klang
klang
no such thing btwanarcho community with antisemitic conspiracy theories
no such thing btwanarcho community with antisemitic conspiracy theories
Actually I think it ended up closing cos of covid rather than cos it didn't work in normal times though.
The depressing state of venues in this country is a huge soapbox topic of mine. As many things do nowadays, it almost always comes back to scummy landlords demanding exorbitant rates and/or gentrification of city areas.The whole country lacks mid-range venues to hire at reasonable prices. And small, and large ones - It's a problem - much of the creative infrastructure of the country has disappeared, and especially over the last 10 years or so.
They have conferences and everything.Do actual flat-earthers exist?
And here's what the PRS have come up with:
PRS for Music launches Online Live Concert licence for small-scale livestreamed gigs
New portal allows easy licence purchase for those wanting to stage or host an online live concert or gig in the UK.www.prsformusic.com
Revenue | Licence cost + VAT |
---|---|
Less than £250 | £22.50 |
£251 - £500 | £45 |
£501 or more | Contact us for more info |
Charging a default £22.50 for what could be just a handful of people watching is ridiculous too - and it's been pointed out that many of these online gigs are put on for charities or to support a venue.45 quid is nearly 20% of turnover if you've taken 251 quid on your stream. It's a ridiculous sum, particularly given how hard it is for small bands to attract much of an audience online (I watched some excellent performers tonight on a free stream and there was only a handful of people tuning in).
And as for the 'just play more gigs in the UK' argument:Think of an average 4-person band with a driver. Now add their travel and hotel costs to that and compare against the amount of what you’re likely to receive for each show. It won’t take a great mathematician to work out that it not only doesn’t add up but will leave you severely out of pocket. So ‘what about selling merchandise?’ I hear you say. As a result of Brexit, bands now have to list every single bit of equipment they’re carrying over and pay upfront tax on merchandise they don’t even know they are going to sell.
And the idea of not touring but still trying to sell records to fans in Europe is now a disaster.So,” I hear you say… “why not concentrate and focus your efforts in in the UK?”
Well, in the UK, the scene is not looking that much better. There’s hardly anywhere to play or practice in the capital thanks to the practice of the developers. A lot of venues in the UK who were struggling anyway, are now in danger of shutting their doors forever thanks to the UK Government’s incompetent mishandling of the Covid crisis.
Aside from the ‘touring’ fiasco, what’s not been widely reported is that selling records has now become an overnight administrative and financial nightmare.
Reports of excessive ‘handling charges’ for senders (£8) and customs tax charges for the receivers of such goods (£16 for a 12” single/album) are now coming to light, and has adversely impacted and perhaps damaged the reputation of UK sellers forever. This is on top of ever-increasing postage charges.
A 12” vinyl record sells on average for around £14 to £20. To post this item to mainland Europe will cost around £10. Add to this an £8 ‘handling charge’ and a £16 import tax, customers are going to be looking at paying anywhere in the region of £45 to £55 for a 12” vinyl record to make it viable.
The fact is vinyl is expensive anyway, but no-one’s gonna pay in excess of £40 for a record especially when they can stream it for fuck-all on Spotify (don’t even get me started on Spotify).
article said:The Beatles were like a thousand other wannabe bands until they got on that boat to mainland Europe.
They only became as good as they did through playing every night in Hamburg.
Perhaps you could go read the views currently all over the place about this from people it will impact explaining why this new charge is a bad thing.I'm surprised there's not more support here for an organization that pays songwriters. I'm also pretty sure there are ways around paying this (how do they know how big an audience is? I imagine it's self-reported). It seems the PRS is trying to help music writers and producers to keep some income after license collections from brick-and-mortar premises have reduced considerably due to the pandemic and places being closed.
Maybe for fund raisers and charity dos they give discounted rates or rebates? Got to be worth calling them to ask, no?
I mean. We want musicians to keep getting paid after all. The PRS are doing that.
Streams are already being cancelled because of this.I think most people won't bother applying for a license, and they also won't bother doing the live stream at all.
Perhaps you could go read the views currently all over the place about this from people it will impact explaining why this new charge is a bad thing.
It's like watching a child smear his own shit on his bedroom walls. Have you considered just stopping?
what does this mean?Maybe see you on the shop floor sometime eh?
The PRS serve big name artists very well indeed.I get why people think this charge is a bad thing. People hate change, and they hate charges.
It seems the PRS are trying to make something out of a shitty situation that will ensure songwriters don't lose out too much.
I can understand the conflict here, but it seems there's a lot of entrenchment making that worse.