Yeah - it'll herald the next clash of empires that's been waiting to fill the vacuum too. China are our best hope of getting rid of the US. In Cold War II, the US takes the role of economic basket-case and China is the economic power-house with vastly more people. Interesting times, but the US will be crushed once it's creditors have more lucrative markets which are hostile to it.
African terrorism next, is my guess.
Hmm - I thought it was on this thread - but wordsearch isn't picking up so I'll retract until I can reread.fela fan said:I'm not sure they have been bribed mate. Where did you read that?
But in both burma and thailand, both similarly majority buddhist nations, monks play a central role in people's lives. They cut right through the fabric of society and all functions that go on, weddings, funerals, receiving of food, giving of blessings, and so on. To me it often seems in reality more like a kind of animism, but either way, respect is simply accorded to monks as a matter of life itself. If you breathe, you respect monks!
purves grundy said:Following earlier events, it looks like many monks are ready to stage demonstrations - expect numbers of around 300-400, which is miniscule by most country's standards. In Burma though, this is massive.
http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=8622
The junta are shit scared of the monks. They have a following which is far greater than The Lady, but in recent years monasteries have remained silent over poverty and human rights abuses as senior abbots have been bought off by the military.
The next few days are going to be very interesting and, I fear, very bloody.
The Burma Campaign UK said its sources had reported the junta ordering 3,000 maroon monastic robes and telling soldiers to shave their heads, possibly to infiltrate the mass ranks of monks marching for an end to 45 years of unbroken military rule.
In 1988, agents provocateurs were seen stirring up the crowds, giving the military the pretext to restore order.
Some Burma experts speculate that Beijing may be quietly restraining the generals from cracking down. But silent Chinese diplomacy and familiar U.S. denunciations are not likely to be enough. What's needed is forceful multilateral action making clear that the time has come for the regime to negotiate a political settlement with the country's democrats, led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi -- coupled with explicit warnings of consequences if violence is used against peaceful protests.
The U.N. General Assembly offers a ready venue for concerted action by Asian and Western governments. Ms. Rice has said that she would like to see the group of countries that now negotiates with North Korea -- the United States, South Korea, Japan, Russia and China -- evolve into a regional security structure; if so, this would be a great moment for it to collectively address the situation in Burma. Mr. Bush should make it clear that the United States will hold China responsible if there are massacres in Rangoon -- and that the fallout could tarnish the 2008 Olympics. One way or another, Burma's rulers must get the message that a powerful international alliance stands with those who are bravely parading across the country.
Pretty much the same way Imams did in Iran before the 1979 toppling of the Shah...fela fan said:But in both burma and thailand, both similarly majority buddhist nations, monks play a central role in people's lives. They cut right through the fabric of society and all functions that go on, weddings, funerals, receiving of food, giving of blessings, and so on.